780.1
MOBGLMOB
CH-FR
Art. 9 Loi sur la mobilité (LMob) - Commission consultative mobilité
Dispositions générales - Compétences
Art. 9 LMob · Commission consultative mobilité
1. Une commission consultative pour la mobilité est instituée par le Conseil d'Etat pour examiner les problèmes généraux relatifs à ce domaine, faire des propositions et donner son avis sur des problèmes particuliers de mobilité.
2. La composition de la Commission est représentative des régions et des parties linguistiques ainsi que des acteurs concernés.
3. Elle comprend au maximum vingt membres, qui sont nommés par le Conseil d'Etat et parmi lesquels cinq sont désignés par le Grand Conseil et cinq par l'association représentant les communes.
4. Elle peut créer des groupes de travail pour des politiques sectorielles ou des projets concrets. Des experts et expertes peuvent y être associés.
Décisions judiciaires appliquant cette disposition (17)
60/2005/2 · sh (Art. 9 Abs. 1 BÜPF)
Admissibility of Incidental Findings in Administrative Proceedings Following Criminal Investigations
This provision regarding incidental findings in wiretaps was examined for analog application, but ultimately rejected by the majority.
P/3983/2008 · ge (art. 9 al. 1 let. a LSCPT)
Appellant v. State: Lawfulness of Real-Time Surveillance for Unrelated Offenses
Cited to justify the use of information discovered incidentally regarding drug trafficking, as the suspect was the same person authorized for surveillance.
P/3983/2008 · ge (art. 9 al. 2 LSCPT)
Appellant v. State: Lawfulness of Real-Time Surveillance for Unrelated Offenses
Cited in the reasoning section regarding the conditions under which information concerning a different punishable act against the same suspect can be used.
P/3983/2008 · ge (art. 9 al. 3 LSCPT)
Appellant v. State: Lawfulness of Real-Time Surveillance for Unrelated Offenses
Cited in the reasoning section concerning the requirement for a posterior authorization if incidental findings concern a different suspect.
AC040127 · zh (Art. 9 Abs. 2 BÜPF)
Appeal Granted Due to Refusal of On-Site Inspection
Cited in connection with the need for approval for random findings during surveillance, but the court deemed the issue to be governed by federal law regarding appellate review.
RBOG.2005.Nr.33 · tg (Art. 9 Abs. 2 und 3 BÜPF)
Employment Violation Case: Admissibility of Intermediate Finding Evidence
This provision was cited by the appellant as the basis for excluding evidence obtained from telephone surveillance, although the court ultimately found the secondary evidence (X's statement) admissible.
AC050018 · zh (Art. 9 des BG betreffend die Überwachung des Post- und Fernmeldverkehrs (BÜPF))
Appeal dismissed: bodily harm and extortion convictions upheld.
Cited as the governing law for the use of incidental findings from telephone monitoring.
TPF 2005 169 (Art. 9 Abs. 2 BÜPF)
Urgent Surveillance Requests: Incidental Findings and New Measures
This provision governs the use of intercepted information by third parties and requires prior authorization from the supervisory authority for further investigations based on such findings.
TPF 2006 217 (Art. 9 Abs. 2 BÜPF)
Legality of Foreign Surveillance Incidental Findings
Used to establish the condition that the legality of a foreign surveillance measure must be proven for the use of incidental findings.
TPF 2006 271 (Art. 9 Abs. 1 lit. a und b BÜPF)
Jurisdiction over Pretrial Detention Release Request
Defines the types of offenses for which individuals listed as suspects in a surveillance order are excluded from the general approval for using incidental findings.
TPF 2006 271 (Art. 9 Abs. 2 BÜPF)
Jurisdiction over Pretrial Detention Release Request
Governs the requirement to seek consent for the use of incidental findings for individuals not listed as suspects in a surveillance order.
TPF 2006 274 (Art. 9 Abs. 1 BÜPF)
Surveillance Findings: Use Against Listed vs. Unlisted Suspects
Used to allow the use of surveillance findings against suspect A. without prior approval from the authorizing authority.
TPF 2006 274 (Art. 9 Abs. 2 BÜPF)
Surveillance Findings: Use Against Listed vs. Unlisted Suspects
Used to grant approval for the use of surveillance findings against suspects C., D., E., and F. in their criminal proceedings.
SB150475 · zh (Art. 9 Abs. 1 lit. a BÜPF)
Zurich Acquittal on Kidnapping/Secrecy Incitement, Conviction on Unemployment Insurance Violations
Cited in the reasoning to address the admissibility of evidence discovered during surveillance initially authorized for a different crime.
SB150475 · zh (Art. 9 Abs. 3 BÜPF)
Zurich Acquittal on Kidnapping/Secrecy Incitement, Conviction on Unemployment Insurance Violations
Cited in the reasoning concerning the consequence of the collapse of the predicate offense (Katalogtat) on the admissibility of evidence regarding other crimes.