Legislator Rechtsprechung & Gesetzgebung
173.000 GOGLOG CH-GR

Art. 40 Gerichtsorganisationsgesetz (GOG) - Gerichtsverwaltung 1. Gesamtgericht

Gerichtsbehörden - Obergericht - Allgemeine Organisation
Originalquelle öffnen Gesamter Erlass (122 Artikel) Maschinenlesbares Markdown (.md)

Art. 40 GOG · Gerichtsverwaltung 1. Gesamtgericht

1. Dem Gesamtgericht gehören die ordentlichen Mitglieder an.

2. Ihm obliegen

a) der Erlass von Gerichtsverordnungen;

b) die Verabschiedung des Budgets, der Jahresrechnung und des Geschäftsberichts des Obergerichts sowie der unter seiner Aufsicht stehenden richterlichen Behörden zuhanden des Grossen Rates;

c) die Verabschiedung von Anträgen zuhanden des Grossen Rates, mit denen die Regierung beauftragt werden soll, die Justizverwaltung betreffende Gesetzes- oder Verfassungsvorlagen auszuarbeiten;

d) die Bestellung der Abteilungen und allfälliger Kammern;

e) die Ernennung der Abteilungs- und allfälliger Kammervorsitzenden und der Stellvertretungen;

f) die Wahl der weiteren Mitglieder der Verwaltungskommission und der anderen vom Obergericht zu wählenden Personen;

g) die Koordination der Rechtsprechung unter den Abteilungen;

h) die Beantragung der Amtsenthebung von Mitgliedern des Obergerichts;

i) die Anstellung und Entlassung der festangestellten Mitarbeitenden;

j) die Verabschiedung von Vernehmlassungen;

k) weitere Aufgaben, die ihm durch Gesetz oder Verordnung übertragen werden.

3. Beschlüsse des Gesamtgerichts sind gültig, wenn an der Sitzung oder am Zirkularverfahren mindestens zwei Drittel der Mitglieder des Gesamtgerichts mitwirken.

← Art. 39 GOG Gerichtsorganisationsgesetz (GOG) - Gegenstand Art. 41 GOG →

Fragen Sie sich, wie diese Gesetzesbestimmung auf Ihren Fall anwendbar ist?

Prüfen Sie diesen Erlass zusammen mit Rechtsprechung, Kommentaren und verwandten Gesetzesbestimmungen in Legislator AI.

Fall in Legislator öffnen →

Gerichtsentscheide zu dieser Bestimmung (22)

SK2 2023 27 · gr (Art. 40 Abs. 2 GOG)
Case Transfer Due to Apparent Judicial Conflict of Interest
This article is referenced in the reasoning section concerning the court's power to assign jurisdiction to another court when replacement is necessary, although it is not explicitly cited in the final dispositive orders 1-5.
JAK 2023 11 · gr (Art. 40 Abs. 2 GOG)
Canton v. Debtor: Designation of Impartial Court for Enforcement Opposition
The request for the appointment of an independent court was decided based on this provision.
SK2 2020 53 · gr (Art. 40 Abs. 2 GOG)
Appointment of Substitute Jurisdiction for Criminal Investigation of Regional Court President
Cited in the reasoning for the request for assignment of an independent court, which was granted in order 1.
SK2 2017 48 · gr (art. 40 cpv. 2 LOG)
Regional Court Recusal Due to Clerk's Relationships
This provision was used to declare another regional court competent after the successful recusal.
SK2 2015 36 · gr (art. 40 cpv. 2 LOG)
Case Transfer Due to Appearance of Partiality in Small District Court
This provision was used to determine the procedure for appointing a substitute court after the original court was refused.
JAK 2014 14 · gr (Art. 40 Abs. 2 GOG)
Estate Representative Appointment Substitution Due to Conflict of Interest
Basis for appointing the single judge of another District Court due to the official function of B._____ as Head of Chancery at the District Court X._____.
JAK 2014 14 · gr (Art. 40 Abs. 2 GOG)
Estate Representative Appointment Substitution Due to Conflict of Interest
Cited in the reasoning, and relevant to the application of Art. 40 Abs. 2 GOG in order 1, thus included.
JAK 2014 14 · gr (Art. 40 Abs. 2 GOG)
Estate Administration Recusal and Substitution of Court
Cited as the basis for the Chamber to appoint the judge of another district court due to the established grounds for recusal concerning the court clerk.
JAK 2014 12 · gr (Art. 40 Abs. 2 GOG)
Transfer of Jurisdiction Due to Conflict of Interest in Enforcement Proceedings
This provision was the basis for declaring the competence of the judge of the neighboring district (Maloja) due to the impossibility of seating judges from the original district.
JAK 2014 12 · gr (Art. 40 Abs. 2 GOG)
Jurisdictional Assignment Due to Conflict of Interest in Payment Order Objection
The application was granted, designating the judge of the Maloja District Court as competent for the main matter.
JAK 2014 6 · gr (Art. 13 Abs. 2 EGzZPO in Verbindung mit Art. 40 Abs. 2 GOG)
Debt Enforcement Matter Bias Claim Against Court Denied
Cited in the reasoning to justify the court's competence to rule on the request for substitution without further examination of the grounds for recusal, although not explicitly in the dispositive orders 1-4.
JAK 2014 6 · gr (Art. 40 Abs. 2 GOG)
Debt Enforcement Matter Bias Claim Against Court Denied
Cited in the reasoning to support the court's ability to rule on substitution, although not explicitly in the dispositive orders 1-4.
JAK 2013 22 · gr (Art. 40 Abs. 2 GOG)
Appearance of Bias Justifies Substitute Court Assignment in Civil Claim Against Foundation
The Chamber declares the District Court of Imboden competent to hear the claim, following its established practice based on this provision for cases where the entire court body is disqualified.
JAK 2013 22 · gr (Art. 40 Abs. 2 GOG)
Foundation Conflict of Interest Recusal of Entire District Court
Used to appoint another court when the ordinary court is unable to hear the case due to apparent bias.
JAK 2012 31 · gr (Art. 40 Abs. 2 GOG)
Criminal Proceeding Recusal Jurisdiction Transfer
This provision is relevant to the subsequent designation of substitute judges or the declaration of jurisdiction of a neighboring court, which the Court finds should be handled by the II. Criminal Chamber (SK2) rather than the Judicial Supervisory Chamber (JAK).