955.0
GWGLBALRD
CH
CH
Art. 37 Bundesgesetz vom 10. Oktober 1997 über die Bekämpfung der Geldwäscherei und der Terrorismusfinanzierung (GwG) - Verletzung der Meldepflicht
GwG; 6. Kapitel: Strafbestimmungen und Rechtspflege
Art. 37 GwG · Verletzung der Meldepflicht
Mit Busse bis zu 500 000 Franken wird bestraft, wer vorsätzlich die Meldepflicht nach Artikel 9 verletzt.
Wer fahrlässig handelt, wird mit Busse bis zu 150 000 Franken bestraft.
...
Gerichtsentscheide zu dieser Bestimmung (35)
SK.2025.23 (Art. 37 GwG)
Proceedings Dismissed for Expired Statute of Limitations in AML Reporting Case
The court used this provision to establish the offense of violating the reporting obligation.
BE.2025.18 (Art. 37 GwG)
Bank Documents Unsealed in Money Laundering Probe
Cited as the underlying offense for the investigation, leading to the request for unsealing.
CA.2024.1 (Art. 37 al. 1 LBA)
Appeal Dismissed: Anti-Money Laundering Reporting Violation Conviction Upheld
Cited as the legal basis for the conviction of intentional violation of the obligation to communicate.
B-6924/2023 (Art. 37 GwG)
Judicial Transparency in Administrative Criminal Proceedings
Cited as the underlying legal provision for the penalty order against the appellant, although not directly used in the dispositive of this appeal.
SK.2024.12 (art. 37 LBA)
Negligent AMLA Communication Violations Lead to Fines
Cited as the legal basis for the charge of violation of the duty to communicate.
SK.2024.12 (art. 37 al. 1 LBA)
Negligent AMLA Communication Violations Lead to Fines
Cited as the legal basis for the charge of intentional violation of the duty to communicate, though ultimately not applied due to lack of intent.
SK.2024.12 (art. 37 al. 2 LBA)
Negligent AMLA Communication Violations Lead to Fines
Used to find the defendants guilty of negligent violation of the duty to communicate regarding the F. business relationship.
CA.2023.31 (art. 37 al. 2 LBA)
Acquittal for AMLA Reporting Violations Due to Insufficient Evidence
This provision was used to acquit the defendant of the charge of violation by negligence of the obligation to communicate.
SK.2022.33 (art. 37 cpv. 1 LRD)
*Regulator v. Financial Intermediary (False Information & Communication Violations)*
This provision was used as the basis for finding the defendant guilty of violating the obligation to communicate.
SK.2022.47 (Art. 37 LBA)
Federal Criminal Court Upholds Reporting Obligation Violation Against Bank Compliance Head
Used to find the defendant guilty of intentionally violating the duty to communicate.
SK.2022.17 (art. 37 cpv. 1 LRD)
Asset Manager Penalized for Failure to Report Suspicious Transactions
This provision is the basis for the conviction, establishing the offense of intentional violation of the communication obligation.
CA.2021.14 (Art. 37 al. 1 LBA)
Appellate Court Acquits One Defendant on Statute of Limitations, Upholds Conviction and Fine for Second Defendant in Money Laundering Reporting Case
Used to convict B. of violating the duty to communicate and to impose a fine.
CA.2021.14 (Art. 37 al. 2 LBA)
Appellate Court Acquits One Defendant on Statute of Limitations, Upholds Conviction and Fine for Second Defendant in Money Laundering Reporting Case
Used to acquit A. of the charge of violating the duty to communicate.
SK.2020.39 (Art. 37 al. 1 LBA)
Swiss CEO and Compliance Head Convicted of Money Laundering Violations
This article is cited in the dispositive as the basis for recognizing defendant B. as guilty of violating the obligation to communicate.
SK.2020.39 (Art. 37 al. 2 LBA)
Swiss CEO and Compliance Head Convicted of Money Laundering Violations
This article is cited in the dispositive as the basis for recognizing defendant A. as guilty of violating the obligation to communicate.