Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
150.1 VRGCPJA CH-FR

Art. 66 Code de procédure et de juridiction administrative (CPJA) - Contenu

Procédure - Règles générales de procédure et procédure de première instance - La décision
Ouvrir la source officielle Texte complet (166 Articles) Version Markdown lisible par machine (.md)

Art. 66 CPJA · Contenu

1. La décision contient les indications suivantes

a) le nom de l'autorité qui a statué, et sa composition s'il s'agit d'une autorité collégiale de la juridiction administrative;

b) le nom des parties et de leurs mandataires;

c) la motivation;

d) le dispositif;

e) la date et la signature;

f) les voies de droit, soit le moyen de droit ordinaire qui est ouvert, l'autorité compétente pour en connaître et le délai pour l'utiliser.

2. Les décisions qui peuvent faire l'objet d'un recours au Tribunal fédéral doivent répondre aux exigences de l'article 112 de la loi fédérale du 17 juin 2005 sur le Tribunal fédéral.

3. Le Tribunal cantonal peut rendre ses jugements en ne communiquant que le dispositif. Il informe les parties que la rédaction de la motivation intégrale peut être demandée dans les trente jours dès la notification de celui-ci.

← Art. 65 CPJA Code de procédure et de juridiction administrative (CPJA) - Objet du code Art. 66a CPJA →

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cette disposition s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez ce texte législatif avec la jurisprudence, la doctrine et les dispositions connexes dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Décisions judiciaires appliquant cette disposition (14)

603 2024 103 · fr (art. 66 al. 1 let. f CPJA)
Driver's License Revocation Appeal Admissibility Review
Cited regarding the formal requirement for the administrative decision to indicate appeal remedies, which was missing.
605 2023 210 · fr (Art. 66 lit. a VRG)
Social Assistance Reduction Upheld Due to Failure to Pursue Subsidiarity Requirements
Cited in the reasoning to discuss the procedural requirement for decision composition, relevant to the rejection of procedural claims concerning Order I.
603 2024 27 · fr (art. 66 al. 1 let. c CPJA)
Appeal Dismissed: Upholding Dog Seizure and Five-Year Ownership Ban for Severe Animal Neglect
Cited in the context of the appellant's right to be heard (reasoning for the decision, not dispositive).
601 2023 61 · fr (Art. 66 Abs. 1 Bst. e VRG)
Termination of Administrative Employee for Persistent Performance and Conduct Failures
Cited in the context of rejecting a formal objection regarding the lack of an original signature on the decision.
601 2023 61 · fr (Art. 66 Abs. 1 Bst. f VRG)
Termination of Administrative Employee for Persistent Performance and Conduct Failures
Cited in the context of rejecting a formal objection regarding the lack of legal remedy instructions.
601 2017 152 · fr (Art. 66 al. 1 CPJA)
Foreign National Appeal Against Residence Permit Refusal Upheld
The Cantonal costs rule implied by order III, although not explicitly cited in the operative part, the ruling itself (costs) is determined by cantonal law referenced throughout the section on costs (Art. 66 CPJA is the general rule for costs, which implies Art. 66 al. 1 CPJA for determination).
601 2017 152 · fr (art. 66 al. 1 CPJA)
Foreign National Appeal Against Residence Permit Refusal Upheld
This provision governs cantonal court costs, which are explicitly ordered in point III.
608 2016 125 · fr (Art. 66 al. 1 CPJA)
Claimant v. Health Insurer and Compensation Fund (Restitution Procedure Violation)
Cited alongside Art. 29 al. 2 Cst to establish the requirement for decisions to be motivated, which was raised in the context of the complainant's argument regarding insufficient motivation of the decision to lift the opposition.
603 2017 46 · fr (Art. 66 Abs. 1 lit. c VRG)
Dismissal of Appeal Regarding Driving License Suspension for Traffic Violation
Cited in relation to the requirement for the authority to provide reasons, which was claimed to be violated by the appellant.
604 2016 79 · fr (art. 66 al. 1 let. e CPJA)
Tax Appeal Inadmissibility Due to Lack of Protected Interest
Cited in the reasoning to discuss the formal requirements for the decision, but the appeal on this point was rejected.
604 2016 79 · fr (art. 66 al. 1 let. f CPJA)
Tax Appeal Inadmissibility Due to Lack of Protected Interest
Cited in the reasoning to discuss the formal requirement for indicating legal remedies, but the appeal on this point was rejected.
602 2015 25 · fr (Art. 66 Abs. 1 lit. e VRG)
Property Owners' Appeal Against Restoration Order for Unpermitted Agricultural Zone Structures Dismissed
Mentioned in the context of addressing a formal defect (missing date) in the initial decision, although the court ultimately found the appeal timely.
605 2014 34 · fr (Art. 66 al. 1 CPJA)
Appeal Against Social Assistance Suppression and Non-Disclosure of Indemnity Payments
Although discussed in the reasoning regarding the notification of the suspension, this article was not explicitly cited in the final dispositive orders.
604 2010 3 · fr (Art. 66 VRG)
Business Operator v. Municipality Regarding Automatic Machine Tax Assessment
The appellant argued that the municipal decision violated this article concerning the required content of a decision (lack of proper party designation and operative part).