Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
150.1 VRGCPJA CH-FR

Art. 77 Code de procédure et de juridiction administrative (CPJA) - Motifs de recours - En général

Procédure - Procédure de recours - Conditions préalables
Ouvrir la source officielle Texte complet (166 Articles) Version Markdown lisible par machine (.md)

Art. 77 CPJA · En général

1. Le recours peut être formé

a) pour violation du droit, y compris l'excès ou l'abus du pouvoir d'appréciation;

b) pour constatation inexacte ou incomplète des faits pertinents.

2 ...

← Art. 76 CPJA Code de procédure et de juridiction administrative (CPJA) - Objet du code Art. 78 CPJA →

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cette disposition s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez ce texte législatif avec la jurisprudence, la doctrine et les dispositions connexes dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Décisions judiciaires appliquant cette disposition (207)

601 2025 131 · fr (Art. 77 VRG)
Refusal to Extend Residence Permit Due to Reliance on Social Assistance Upheld
Procedural basis allowing the review of the decision, including misuse of discretion, for the appeal.
603 2025 130 · fr (art. 77 al. 1 CPJA)
Preventative License Withdrawal Upheld Due to Suspected Driver Incapacity
Cited to establish the basis for reviewing the merits of the appeal, though the court ultimately confirms the lower authority's decision.
601 2025 67 · fr (art. 77 al. 1 CPJA)
Cameroonian National v. Switzerland: Refusal of Medical Residence Permit Upheld Due to Insufficient Financial Means
Cited to define the scope of review concerning the violation of law for the appeal.
602 2024 43 · fr (art. 77 al. 1 CPJA)
Appeal Dismissed Regarding Unpermitted Agricultural Property Construction and Demolition Order
Cited when stating the grounds on which the appeal can be lodged before the Cantonal Court.
602 2025 31 · fr (Art. 77 VRG)
Property Owners Ordered to Submit Comprehensive Building Permit Application for Unpermitted Works
Cited to establish the grounds for appealing to the Cantonal Court (violation of law or incorrect determination of facts), which frames the entire review process, although the dismissal order itself cites no substantive ground.
601 2025 76 · fr (Art. 77 VRG)
Appeal Dismissed Against Refusal of EU/EFTA Residence Permit for Adult Son Lacking Proof of Dependency
Cited to confirm the scope of review for the appeal, allowing complaints regarding the violation of law or misuse of discretion.
602 2025 64 · fr (Art. 77 f. VRG)
Association Challenge to Administrative Costs Imposition
Mentioned as the basis for the inadmissibility of the claim of inappropriateness concerning the fee assessment, though the main decision confirmed the fee amount.
602 2024 83 · fr (art. 77 al. 1 CPJA)
Owner Challenges Massive Fill Removal Order on Agricultural Land
Cited to define the grounds upon which the Cantonal Tribunal can review the appeal (violation of law or incorrect fact-finding).
602 2025 59 · fr (Art. 77 VRG)
Owner Appeal Dismissed Regarding Gravel Lot Permit and Vehicle Storage Prohibition
Cited in the reasoning to define the grounds of appeal.
603 2024 180 · fr (Art. 77 f. VRG)
License Suspension Upheld Due to Breach of Reinstatement Conditions
Cited to confirm that the complaint regarding inappropriateness is excluded.
603 2024 105 · fr (art. 77 al. 1 CPJA)
Appeal Against License Withdrawal Pending Criminal Investigation on Traffic Violations
The court admitted the appeal based on the grounds for appeal provided in this article (violation of law or inexact fact finding), although this article was ultimately used to justify the admission of the appeal, which led to the annulment.
602 2024 79 · fr (art. 77 al. 1 CPJA)
Landowner Appeal of Soil Embankment Removal Order After Volume Exceedance
The ground for appeal based on violation of law was examined under this provision.
601 2023 156 · fr (art. 77 al. 1 CPJA)
Foreign National Residence Permit Non-Renewal Upheld Due to Social Assistance Dependency
Cited to establish the scope of the Tribunal's review of the appeal (violation of law).
603 2024 103 · fr (art. 77 al. 1 CPJA)
Driver's License Revocation Appeal Admissibility Review
Cited as the legal basis for recourse concerning the violation of law.
602 2024 22 · fr (Art. 77 VRG)
Building Permit Denial Upheld Due to Insufficient Sight Distance for Private Street Access
Cited as the general basis for challenging the lower court's decision regarding the violation of law or abuse of discretion.