Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
710.1 RPBGLATEC CH-FR

Art. 167 Loi sur l'aménagement du territoire et les constructions (LATeC) - Travaux non conformes

Constructions - Police des constructions
Ouvrir la source officielle Texte complet (208 Articles) Version Markdown lisible par machine (.md)

Art. 167 LATeC · Travaux non conformes

1. Lorsque le ou la propriétaire exécute des travaux sans permis ou en violation des plans, des conditions du permis ou d'une mesure de protection, le préfet ordonne, d'office ou sur requête, l'arrêt total ou partiel des travaux.

2. Dans les cas visés à l'alinéa 1 et lorsque des constructions ou installations illégales sont déjà réalisées, le préfet impartit un délai convenable au ou à la propriétaire pour déposer une demande de permis de construire en vue de la légalisation des travaux effectués, à moins qu'une telle légalisation n'apparaisse d'emblée exclue.

3. Si le ou la propriétaire n'obtempère pas à l'ordre reçu ou si les travaux ne peuvent être légalisés, le préfet peut, après avoir entendu les personnes et les organes intéressés, ordonner, sans préjudice des sanctions pénales, les modifications ou les adaptations, la démolition totale ou partielle des ouvrages, la remise en état du sol. Lorsque les circonstances le commandent, le préfet peut prononcer une interdiction d'occuper les locaux ou de les exploiter.

4. Lorsque des travaux sis hors de la zone à bâtir ont été exécutés sans permis ou en violation du droit applicable en la matière, la Direction est compétente pour prendre les mesures prévues à l'alinéa 3.

← Art. 166 LATeC Loi sur l'aménagement du territoire et les constructions (LATeC) - Buts Art. 168 LATeC →

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cette disposition s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez ce texte législatif avec la jurisprudence, la doctrine et les dispositions connexes dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Décisions judiciaires appliquant cette disposition (74)

602 2025 38 · fr (art. 167 al. 2 LATeC)
Permit Violation and Loss of Acquired Situation Status
This provision was cited as the legal basis for the lower authority's decision to require the property owners to submit a building permit application to legalize non-conforming works.
602 2025 59 · fr (Art. 167 Abs. 2 RPBG)
Owner Appeal Dismissed Regarding Gravel Lot Permit and Vehicle Storage Prohibition
The court confirmed the renewed deadline for submitting a building application, explicitly referring to the principle codified in this paragraph.
602 2025 59 · fr (Art. 167 RPBG)
Owner Appeal Dismissed Regarding Gravel Lot Permit and Vehicle Storage Prohibition
The court cited this article as the basis for the authority to prohibit the use of the property until a permit is obtained, confirming the legality of the prohibition ordered by the lower authority.
602 2025 59 · fr (Art. 167 RPBG)
Owner Appeal Dismissed Regarding Gravel Lot Permit and Vehicle Storage Prohibition
The court confirmed the challenged interlocutory order, which was based on the power granted in this article to demand filing a building application for illegal works/uses.
602 2023 102 · fr (art. 167 al. 2 LATeC)
Community Center Sub-leasing Noise Disturbance Permit Dispute
Cited in the context of the neighbours' standing to appeal regarding the need for a legalization procedure.
602 2024 199 · fr (art. 167 al. 4 LATeC)
Property Owner Appeal Against Alpine Chalet Renovation Restoration Order Dismissed
Cited regarding the competence of the Directorate for measures concerning constructions executed outside the building zone.
602 2024 169 · fr (art. 167 al. 4 LATeC)
Owner Appeal Against Transfer of Jurisdiction for Unpermitted Works
Cited to define the competence of the DIME regarding measures to restore the legal state for works outside the building zone.
602 2024 32 · fr (art. 167 al. 1 LATeC)
Fitness Center Operating Hours Restriction Appeal
The court confirmed the Prefect's decision, which was based on this provision concerning non-compliant works, as the main ground for upholding the restrictions.
602 2023 70 · fr (art. 167 al. 2 LATeC)
Prefectural Demolition Order Overturned Due to Failure to Consider Legalization Derogation
The court ordered the file to be returned to the Prefect to set a deadline for the applicants to file a formal building permit application for legalization, as mandated by this article.
602 2023 70 · fr (art. 167 al. 3 LATeC)
Prefectural Demolition Order Overturned Due to Failure to Consider Legalization Derogation
The court stipulated that if the deadline set under Art. 167 al. 2 LATeC is not met, or if the permit is refused, the prefecture shall rule again based on this article.
602 2023 108 · fr (art. 167 al. 1 LATeC)
Owner Fails to Validate Plaster Samples, Renovation Stoppage Upheld
Cited in the reasoning leading to the confirmation that the order to stop the works was justified under this provision.
602 2023 69 · fr (Art. 167 al. 2 LATeC)
Territorial Development Authority vs. Property Owner Regarding Illegal Construction in Nature Protection Area
This provision relates to the requirement to apply for a building permit for legalization, which was central to the court's finding that the constructions were not legalizable.
602 2022 254 · fr (Art. 167 Abs. 2 RPBG)
Zoning Permit Appeal for Horse Farm Dismissed
Cited in the reasoning section regarding the procedure for legalizing unlawfully constructed buildings (basis for the decision on the main issue).
602 2022 254 · fr (Art. 167 Abs. 4 RPBG)
Zoning Permit Appeal for Horse Farm Dismissed
Cited in the reasoning section regarding the authority responsible for re-establishing the lawful state for work outside the building zone.
602 2022 254 · fr (Art. 167 RPBG)
Zoning Permit Appeal for Horse Farm Dismissed
Cited in the final orders regarding potential future initiation of proceedings if non-conforming activities resume.