710.1 RPBGLATEC

CH-FR

Art. 88 Loi sur l'aménagement du territoire et les constructions (LATeC) - Recours

Aménagement du territoire - Aménagement local - Procédure applicable aux plans et aux règlements communaux - Plans d'affectation des zones, plans d'aménagement de détail et leur réglementation

Ouvrir la source officielle Texte complet (208 Articles) Version Markdown lisible par machine (.md)

Art. 88 LATeC · Recours

1. Les décisions communales sur les oppositions peuvent faire l'objet d'un recours à la Direction.

2. Simultanément à sa décision d'approbation ou de non-approbation des plans et des règlements, la Direction statue sur les recours interjetés contre les décisions communales sur les oppositions, en réservant au ou à la juge de l'expropriation les prétentions éventuelles à indemnisation des propriétaires dont les immeubles sont touchés par les plans ou leur réglementation.

3. Les décisions de la Direction sont sujettes à recours au Tribunal cantonal.

← Art. 87 LATeC Loi sur l'aménagement du territoire et les constructions (LATeC) - Buts Art. 89 LATeC →

Décisions judiciaires appliquant cette disposition (37)

602 2022 19 · fr (Art. 88 al. 3 LATeC)

Marshland Chalet Dismantlement Upheld Against Vested Rights Claim

Cited in conjunction with Art. 22 al. 2 LATeC to establish the admissibility of the appeal regarding cantonal spatial planning.

602 2022 20 · fr (art. 88 al. 3 LATeC)

Chalet Dismantling on Marshland Reserve Land

Cited in the reasoning section in connection with Art. 22 al. 2 LATeC to establish the admissibility of the appeal concerning the cantonal development plan.

602 2023 170 · fr (art. 88 al. 3 de la loi fribourgeoise du 2 décembre 2008 sur l'aménagement du territoire et les constructions (LATeC))

Municipal Development Plan Revision Appeals: Zoning Disputes and Unbuilt Reserve Limits

Used to establish the admissibility of the appeals concerning the property owners based on a specific rule.

602 2023 47 · fr (art. 88 al. 3 de la loi cantonale du 2 décembre 2008 sur l'aménagement du territoire et les constructions (LATeC; RSF 710.1))

Cantonal Court Rejects Full Inconstructibility in Protected Zone Revision

Cited as one of the grounds for the admissibility of the appeal.

602 2023 15 · fr (art. 88 al. 3 LATeC)

Landowner Appeal Regarding Agricultural to Business Rezoning Denial

Cited to confirm the admissibility of the appeal regarding procedure.

602 2023 20 · fr (Art. 88 al. 3 LATeC)

Property Owner v. Canton Regarding Rezoning Denial Based on Concurrent Building Permit Requirement

Cited in the reasoning (section 1) as part of the legal basis for admitting the appeal, but not explicitly in the final orders I-IV.

602 2023 121 · fr (art. 88 al. 3 de la loi fribourgeoise du 2 décembre 2008 sur l'aménagement du territoire et les constructions (LATeC; RSF 710.1))

Appeal Against Expropriation for Pedestrian and Bicycle Path

Cited to establish the admissibility of the appeal concerning the Territorial Planning and Construction Act.

602 2022 40 · fr (art. 88 al. 3 de la loi fribourgeoise du 2 décembre 2008 sur l'aménagement du territoire et les constructions (LATeC; RSF 710.1))

Property Owner v. Municipality (Rezoning for Urban Park)

Cited as a specific procedural basis for the admissibility of the appeal.

602 2022 148 · fr (Art. 88 Abs. 3 RPBG)

Challenger Lacked Standing to Appeal Zoning Revision After Failing to Exhaust Remedies

Cited as the basis for the Cantonal Court's jurisdiction to hear the appeal.

602 2022 148 · fr (Art. 88 RPBG)

Challenger Lacked Standing to Appeal Zoning Revision After Failing to Exhaust Remedies

Cited to explain the next procedural step, which is the appeal to the RIMU against the municipal decision on objections.

602 2021 15 · fr (art. 88 al. 3 LATeC)

Property Owner v. Rezoning Decision Appeal

Cited as one of the legal bases for the receivability of the appeal.

602 2021 75 · fr (art. 88 al. 3 LATeC)

Property Owner v. Municipality over Medieval Castle Buffer Zone

Cited in the reasoning as the basis for accepting the appeal as admissible (special norm).

602 2021 29 · fr (Art. 88 al. 3 LATeC)

Property Co-owners v. Local Development Plan Modification Approval

Cited as a basis for the admissibility of the appeal before the Cantonal Court.

602 2021 145 · fr (art. 88 al. 3 LATeC)

Administrative Planning Appeal Regarding Development Plan Re-publication and Agricultural Right-of-Way

Cited alongside procedural law to establish the admissibility of the appeal.

602 2021 36 · fr (Art. 88 al. 3 LATeC)

TransAgglo Route Approval Upheld Against Water Source Concerns

Cited in conjunction with Art. 37 al. 1 let. b LR to establish the Cantonal Tribunal's jurisdiction to rule on the appeals.