955.01 GWVOBAORD

CH

Art. 3 Verordnung vom 11. November 2015 über die Bekämpfung der Geldwäscherei und der Terrorismusfinanzierung (GwV) - Kreditgeschäft

GwV; 2. Kapitel: Finanzintermediäre

Originalquelle öffnen Gesamter Erlass (31 Artikel) Maschinenlesbares Markdown (.md)

Art. 3 GwV · Kreditgeschäft

Nicht als Kreditgeschäft nach Artikel 2 Absatz 3 Buchstabe a GwG gelten insbesondere: a. die Kreditnahme; b. die zins- und gebührenfreie Gewährung von Krediten; c. die Gewährung von Krediten zwischen Gesellschaft und Gesellschafterin oder Gesellschafter, sofern die Gesellschafterin oder der Gesellschafter eine Beteiligung von mindestens 10 Prozent des Kapitals oder der Stimmen an der Gesellschaft hält; d. die Gewährung von Krediten zwischen Arbeitgeber und Arbeitnehmerinnen oder Arbeitnehmern, sofern der Arbeitgeber verpflichtet ist, für die am Kreditverhältnis beteiligten Arbeitnehmerinnen und Arbeitnehmer Sozialversicherungsbeiträge zu leisten; e. Kreditverhältnisse zwischen einander nahestehenden Personen (Art. 7 Abs. 5); f. die Gewährung von Krediten, die akzessorisch zu einem anderen Rechtsgeschäft erfolgt; g. das Operating Leasing; h. Eventualverpflichtungen zugunsten Dritter; i. Handelsfinanzierungen, wenn deren Rückzahlung nicht durch die Vertragspartei erfolgt.

← Art. 2 GwV Verordnung vom 11. November 2015 über die Bekämpfung der Geldwäscherei und der Terrorismusfinanzierung (GwV) - Gegenstand Art. 4 GwV →

Gerichtsentscheide zu dieser Bestimmung (6)

A/3012/2020 · ge (Art. 3 Ord. 4)

Appeal Regarding Untimely Opposition to Supplementary Benefit Recalculation

The court ruled the procedure free of charge in order 3 of the dispositive.

A/737/2020 · ge (Art. 3. Ord. 3.)

Employer Obligation to Reimburse Work Initiation Allowances Following Termination Without Just Cause

The disposal orders explicitly state that the procedure is free of charge ('Dit que la procédure est gratuite'). While the specific article number for procedural costs in the dispositive is missing, the order itself refers to the status of the costs.

A/3736/2016 · ge (Art. 3 Comb. Ord. AI)

Deaf Individual's Appeal for Specific SIP Videophone Denied in Favor of Economical App Alternative

Cited in the reasoning as the basis for the right to auxiliary means, but not explicitly in the dispositive orders.

15.2013.97 · ti (Art. 3 ORD. 3)

Enforcement Decision on Salary Garnishment and Share Seizure Upheld

This order explicitly states that no costs (spese) are to be collected and no allowances (indennità) are to be awarded.

A/1804/2004 · ge (Art. 3 ORD. FIN. T.)

Pension Fund v. Insured Person (Disability Benefits and Reactive Depression)

This provision is not explicitly mentioned in the dispositive orders 1-4. However, the dispositive states: '3. Dit que la procédure est gratuite.' The article governing costs is typically Art. 66 al. 1 LTF or equivalent. Since the text only mentions 'Art. 3 ORD. FIN. T.' in the context of the ruling '3. Dit que la procédure est gratuite,' and given the strict instruction to only include explicitly cited provisions in the dispositive, and Art. 3 ORD. FIN. T. is not present, this point must be derived from the actual order text. Order 3 states: '3. Dit que la procédure est gratuite.' If there were an article cited for this, it would be included. Since no specific cost article (like Art. 66 LTF, which is not present) is cited for Order 3, I must strictly adhere to the visible citations in Orders 1-4. Order 3 only states the outcome without citing the legal basis for free proceedings.

INC.2002.47702 · ti (Art. 3 Art. 3 ord. 3.)

Provisional Release Granted Due to Insufficient Substantiation of Continued Pre-Trial Detention Necessity

This appears to be a typo/misinterpretation in the extraction tool regarding costs; based on context, Article 3 refers to the cost order, but the explicit legal citation for costs is missing from the P.Q.M. but the order states 'Non si percepiscono spese giudiziarie e non si assegnano ripetibili' (No judicial costs are perceived and no reimbursement is awarded). The closest applicable citation that might be intended in similar decisions regarding costs is often Art. 66 LTF (if this were federal court), but here no specific procedural article for costs is clearly provided in the P.Q.M. list other than the general cost statement in Order 3. Given the rules, only explicitly cited provisions in the P.Q.M. should be included. Since no standard cost provision (like Art. 66 LTF or its cantonal equivalent) is explicitly listed in the P.Q.M. citation block next to the numbered orders, I will omit this ambiguous reference unless a clear provision is found.