951.31 KAGLPCCLICOL

CH

Art. 2 Bundesgesetz vom 23. Juni 2006 über die kollektiven Kapitalanlagen (KAG) - Geltungsbereich

KAG; 1. Titel: Allgemeine Bestimmungen; 1. Kapitel: Zweck und Geltungsbereich

Originalquelle öffnen Gesamter Erlass (166 Artikel) Maschinenlesbares Markdown (.md)

Art. 2 KAG · Geltungsbereich

Diesem Gesetz unterstellt sind, unabhängig von der Rechtsform: a. kollektive Kapitalanlagen und Personen, die diese aufbewahren; b. ausländische kollektive Kapitalanlagen, die in der Schweiz angeboten werden; c.–e. ... f. Personen, die in der Schweiz ausländische kollektive Kapitalanlagen vertreten.

Diesem Gesetz nicht unterstellt sind insbesondere: a. Einrichtungen und Hilfseinrichtungen der beruflichen Vorsorge, einschliesslich Anlagestiftungen; b. Sozialversicherungseinrichtungen und Ausgleichskassen; c. öffentlich-rechtliche Körperschaften und Anstalten; d. operative Gesellschaften, die eine unternehmerische Tätigkeit ausüben; e. Gesellschaften, die durch Stimmenmehrheit oder auf andere Weise eine oder mehrere Gesellschaften in einem Konzern unter einheitlicher Leitung zusammenfassen (Holdinggesellschaften); f. Investmentclubs, sofern deren Mitglieder in der Lage sind, ihre Vermögensinteressen selber wahrzunehmen; g. Vereine und Stiftungen im Sinne des Zivilgesetzbuches ; h. ...

...

Investmentgesellschaften in der Form einer schweizerischen Aktiengesellschaft unterstehen diesem Gesetz nicht, sofern sie an einer Schweizer Börse kotiert sind oder sofern: a. ausschliesslich Aktionärinnen und Aktionäre im Sinne von Artikel 10 Absätze 3 und 3 ter beteiligt sein dürfen; und b. die Aktien auf Namen lauten.

...

← Art. 1 KAG Bundesgesetz vom 23. Juni 2006 über die kollektiven Kapitalanlagen (KAG) - Zweck Art. 3–6 KAG →

Gerichtsentscheide zu dieser Bestimmung (108)

A/2228/2025 · ge (Art. 2 LPCC)

Benefit Recalculation and Moot Overpayment Claim

Cited in reasoning 3.2 as a condition for entitlement to cantonal supplementary benefits.

A/1319/2025 · ge (art. 2 al. 1 LPCC)

Applicant Denied Benefits Due to Lack of Habitual Residence in Geneva

This provision sets the cumulative conditions (domicile and habitual residence in the Canton of Geneva) for being entitled to cantonal complementary benefits, which forms the substantive basis for rejecting the claim.

A/801/2025 · ge (Art. 2 LPCC)

Claimant Must Repay Supplementary Benefits Due to Unreported Household Members and Rent Sharing Rule

Cited in the reasoning to define who is entitled to cantonal complementary benefits.

A/1829/2024 · ge (art. 2 al. 1 LPCC)

Appeal Regarding Termination of Supplementary Benefits Based on Habitual Residence

The court referenced this article concerning the conditions for entitlement to cantonal supplementary benefits, specifically the requirement of domicile and habitual residence in the Canton of Geneva.

A/3314/2024 · ge (art. 2 al. 1 let. a LPCC)

Restitution of Supplementary Benefits Based on Delayed Proof of Residence Change

The partial admission of the appeal and the modification of the restitution decision are based on the finding that the condition of domicile and habitual residence in the canton of Geneva was met for the period until October 31, 2022.

A/2798/2024 · ge (art. 2 al. 4 LPCC)

Appeal Regarding Recalculation of Supplementary Benefits Based on Imputed Pension and Asset Withdrawals

The court referenced this provision regarding the cantonal entitlement to supplementary benefits when professional pension capital is used for non-provision purposes, noting it was not examined by the lower authority.

A/2780/2023 · ge (Art. 2 al. 1 let. a LPCC)

Claimant Successfully Appeals Benefit Repayment Order Based on Disputed Domicile

Although cited in the reasoning regarding cantonal benefits, it does not appear in the dispositive orders.

A/4137/2023 · ge (art. 2 al. 3 LPCC)

Disability Pension Recipient Denied Supplementary Benefits Due to Invalid Residence Permit

The appeal was rejected because the appellant did not reside legally and without interruption in Geneva during the ten years preceding the application, as required for foreigners not from the EU/EFTA.

A/3795/2023 · ge (art. 2 al. 3 LPCC)

Claimant v. Denial of Supplementary Benefits Due to Insufficient Legal Residency

This article establishes the ten-year uninterrupted effective residency requirement in the Canton of Geneva for foreign nationals to receive cantonal complementary benefits, which was the core subject of the refusal for PCC.

A/4286/2022 · ge (art. 2 al. 1 let. a LPCC)

Supplementary Benefits Termination Over Habitual Residence Dispute

Cited as the basis for the right to cantonal supplementary benefits based on residence in the Canton of Geneva.

A/58/2022 · ge (art. 2 al. 1 let. a LPCC)

Heirs' Appeal of Supplementary Benefits Repayment Based on Deceased Recipient's Extended Stays

The decision rules on the entitlement to cantonal complementary benefits based on domicile and habitual residence in the Canton of Geneva, as per this provision.

A/3401/2021 · ge (Art. 2 LPCC)

Claimant v. Service: Restitution of Benefits Based on Reassessed Income Including Unpaid Maintenance

Cited in the reasoning to establish that the appellant was entitled to PCC based on her disability pension.

A/3494/2020 · ge (art. 2 al. 1 let. a LPCC)

Angolan National Residency Interruption Due to Stolen Documents

Cited implicitly through the reasoning in order 4, which concerns the conditions for cantonal supplementary benefits, requiring domicile and habitual residence in the Canton of Geneva.

A/2888/2021 · ge (art. 2 al. 3 LPCC)

Denial of Complementary Benefits to Foreign National Based on Insufficient Legal Residence Period

This provision establishes the ten-year continuous effective residence requirement in Geneva for foreigners, which was the basis for rejecting the claim in order 2.

A/3359/2021 · ge (art. 2 al. 3 LPCC)

Non-EU National's Intermittent Residence Bars Supplementary Benefits

Although cited in the reasoning, this provision is the cantonal substantive basis that was not met by the appellant, leading to the rejection of the claim.