Art. 30 Loi sur les subventions (LSub) - Conditions particulières - Investissements

B-6837/2024 (Art. 30 Abs. 3 SuG)

Innovation Grant Revoked Due to SME Status Change Post-Takeover

This provision is cited as the legal basis for reclaiming already disbursed contributions upon revocation of a subsidy.

B-995/2023 (Art. 30 SuG)

Livestock Conservation Grant Dispute: Contractual vs. Administrative Procedure

Cited in the context of revocation of financial aid decisions.

A-3781/2021 (Art. 30 Abs. 1 SuG)

Road Safety Project Funding Dispute Over Substantiated Costs

Cited as the legal basis for revoking a subsidy decision if it was wrongly granted due to a violation of legal provisions or an incorrect/incomplete factual basis.

A-2894/2022 (Art. 30 Abs. 1 SuG)

BAKOM v. Radio Broadcaster: Pension Fund Remediation Provision Not Eligible for COVID-19 Subsidy Repayment Calculation

The provision that the competent authority must revoke a financial aid decision if it was granted unjustly due to a violation of legal provisions or an incorrect or incomplete determination of the facts.

A-2894/2022 (Art. 30 Abs. 3 Satz 1 SuG)

BAKOM v. Radio Broadcaster: Pension Fund Remediation Provision Not Eligible for COVID-19 Subsidy Repayment Calculation

The provision that the authority, when revoking a financial aid decision, shall reclaim the amounts already paid.

A-2895/2022 (Art. 30 Abs. 1 SuG)

Radio Broadcaster's COVID-19 Subsidy Recalled Due to Overstated Profit

Used to partially revoke the initial decision and reclaim unduly paid financial aid.

A-2895/2022 (Art. 30 Abs. 3 Satz 1 SuG)

Radio Broadcaster's COVID-19 Subsidy Recalled Due to Overstated Profit

Basis for reclaiming the excess financial aid that was paid out.

A-2897/2022 (Art. 30 Abs. 1 SuG)

Broadcaster's COVID-19 Aid Recovery Upheld Over Pension Fund Provision

Cited as the legal basis for the authority to withdraw a subsidy decision.

A-2897/2022 (Art. 30 Abs. 3 Satz 1 SuG)

Broadcaster's COVID-19 Aid Recovery Upheld Over Pension Fund Provision

Cited for the authority to reclaim unduly paid subsidies.

A-1431/2022 (Art. 30 al. 1 LSu)

Media Company Repays Pandemic Funds Due to Improper Asset Amortization

Cited as the legal basis for revoking a decision granting aid when the benefit was unduly allocated due to an inaccurate or incomplete factual situation.

A-1431/2022 (Art. 30 al. 2 LSu)

Media Company Repays Pandemic Funds Due to Improper Asset Amortization

Cited to assess the conditions under which the competent authority may waive the revocation of a decision granting aid.

A-4488/2021 (Art. 30 Abs. 1 SuG)

Transport Company v. Federal Office of Transport: Subsidy Reimbursement and Trust Protection on Interest Calculation

The court used this article to determine the conditions under which a subsidy decision can be revoked, which was the basis for the dispute.

A-4488/2021 (Art. 30 Abs. 2 SuG)

Transport Company v. Federal Office of Transport: Subsidy Reimbursement and Trust Protection on Interest Calculation

This article was considered to determine if there were grounds for waiving the revocation of subsidies.

A-4488/2021 (Art. 30 Abs. 3 SuG)

Transport Company v. Federal Office of Transport: Subsidy Reimbursement and Trust Protection on Interest Calculation

This article was used to justify the charging of interest on reclaimed subsidies due to culpable conduct.

A-1484/2022 (Art. 30 al. 1 LSu)

Broadcaster Ordered to Repay COVID Subsidy Due to Insufficient Financial Transparency

Ground for revoking the decision to grant aid when the benefit was unduly awarded.