340.1 SMVGLEPM

CH-FR

Art. 74 Loi sur l'exécution des peines et des mesures (LEPM) - Généralités

Exécution des peines privatives de liberté et des mesures - Procédure et voies de droit

Ouvrir la source officielle Texte complet (84 Articles) Version Markdown lisible par machine (.md)

Art. 74 LEPM · Généralités

1. La procédure est régie par le code de procédure et de juridiction administrative.

2. Sous réserve des règles spéciales, les décisions du Service peuvent faire l'objet d'un recours devant la Direction, puis devant le Tribunal cantonal.

3. Le recours contre le refus de la libération conditionnelle d'une peine, d'une mesure thérapeutique institutionnelle ou de l'internement ou contre le refus de la levée d'une mesure thérapeutique est porté directement devant le Tribunal cantonal.

4. Le Ministère public a qualité pour recourir directement devant le Tribunal cantonal contre les décisions d'octroi de la libération conditionnelle, de levée de la mesure et de sorties pour des personnes exécutant une mesure thérapeutique institutionnelle au sens de l'article 59 al. 3 CP ou étant internées.

← Art. 73 LEPM Loi sur l'exécution des peines et des mesures (LEPM) - Objet Art. 75 LEPM →

Décisions judiciaires appliquant cette disposition (27)

601 2025 3 · fr (art. 74 al. 3 et 79 al. 1 de la loi cantonale du 7 octobre 2016 sur l'exécution des peines et des mesures (LEPM))

Appeal Dismissed: Conditional Release Denial Upheld Despite New Mental Health Claim

Cited in the preamble for the basis of admissibility of the administrative appeal (recours).

601 2025 49 · fr (art. 74 al. 2 de la loi cantonale du 7 octobre 2016 sur l'exécution des peines et des mesures (LEPM; RSF 340.1))

Appellant v. Executing Authority: Denial of Electronic Monitoring Upheld Due to Extensive Reoffending Risk

Cited in conjunction with procedural law to establish the receivability of the appeal.

601 2025 39 · fr (art. 74 al. 2 LEPM)

Appeal of Transfer from Closed to Open Penal Facility for Treatment

Cited in the reasoning as the basis for the admissibility of the appeal before the Cantonal Tribunal, in connection with procedural law.

601 2024 88 · fr (art. 74 al. 3 LEPM)

Legal Aid for Review of Institutional Therapeutic Measure

Though cited in the reasoning for jurisdiction, this article is implicitly used as the basis for finding that the appeal on the merits should be rejected by the Cantonal Court, which is the proper venue for the main issue (point II of the dispositive is about the appeal 601 2024 88 concerning the decision that should have been appealed to the Cantonal Court).

601 2024 92 · fr (art. 74 al. 3 de la loi cantonale du 7 octobre 2016 sur l'exécution des peines et des mesures, LEPM)

Appeal Against Refusal of Conditional Release Based on Reclassified Psychiatric Diagnosis

Cited in conjunction with CPJA to establish the admissibility of the appeal.

601 2024 38 · fr (art. 74 al. 3 LEPM)

Appeal Dismissed: Continuation of Therapeutic Measure Justified by Non-Compliance and Insufficient Insight

Used in conjunction with CPJA to declare the appeal admissible.

502 2024 183 · fr (art. 74 al. 2 LEPM)

Appeal Against Continued Detention for Security Risk

Cited to indicate which authority is competent for the transfer request, used to justify inadmissibility in order II.

601 2024 3 · fr (Art. 74 al. 2 LEPM)

Detainee Compensation Deduction and Legal Aid Denial Appeal Dismissed

Cited as a specific procedural ground for the admissibility and review of the appeal.

601 2023 141 · fr (art. 74 al. 3 LEPM)

Refusal of Conditional Release Upheld Despite Good Prison Conduct Due to History of Non-Compliance and Reoffending Risk

Cited as the basis for the admissibility of the appeal to the Cantonal Tribunal.

601 2023 113 · fr (Art. 74 Abs. 3 SMVG)

Appeal Against Refusal of Open Prison Transfer Dismissed; Delay Complaint Moot; Legal Aid Granted.

Cited as part of the basis for jurisdiction in the court's reasoning.

601 2023 65 · fr (Art. 74 al. 3 et 79 al. 1 LEPM)

Detainee Conditional Release Denial Upheld Due to Poor Custody Conduct

Cited in conjunction with Art. 114 al. 2 let. a CPJA as the basis for the admissibility of the appeal.

601 2021 192 · fr (art. 74 al. 2 LEPM)

Asylum Seeker Refused Community Service Sentence Due to Recidivism Risk

This specific cantonal law provision was cited to confirm the admissibility of the appeal before entering into the merits.

601 2021 183 · fr (Art. 74 al. 3 LEPM)

Appeal Regarding Refusal of Conditional Release and Continuation of Institutional Therapeutic Measure

Used in conjunction with Art. 114 al. 2 CPJA to establish the admissibility of the administrative appeal.

601 2021 130 · fr (art. 74 al. 3 LEPM)

Denial of Conditional Early Release Upheld Due to Poor Criminal Record and Uncertain Prognosis

Cited in conjunction with CPJA provisions for establishing the admissibility of the appeal.

601 2020 144 · fr (Art. 74 al. 3 et 79 al. 1 LEPM)

Violation of Right to be Heard in Conditional Release Decision

These provisions were cited in the reasoning section as the basis for the admissibility of the administrative appeal before the Cantonal Court, which is a necessary prerequisite for issuing the final orders.