Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
150.1 VRGCPJA CH-FR

Art. 105 Code de procédure et de juridiction administrative (CPJA) - Révision - Motifs

Procédure - Procédures particulières
Ouvrir la source officielle Texte complet (166 Articles) Version Markdown lisible par machine (.md)

Art. 105 CPJA · Motifs

1. L'autorité de la juridiction administrative procède, sur requête, à la révision de sa décision lorsqu'une partie

a) allègue des faits ou produit des moyens de preuve nouveaux et importants, ou

b) prouve que l'autorité n'a pas tenu compte de faits importants établis par pièces, ou

c) établit que l'autorité a violé les dispositions relatives à la récusation ou au droit d'être entendu.

2. Elle procède en outre, d'office ou sur requête, à la révision de sa décision

a) lorsqu'un crime ou un délit l'a influencée, ou

b) lorsqu'une décision d'une juridiction internationale rendue dans la même affaire l'exige, notamment une décision de la Cour européenne des droits de l'homme.

3. Les motifs mentionnés à l'alinéa 1 n'ouvrent pas la révision lorsqu'ils eussent pu être invoqués dans la procédure précédant la décision ou par la voie du recours contre cette décision.

← Art. 104 CPJA Code de procédure et de juridiction administrative (CPJA) - Objet du code Art. 106 CPJA →

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cette disposition s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez ce texte législatif avec la jurisprudence, la doctrine et les dispositions connexes dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Décisions judiciaires appliquant cette disposition (20)

601 2020 111 · fr (Art. 105 al. 1 CPJA)
Foreign National Deportation Appeal After Annulled Marriage
This article was cited in the reasoning to define the specific grounds for revision relevant to the reconsideration request.
603 2021 73 · fr (Art. 105 al. 1 let. a CPJA)
Revision Denial for Previously Discoverable Facts in Land Allocation Dispute
This provision sets the ground for the court to review its decision based on new facts or evidence, which the court ultimately found inapplicable to the request.
603 2021 73 · fr (Art. 105 al. 3 CPJA)
Revision Denial for Previously Discoverable Facts in Land Allocation Dispute
This provision was used to exclude the revision because the alleged grounds could have been raised in the preceding procedure.
601 2020 86 · fr (Art. 105 Abs. 1 lit. a VRG)
Immigration Permit Revocation and Improper Reconsideration Procedure
The revision application was rejected because it lacked new, relevant facts or evidence under this provision.
605 2019 201 · fr (art. 105 al. 1 CPJA)
Rejection of Procedural Revision of Social Assistance Repayment Order Based on Acquittal
Although mentioned in the reasoning for admissibility checks, it is the basis for determining if a revision should proceed, specifically referencing its conditions (let. a and let. b).
605 2017 176 · fr (art. 105 al. 1 CPJA)
Insurance Benefits Procedural Revision Rejected Due to Reinterpretation of Known Facts
Cited to specify the conditions under which the administrative court proceeds with the revision of its decision.
601 2019 150 · fr (art. 105 al. 3 CPJA)
Unemployment Insurance Subrogation and Employment Law Compensation Revision
The request for revision was declared inadmissible because the ground raised (change in jurisprudence) could have been invoked during the appeal procedure.
601 2019 146 · fr (Art. 105 al. 1 CPJA)
Applicant v. Detention Facility (Civil Liability Compensation and Limitation Period)
Used as the primary basis for rejecting the revision request because the asserted grounds did not constitute new and important facts or evidence.
601 2017 64 · fr (art. 105 al. 1 CPJA)
Son's Appeal for Swiss Family Reunification Denied Due to Adulthood
Cited to define the grounds under which a revision can be requested.
602 2018 68 · fr (art. 105 ss du code fribourgeois du 23 mai 1991 de procédure et de juridiction administrative (CPJA; RSF 150.1))
Power Producer Turbine Replacement Permit Dispute
The petition was declared inadmissible because it did not meet the conditions for revision under these articles.
605 2018 185 · fr (Art. 105 al. 3 CPJA)
Claimant Denied Unemployment Benefit Revision Based on Untimely Medical Evidence
Cited as the relevant provision under which the request for procedural revision was interpreted.
605 2017 173 · fr (art. 105 al. 1 CPJA)
Applicant Seeks Procedural Revision Based on Reinterpreted Medical Evidence in Disability Claim
Cited to specify the conditions under which the administrative jurisdiction authority reviews its decision upon request.
603 2017 189 · fr (Art. 105 al. 1 let. a CPJA)
Denial of Revision for Alcohol-Related Driving Permit Revocation
The rejection of the revision request is based on the examination of whether the criteria for revision (new important facts or means of proof) under this article were met.
603 2017 189 · fr (Art. 105 al. 3 CPJA)
Denial of Revision for Alcohol-Related Driving Permit Revocation
Although not explicitly used to reject the request, the court's reasoning implicitly relies on the scope defined by this article regarding the inadmissibility of grounds that could have been raised previously.
605 2016 257 · fr (Art. 105 al. 1 let. a CPJA)
Denial of Revision for Insurance Benefits After Tick Bite Due to Improper New Evidence
Cited in the reasoning regarding the grounds for revision under cantonal law, but not in the final rejection order.