Art. 1 Bundesgesetz vom 23. Juni 2006 über die kollektiven Kapitalanlagen (KAG) - Zweck

A/3122/2024 · ge (art. 1A al. 1 LPCC)

Settlement Payment Restitution for Supplementary Benefits Overpayment

The court confirmed the applicability of the federal asset threshold (Art. 9a LPC) to cantonal complementary benefits (PCC) based on this provision.

A/3975/2024 · ge (Art. 1A al. 2 LPCC)

Family Benefit Repayment Time-Barred Opposition and Remission Inquiry

This provision establishes the basis for the application of other relevant laws concerning family supplementary benefits, which is contextually relevant to the overall decision structure, although the main ground for rejection comes later.

A/3160/2023 · ge (art. 1A al. 1 LPCC)

Indemnity for Bodily Harm and Cantonal Supplementary Benefits Net Wealth Threshold

The court referenced this provision when confirming that the federal fortune threshold (LPC) applies to cantonal benefits in the absence of a specific cantonal provision (as established by prior case law mentioned in the reasoning).

A/2994/2023 · ge (art. 1 al. 2 LPCC)

Appeal Regarding Restitution of Erroneously Received Family Benefits Due to Undisclosed Income

Cited regarding the objective of PCFam (guaranteeing a minimum cantonal social assistance income).

A/2994/2023 · ge (art. 1A al. 2 LPCC)

Appeal Regarding Restitution of Erroneously Received Family Benefits Due to Undisclosed Income

Cited to determine the applicable legal provisions for family supplementary benefits (PCFam).

A/1305/2023 · ge (art. 61 let. g LPGA cum art. 1A al. 2 let. c LPCC)

Appeal Against Hypothetical Income Imposition in Family Supplementary Benefits Calculation

Cited for ordering the respondent to pay the appellant costs and legal fees because the appeal was partially granted.

A/1839/2023 · ge (Art. 1A LPCC)

Appeal Against Reimbursement Order for Overpaid Benefits

Cited in consideration 3 to establish the application of LPGA by analogy for cantonal supplementary benefits when the LPC is silent.

A/4170/2022 · ge (Art. 1A LPCC)

Appeal Dismissed for Supplementary Benefits Due to Exceeding Asset Threshold Despite Alleged Scam Loss and Property Donation

Cited in consideration 2 regarding the application of LPGA provisions by analogy to cantonal supplementary benefits.

A/4170/2022 · ge (Art. 1A al. 1 LPCC)

Appeal Dismissed for Supplementary Benefits Due to Exceeding Asset Threshold Despite Alleged Scam Loss and Property Donation

Cited in consideration 12.5 as referring to LPC provisions regarding the maximum net wealth threshold for entitlement to cantonal supplementary benefits.

A/4278/2022 · ge (Art. 1A al. 1 LPCC)

Beneficiary's Entitlement Cessation After 2021 Supplementary Benefits Reform

This provision, referencing the LPC in case of silence in the cantonal law, was used to justify applying the federal fortune threshold criteria to the cantonal supplementary benefits.

A/3394/2022 · ge (art. 1A al. 1 let. b LPCC)

Pension Overpayment Restitution Waiver Refused Due to Lack of Good Faith

Cited in connection with the admissibility of the appeal regarding cantonal complementary benefits (PCC).

A/2094/2022 · ge (Art. 1A al. 2 LPCC)

Claimant v. Administration Regarding Recalculation of Family Supplementary Benefits

Defines the regulations governing PCFam.

A/865/2022 · ge (art. 1A al. 1 LPCC)

Supplementary Pension Benefits and Asset Valuation for Eligibility

Cited in the reasoning for applying the federal threshold (Art. 9a LPC) to Cantonal Supplementary Benefits (PCC) via cross-reference.

A/1040/2022 · ge (art. 1A al. 1 LPCC)

Appeal Regarding Inclusion of CHF 100,000 in Assets for Benefit Eligibility

This provision is cited as the basis for the applicability of the federal LPC to cantonal supplementary benefits, informing the legal framework used for the review.

A/2132/2022 · ge (art. 1A al. 1 let. b LPCC)

Social Benefits Denial Upheld Due to Exceeding Income and Wealth Thresholds

Cited in the reasoning to confirm the applicability of cantonal rules for PCC, which supports the main order rejecting the appeal.