Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
150.1 VRGCPJA CH-FR

Art. 106 Code de procédure et de juridiction administrative (CPJA) - Révision - Délais

Procédure - Procédures particulières
Ouvrir la source officielle Texte complet (166 Articles) Version Markdown lisible par machine (.md)

Art. 106 CPJA · Délais

1. La requête est adressée à l'autorité qui a pris la décision contestée dans les nonante jours dès la découverte du motif de révision, mais au plus tard dans les dix ans dès la notification de la décision. Ce dernier délai ne s'applique pas lorsque la révision est demandée pour un motif prévu à l'article 105 al. 2.

← Art. 105 CPJA Code de procédure et de juridiction administrative (CPJA) - Objet du code Art. 107 CPJA →

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cette disposition s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez ce texte législatif avec la jurisprudence, la doctrine et les dispositions connexes dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Décisions judiciaires appliquant cette disposition (7)

605 2021 219 · fr (art. 106 al. 3 CPJA)
Revision Granted for Previously Denied Left Wrist Injury Claim Due to Missed Fracture
Cited as the Cantonal procedural rule governing the procedure when the request for revision is accepted, leading to the modification of the previous decision.
605 2021 62 · fr (art. 106 al. 3 CPJA)
Revision Granted Due to Discredited Medical Expertise in Disability Claim
Cited in the reasoning as the procedural basis for the Court to rule anew (annul the prior decision and rule on the merits of the appeal) after admitting the revision request.
601 2020 86 · fr (Art. 106 VRG)
Immigration Permit Revocation and Improper Reconsideration Procedure
The court noted that the application was accepted because it was filed within the 90-day deadline provided by this article for revision applications.
605 2019 181 · fr (Art. 106 al. 3 du code fribourgeois du 23 mai 1991 de procédure et de juridiction administrative (CPJA; RSF 150.1))
Insured Denied Revision of Disability Denial Based on New Causation Theory
Cited as the cantonal procedural rule for the authority to rule anew if the revision is deemed well-founded, framing the court's procedural power in the context of the main review ground.
605 2018 120 · fr (Art. 106 al. 3 CPJA)
Disability Benefits Revision Based on Invalidated Medical Assessment
Cited as the procedural rule for the court to annul the contested decision and rule anew when admitting the request for revision.
608 2018 117 · fr (Art. 106 al. 3 CPJA)
Pension Revision Based on Invalidated Medical Expertise Due to Clinic Misconduct
Applied when the court decided to annul the previous decision and rule anew following the admission of the revision request.
605 2018 185 · fr (Art. 106 al. 1 CPJA)
Claimant Denied Unemployment Benefit Revision Based on Untimely Medical Evidence
Cited in the reasoning as a requirement for the petition, suggesting a procedural lapse, although not the final ground for rejection.