Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
150.1 VRGCPJA CH-FR

Art. 120 Code de procédure et de juridiction administrative (CPJA) - Recours contre les décisions incidentes

Juridiction administrative - Recours
Ouvrir la source officielle Texte complet (166 Articles) Version Markdown lisible par machine (.md)

Art. 120 CPJA · Recours contre les décisions incidentes

1. Les décisions incidentes sont susceptibles d'un recours séparé lorsqu'elles concernent la compétence, la récusation, la langue de la procédure, l'effet suspensif et l'assistance judiciaire gratuite.

2. Dans les autres cas, les décisions incidentes ne sont susceptibles d'un recours séparé que si elles sont de nature à causer un préjudice irréparable à une partie ou si l'admission du recours peut conduire immédiatement à une décision finale qui permet d'éviter une procédure probatoire longue et coûteuse.

3. Une décision incidente n'est en aucun cas sujette à recours, si la décision au fond ne l'est pas en elle-même. L'article 88 al. 2, 2e phr., est réservé.

← Art. 119 CPJA Code de procédure et de juridiction administrative (CPJA) - Objet du code Art. 121 CPJA →

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cette disposition s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez ce texte législatif avec la jurisprudence, la doctrine et les dispositions connexes dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Décisions judiciaires appliquant cette disposition (44)

602 2025 31 · fr (Art. 120 VRG)
Property Owners Ordered to Submit Comprehensive Building Permit Application for Unpermitted Works
Cited in the reasoning for admitting the appeal (E. 1.2), confirming the admissibility of appealing the interlocutory decision.
602 2025 59 · fr (Art. 120 VRG)
Owner Appeal Dismissed Regarding Gravel Lot Permit and Vehicle Storage Prohibition
Cited in the reasoning regarding the admissibility of the appeal against an interlocutory decision.
601 2025 42 · fr (art. 120 al. 2 CPJA)
Doctor's Interlocutory Appeal Against Suspension Dismissed for Lack of Irreparable Harm
The appeal was declared inadmissible because the decision being challenged was an interlocutory decision not listed in Art. 120 para. 1 CPJA, requiring proof of irreparable prejudice.
602 2024 187 · fr (art. 120 al. 2 CPJA)
Property Owners v. Territorial Development Authority Regarding Suspension of Development Plan Approval
Used to declare the appeal inadmissible because the decision was interlocutory and did not cause irreparable harm.
603 2024 78 · fr (Art. 120 Abs. 2 VRG)
Driving License Withdrawal Upheld Based on Drug Use Admission
Cited in the reasoning to establish the appellant's legitimacy to appeal against the interlocutory decision, relevant to the implicit admissibility discussed.
602 2023 123 · fr (art. 120 al. 2 CPJA)
Property Owner v. Administrative Decision Suspending Building Permit Based on Pending Legal Challenges to Development Plan
The court confirmed the admissibility of the appeal against the interlocutory decision based on this provision (which was cited in the reasoning leading to the decision to admit the appeal).
602 2023 155 · fr (Art. 120 al. 1 CPJA)
Construction Company vs. Prefecture: Improper Enforcement Against Contractor
Cited to confirm the procedural validity of the appeal, although this is a procedural admissibility point and not the main ground for the final order.
603 2023 151 · fr (Art. 76 und Art. 120 Abs. 2 VRG)
Administrative Revocation of Driving License for Cocaine Use Upheld
These provisions confirm the appellant's legal standing (legitimation) to file the appeal against the interlocutory decision.
601 2023 54 · fr (Art. 120 al. 1 CPJA)
Detainee Representative Access to File Appeal Dismissed on Lack of Irreparable Prejudice
This paragraph was cited in the reasoning regarding which incidental decisions are subject to immediate appeal.
601 2023 54 · fr (Art. 120 al. 2 CPJA)
Detainee Representative Access to File Appeal Dismissed on Lack of Irreparable Prejudice
This paragraph was cited in the reasoning regarding the condition of irreparable prejudice for an immediate appeal against an incidental decision.
602 2021 115 · fr (Art. 120 al. 1 CPJA)
Property Owner v. Prefectural Decision on Expert Recusal for Bias
This procedural rule governs the admissibility of appeals against interlocutory decisions, specifically citing decisions concerning recusal, which justified the court examining the merits of the appeal.
602 2021 121 · fr (art. 120 al. 2 CPJA)
Property Owners Appeal Against Ordinary Procedure Requirement for Substantial Unpermitted Alterations
This procedural rule on the admissibility of appeals against interlocutory decisions was used to frame the initial assessment of the appeal's receivability.
603 2021 117 · fr (art. 120 al. 1 CPJA)
Animal Welfare vs. Private Interest in Animal Seizure Appeal
Cited in the reasoning regarding the deadline for filing the appeal.
601 2021 32 · fr (art. 120 al. 1 CPJA)
Prison Disciplinary Sanction Appeal: Denial of Appointed Counsel
Cited in the reasoning to establish the appealability of the interlocutory decision concerning legal aid.
608 2020 118 · fr (art. 120 al. 1 CPJA)
Denial of Legal Aid for Insufficient Updated Financial Documentation
This rule was cited to confirm that the decision on legal aid was subject to a separate appeal.