Legislator Rechtsprechung & Gesetzgebung
320.100 EGZZPOLACPC CH-GR

Art. 7 Einführungsgesetz zur Schweizerischen Zivilprozessordnung (EGzZPO) - Rechtsmittelinstanz

Zuständigkeit der Schlichtungsbehörden und Zivilgerichte
Originalquelle öffnen Gesamter Erlass (22 Artikel) Maschinenlesbares Markdown (.md)

Art. 7 EGzZPO · Rechtsmittelinstanz

1. Das Obergericht beurteilt als Rechtsmittelinstanz Berufungen und Beschwerden.

2. Es entscheidet in einzelrichterlicher Kompetenz

a) * über Beschwerden;

abis) * über Berufungen gegen Entscheide im summarischen Verfahren;

b) * wenn ein Rechtsmittel offensichtlich unzulässig oder offensichtlich begründet oder unbegründet ist.

3. Über Streitigkeiten gemäss Absatz 2 Litera a und Litera abis entscheidet das Obergericht in Dreierbesetzung, wenn dies von einer Partei in der ersten Rechtsschrift beantragt wird, der Streitwert 10 000 Franken übersteigt und das Rechtsmittel nicht offensichtlich unzulässig oder offensichtlich begründet oder unbegründet ist.

4. In den anderen Fällen entscheidet das Obergericht in der im Gerichtsorganisationsgesetz[13] vorgesehenen Besetzung.

← Art. 6 EGzZPO Einführungsgesetz zur Schweizerischen Zivilprozessordnung (EGzZPO) - Gegenstand Art. 8 EGzZPO →

Fragen Sie sich, wie diese Gesetzesbestimmung auf Ihren Fall anwendbar ist?

Prüfen Sie diesen Erlass zusammen mit Rechtsprechung, Kommentaren und verwandten Gesetzesbestimmungen in Legislator AI.

Fall in Legislator öffnen →

Gerichtsentscheide zu dieser Bestimmung (227)

ZR2 2025 10 · gr (Art. 7 Abs. 2 lit. b EGzZPO)
Application for Remission of Court Costs Denied Due to Insufficient Proof of Permanent Indigence and Prior Denial of Legal Aid
This article is cited to confirm the competence of the single judge for this type of application.
ZR2 2025 8 · gr (Art. 7 Abs. 2 lit. b EGzZPO)
Request for Litigation Cost Waiver Denied Due to Insufficient Proof of Permanent Indigence and Prior Legal Aid Rejection
This procedural rule was cited alongside Art. 38 Abs. 3 GOG to justify the decision being made by a single judge.
ZR1 2025 24 · gr (Art. 7 Abs. 4 EGzZPO)
Appellate Court Garnishment Jurisdiction Over Provisional Child Support Arrears
Cited in the reasoning to establish the court's competence to rule on the collection order while the main proceeding is pending.
ZR1 2025 24 · gr (Art. 7 Abs. 4 EGzZPO)
Appellate Court Jurisdiction Over Garnishee Order for Provisional Child Support Enforcement
Cited to establish the court's competence (in conjunction with Art. 9 GOG) to decide on the garnishee order while the main case is pending.
ZR1 2025 30 · gr (Art. 7 Abs. 2 lit. c EGzZPO)
Cost Waiver Denial for Outstanding Court Fees Due to Insufficient Substantiation of Financial Hardship
This procedural rule determined the single-judge competence to rule on the application because it was deemed obviously unfounded.
ZR2 2025 1 · gr (Art. 38 Abs. 3 GOG [BR 173.000] und Art. 7 Abs. 2 lit. abis und lit. b i. V. m. Art. 7 Abs. 3 e contrario EGzZPO [BR 320.100])
Landlord Eviction Upheld for Breach of Settlement Condition
Cited in the reasoning justifying the decision being made by a single judge.
KSK 2024 85 · gr (art. 7 cpv. 2 lett. b LACPC [CSC 320.100])
Enforcement Creditor v. Debtor (Heating Cost Adjustment Enforceability)
Cited as the legal basis for the President ruling as a single judge due to the obvious unfoundedness of the appeal.
ZK2 2024 24 · gr (art. 7 cpv. 1 LACPC)
Claimant v. Conciliation Authority (Undue Delay)
Cited to establish the competence of the Second Civil Chamber of the Cantonal Court to rule on the appeal for undue delay.
ZK2 2024 24 · gr (art. 7 cpv. 2 lett. b LACPC)
Claimant v. Conciliation Authority (Undue Delay)
Cited as the legal basis for deciding the manifestly founded appeal by a single judge.
ZK2 2024 25 · gr (art. 7 cpv. 2 lett. b LACPC)
Complaint Regarding Delayed Conciliation Hearing
Cited to justify the decision being made by a single judge.
KSK 2024 63 · gr (Art. 7 Abs. 2 lit. b EGzZPO)
Appeal Against Bankruptcy Proceedings Over Sole Proprietorship Due to Unpaid Insurance Premiums
Cited in connection with Art. 18 Abs. 3 GOG as the basis for rendering the decision in single-judge competence because the appeal was evidently well-founded.
KSK 2024 17 · gr (Art. 7 Abs. 1 EGzZPO)
Social Security Contribution Office v. Debtor (Definitive Legal Authorization for Enforcement)
Cited in the reasoning for establishing the jurisdiction of the Cantonal Court.
KSK 2024 17 · gr (Art. 7 Abs. 2 lit. a EGzZPO)
Social Security Contribution Office v. Debtor (Definitive Legal Authorization for Enforcement)
Cited in the reasoning for establishing the jurisdiction of the Single Judge due to the value in dispute.
ZK1 2023 75 · gr (Art. 7 Abs. 1 EGzZPO)
Child Support Arrears Offset Period Limitation
Cited in the reasoning section regarding the deadline and formal requirements for lodging an appeal.
ZK2 2024 15 · gr (Art. 7 Abs. 2 lit. b EGzZPO)
Cantonal Court Dismisses Appeal Against Eviction Due to Untimely Filing and Procedural Defects
Cited as the basis for the decision being rendered by a single judge because the appeal was obviously unfounded.