Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
420.1 BBIGLFP CH-FR

Art. 13 Loi sur la formation professionnelle (LFP) - Offre de cours

Dispositions générales - Centres de formation professionnelle
Ouvrir la source officielle Texte complet (85 Articles) Version Markdown lisible par machine (.md)

Art. 13 LFP · Offre de cours

1. Le Service est compétent en matière d'offre de cours.

2. Les centres de formation professionnelle assurent l'enseignement obligatoire défini par les ordonnances sur la formation professionnelle initiale (ci-après: ordonnances sur la formation), sous réserve des accords intercantonaux et d'autres conventions de prestations.

3. Les centres de formation professionnelle peuvent également offrir des compléments de formation, notamment dans le cadre de la procédure de prise en compte des acquis et de la formation professionnelle supérieure.

4. Si l'organisation de cours ou l'ouverture de classes supplémentaires n'est pas opportune, notamment pour des raisons d'effectif ou de logistique, le Service peut octroyer aux centres de formation professionnelle des dérogations quant à l'obligation d'organiser certains cours ou à l'opportunité d'ouvrir des classes supplémentaires et peut, par mandats, confier à des tiers la tâche de dispenser l'enseignement obligatoire et les autres cours.

5. Le Conseil d'Etat édicte des dispositions en matière d'offre de cours.

← Art. 12 LFP Loi sur la formation professionnelle (LFP) - Objet Art. 14 LFP →

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cette disposition s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez ce texte législatif avec la jurisprudence, la doctrine et les dispositions connexes dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Décisions judiciaires appliquant cette disposition (24)

EDÖB · SNF Dokumente zum (Art. 13 Abs. 4 FIFG)
Freedom of Information Act Request for Research Grant Information
Cited as a special provision of federal law that potentially precludes access to expert names.
EDÖB · empfehlung vom 5deze (Art. 13 Abs. 3 FIFG)
Swiss National Fund Transparency Case
Cited as a special provision that allows for the withholding of expert names in peer review procedures.
B-177/2024 (art. 13 LERI)
Research Foundation Denied Non-Profit Status for Inadequate Research Basis
Used to assess the grounds for appeal, including violations of federal law and abuse of discretionary power.
B-4950/2023 (Art. 13 Abs. 3 Bst. b FIFG)
Scientific Discretion and Funding Application Rejection Upheld
The court used this provision to assess the factual findings made by the lower instance regarding the applicant's qualifications and project feasibility.
B-4950/2023 (Art. 13 FIFG)
Scientific Discretion and Funding Application Rejection Upheld
This provision was used in conjunction with VGG provisions to establish the court's jurisdiction for appeals concerning research grants.
B-4982/2024 (Art. 13 Abs. 3 FIFG)
Innovation Funding Appeal Dismissed for Lack of Merit
This provision specifies that appeals in innovation funding matters are limited to violations of federal law and factual inaccuracies, excluding appeals based on inappropriateness.
EDÖB 2024-12-16 (Art. 13 Abs. 4 FIFG)
FDPIC Report: Data Protection in the Pandemic Era
This provision governs the conditions under which the names of referees and scientific experts involved in research funding decisions can be disclosed, particularly in the context of appeals.
B-223/2022 (art. 13 LERI)
Grant Rejection Upheld Due to Lack of Broad Public Impact
Cited as the legal basis for the applicant's right to appeal and the grounds for review by the Federal Administrative Court.
B-1320/2022 (Art. 13 Abs. 3 und Abs. 5 des Bundesgesetzes über die Förderung der Forschung und der Innovation vom 14. Dezember 2012 (FIFG, SR 420.1) i.V.m Art. 31 und Art. 33 Bst. h VGG)
Postdoctoral Research Grant Rejection Upheld for Swiss-Based Research Proposal
Cited as the basis for the jurisdiction of the Federal Administrative Court regarding decisions on granting contributions.
B-4694/2020 (Art. 13 LERI)
Researcher's Spark Grant Application Rejected Due to Lack of Scientific Rigor
Used to reject the appeal because the decision did not violate federal law, nor did it involve an excessive or abusive exercise of discretion, nor did it result from an inaccurate or incomplete determination of relevant facts.
B-5027/2019 (Art. 13 LERI)
Grant Rejection Upheld Due to Insufficient International Cultural Diplomacy Integration
Cited as the basis for the applicant's right to appeal and the procedural rules for subsidy decisions.
B-6578/2019 (Art. 13 LERI)
Research Equipment Subsidy Rejection Upheld Due to Lack of Innovation and Personnel Issues
Cited as the legal basis for challenging the decision based on federal law violations, including abuse of discretion and inaccurate fact-finding.
B-6578/2019 (Art. 13 LERI)
Research Equipment Subsidy Rejection Upheld Due to Lack of Innovation and Personnel Issues
Cited as the legal basis for the right to appeal and for the applicants' standing to appeal.
B-3448/2019 (Art. 13 LERI)
Applicant Fails to Prove Reduced Research Activity for Grant Eligibility
Used to define the grounds for appeal concerning violations of federal law and factual findings.
A-6160/2018 (Art. 13 Abs. 4 FIFG)
Public Interest Group v. National Research Program (Confidentiality of Grant and Reviewer Information)
The court used this provision to address the confidentiality of peer reviewers' names, requiring the National Science Foundation to seek their consent for disclosure.