Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
150.1 VRGCPJA CH-FR

Art. 96a Code de procédure et de juridiction administrative (CPJA) - Examen restreint

Procédure - Procédure de recours - Décision sur recours
Ouvrir la source officielle Texte complet (166 Articles) Version Markdown lisible par machine (.md)

Art. 96a CPJA · Examen restreint

1. L'autorité de recours examine avec retenue les décisions d'une autorité à laquelle la législation accorde une large marge d'appréciation.

2. Tel est le cas en particulier des décisions relatives à

a) l'évaluation du travail, des aptitudes et du comportement d'une personne;

b) l'octroi d'une prestation à laquelle la législation ne donne pas un droit.

← Art. 96 CPJA Code de procédure et de juridiction administrative (CPJA) - Objet du code Art. 97 CPJA →

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cette disposition s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez ce texte législatif avec la jurisprudence, la doctrine et les dispositions connexes dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Décisions judiciaires appliquant cette disposition (15)

601 2024 92 · fr (art. 96a al. 1 CPJA)
Appeal Against Refusal of Conditional Release Based on Reclassified Psychiatric Diagnosis
Cited to establish the standard of review for decisions where the authority has a wide margin of appreciation.
601 2024 92 · fr (art. 96a al. 2 let. a CPJA)
Appeal Against Refusal of Conditional Release Based on Reclassified Psychiatric Diagnosis
Cited to specify that decisions concerning the evaluation of work, aptitudes, and behavior are subject to restrained review.
601 2023 83 · fr (art. 96a al. 1 let. a CPJA)
Public Employment Status in Private Law Contract Dispute and Wrongful Dismissal Indemnity
Cited regarding the standard of review applied by the Court to the decision concerning the compensation.
601 2024 38 · fr (art. 96a al. 1 CPJA)
Appeal Dismissed: Continuation of Therapeutic Measure Justified by Non-Compliance and Insufficient Insight
Cited to indicate the standard of review applied to discretionary decisions.
601 2023 121 · fr (art. 96a al. 1 CPJA)
Teacher Termination Upheld Due to Confrontational Behavior
Cited in the reasoning section regarding the restricted review of decisions involving broad discretion, not cited in the final orders.
601 2022 46 · fr (art. 96a al. 1 CPJA)
Administrative Agent Dismissal Appeal and Work Certificate Revision
Cited regarding the court's restrained review of decisions where the authority has a wide margin of appreciation.
601 2021 148 · fr (art. 96a al. 1 CPJA)
Manager's Repeated Manual Time Entries Justify Immediate Termination for Breach of Trust
Used to frame the scope of review regarding the employer's decision based on the employee's behavior.
603 2021 133 · fr (Art. 96a VRG)
Cantonal Court Upholds Denial of COVID-19 Hardship Aid to Over-Indebted Bar-Dancing Establishment
Cited to establish the court's standard of review (restrained review of the discretionary decision based on Art. 7 Abs. 3 WMHV-COVID-19).
601 2020 193 · fr (art. 96a al. 1 CPJA)
Professor Dismissal Over Mental Health Incapacitation Upheld
Cited in the reasoning regarding the restrained review of discretionary decisions.
601 2019 108 · fr (art. 96a al. 1 CPJA)
Nurse Dismissal for Medication Error Upheld
The court applied this provision to state that the review of the decision, which is based on the employee's conduct, must be exercised with restraint.
601 2019 97 · fr (art. 96a al. 1 CPJA)
Scientific Collaborator Employment Termination Appeal
Cited to state that the appellate court exercises restraint when reviewing decisions where the authority has a wide margin of appreciation.
601 2019 129 · fr (Art. 96a al. 1 CPJA)
Manager Termination Upheld After Probationary Period
Cited to establish the standard of review with restraint for decisions involving a broad margin of appreciation.
601 2017 221 · fr (art. 96a al. 1 CPJA)
Public Agent Dismissal Procedural Delay Indemnity
Cited regarding the constrained review applied to decisions where the legislation grants a wide margin of appreciation.
601 2018 64 · fr (Art. 96a al. 1 CPJA)
Appeal Against Conditional Release Denial Based on Recidivism Risk Assessment
Used to establish that the appellate court examines decisions with broad discretion with restraint.
601 2015 138 · fr (Art. 96a al. 2 let. a CPJA)
Prisoner Leave Denial Upheld Due to Poor Conduct Record
Cited to define the scope of review regarding decisions related to the evaluation of a person's behavior.