Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
130.1 JGLJ CH-FR

Art. 85 Loi sur la justice (LJ)

Compétence des autorités judiciaires - Juridiction pénale - Chambre pénale et Cour d'appel pénal
Ouvrir la source officielle Texte complet (179 Articles) Version Markdown lisible par machine (.md)

Art. 85 LJ

1. La Chambre pénale du Tribunal cantonal est l'autorité de recours au sens des articles 20 CPP et 7 al. 1 let. c PPMin.

2. La Cour d'appel pénal du Tribunal cantonal est la juridiction d'appel au sens des articles 21 CPP et 7 al. 1 let. d PPMin.

← Art. 84 LJ Loi sur la justice (LJ) - Objet - En général Art. 86 LJ →

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cette disposition s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez ce texte législatif avec la jurisprudence, la doctrine et les dispositions connexes dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Décisions judiciaires appliquant cette disposition (137)

502 2025 340 · fr (art. 85 al. 1 LJ)
Complainant Lacks Standing to Appeal Decision Not to Prosecute Veterinarian for Euthanasia
Cited as a procedural basis allowing an appeal against the order of non-entry into proceedings to the Cantonal Court.
502 2025 337 · fr (Art. 85 al. 1 LJ)
Prosecutor's Suspension of Proceedings Overruled Due to Withdrawn Complaint
Cited to establish that the Cantonal Court (Chambre) is the competent appeal authority in Fribourg.
502 2025 208 · fr (art. 85 al. 1 LJ)
Appeal Regarding Procedural Cost Allocation in Dismissed COVID Credit Fraud Case
Cited in the reasoning to establish the admissibility of the appeal to the Cantonal Court's Criminal Chamber.
502 2025 202 · fr (art. 85 al. 1 LJ)
Public Prosecutor Refusal to Open Proceedings Upheld in Social Assistance Repayment Dispute
Cited as a procedural basis allowing an appeal against the order of non-entry into proceedings.
502 2024 307 · fr (Art. 85 al. 1 LJ)
Public Prosecutor's Rejection of Criminal Complaint on Port Terminal Takeover Upheld Due to Lack of Mandate and Civil Nature of Dispute
Cited as the legal basis determining the composition and jurisdiction of the Cantonal Court chamber.
502 2025 84 · fr (art. 85 al. 1 LJ)
Prosecutor's Decision Overturned in Stadium Ban Defamation Appeal
Cited in the first dispositive order as a basis for the admissibility of the appeal against the decision to stay proceedings.
502 2025 154 · fr (Art. 85 al. 1 LJ)
Corporation v. Public Prosecutor (Refusal to Investigate Unfair Competition and Defamation)
Cited as the basis for the appeal being admissible before the Cantonal Court's Criminal Chamber.
502 2025 103 · fr (Art. 85 al. 1 LJ)
Seizure of Narcotics Unlawful, Blood Test Lawful
Cited alongside Art. 393 al. 1 let. a CPP to establish the admissibility of the appeal to the Chamber.
502 2025 49 · fr (art. 85 al. 2 LJ)
Company Appeal on Access to Investigation Report Admissibility Denied Due to Lack of Standing
Cited in the reasoning regarding the jurisdiction to hear the appeal, but not explicitly in the final orders (dispositive).
502 2025 5 · fr (art. 85 al. 1 LJ)
Appellant v. Public Prosecutor (Defamation and Malicious Denunciation Appeals)
Cited in conjunction with other articles to establish that the appeal against the dismissal order was admissible.
502 2025 98 · fr (art. 85 al. 1 LJ)
Appellant v. Public Prosecutor's Office (Forgery Appeal Involving Biogas Facility Documents)
This procedural provision was cited as a basis for the admissibility of the appeal to the Penal Chamber.
502 2025 13 · fr (art. 85 al. 1 LJ)
Appeal on Discrepancy Between Oral and Written Sentencing Disposition
Cited in the reasoning regarding the appeal against decisions of the lower courts.
502 2025 45 · fr (art. 85 al. 1 LJ)
Appellant Challenges Restriction of Residence Pending Investigation
This article establishes the court's competence to review substitution measures on appeal, referenced in section 1.1.
502 2024 201 · fr (Art. 85 al. 1 LJ)
Appeal Against Refusal to Prosecute Construction Director for Fraud and Coercion
Cited to confirm the admissibility of the appeal regarding the appeal route.
502 2024 321 · fr (Art. 85 al. 2 LJ)
Appeal Dismissed: Continued Detention for Serious Sexual Offenses Due to High Recidivism Risk
Cited in the reasoning to establish the Cantonal Court's Criminal Chamber as the competent appeal authority in Fribourg.