943.02
BGBMLMI
CH
CH
Art. 5 Bundesgesetz vom 6. Oktober 1995 über den Binnenmarkt (BGBM) - Öffentliche Beschaffungen
BGBM
Art. 5 BGBM · Öffentliche Beschaffungen
Die öffentlichen Beschaffungen durch Kantone, Gemeinden und andere Träger kantonaler oder kommunaler Aufgaben richten sich nach kantonalem oder interkantonalem Recht. Diese Vorschriften und darauf gestützte Verfügungen dürfen Personen mit Niederlassung oder Sitz in der Schweiz nicht in einer Weise benachteiligen, welche Artikel 3 widerspricht. Stützt sich eine Beschaffung oder die Übertragung einer Monopolnutzung auf die Interkantonale Vereinbarung, welche die Kantone aufgrund des Protokolls vom 30. März 2012 zur Änderung des Übereinkommens über das öffentliche Beschaffungswesen abschliessen, so wird vermutet, dass die Anforderungen dieses Gesetzes eingehalten werden.
Kantone und Gemeinden sowie andere Träger kantonaler und kommunaler Aufgaben sorgen dafür, dass die Vorhaben für umfangreiche öffentliche Einkäufe, Dienstleistungen und Bauten sowie die Kriterien für Teilnahme und Zuschlag amtlich publiziert werden. Sie berücksichtigen dabei die vom Bund eingegangenen staatsvertraglichen Verpflichtungen.
Gerichtsentscheide zu dieser Bestimmung (60)
60/2003/16 · sh (Art. 3 und Art. 5 BGBM)
Municipality's Flawed School Renovation Contract Award Due to Procedural Errors and Unfair Criteria
The violation of the principle of non-discrimination and equal treatment in the award process, as detailed in the reasoning, underpins the final finding of illegality.
AGVE.2001.75 · ag (Art. 5 Abs. 2 und 9 BGBM)
Wastewater Treatment Company Subject to Public Procurement Laws
These provisions of the Federal Act on the Internal Market are applicable to A. AG as a carrier of cantonal or municipal tasks, requiring compliance with public procurement rules.
AGVE.2001.69 · ag (Art. 5 Abs. 2 BGBM)
Network Modernization Contract Awarded Directly Violates Tender Rules
Cited to support the requirement for public tenders for extensive public purchases.
VB.1999.00359 · zh (Art. 5 lit. I BGBM)
Improper Use of Residency and Transparency in School Renovation Contract Award
This provision likely forms the substantive basis for the court's finding regarding the impermissibility of local residency as a criterion, which is central to the final order.
VB.2002.00293 · zh (Art. 5 lit. I BGBM)
State Church Organization Procurement Law Applicability
This provision is cited in the 'Rechtsnormen' section, which often details the legal basis relevant to the case, though its direct application in the dispositive needs confirmation. However, in the absence of a numbered dispositive outlining the final orders (beyond the initial summary in the title/subject which states 'Nichteintreten'), this listed legal norm is the most likely candidate for the basis of the decision regarding the scope of submission law.
VB.2008.00555 · zh (Art. 5 Abs. I BGBM)
Challenge to Negotiated Procedure Award Based on Implied Invitation
This provision, along with others, forms the legal basis for the final decision concerning the public procurement issue.
602 2025 67 · fr (art. 5 LMI)
Municipality Unlawfully Restricted Market Access in School Transport Contract Award
The court explicitly declared that the municipal award decision illegally restricted market access, constituting a violation of this article.
602 2024 92 · fr (Art. 3 Abs. 1 i.V.m. Art. 5 Abs. 1 BGBM)
Competition Commission v. Municipal Contract Award
The court found that restricting the circle of potential bidders by using the wrong procedure violated the principle of non-discrimination under this provision.
602 2024 92 · fr (Art. 5 BGBM)
Competition Commission v. Municipal Contract Award
The court explicitly found that the procurement conclusion, the award based on the contractor's variant, and the rejections violated this article by unlawfully restricting market access.
27893 · nw (Art. 5 Abs. 1 BGBM)
Construction Contract Award Dispute Regarding Bid Scoring Criteria
Cited in reasoning to establish that public procurement is governed by cantonal or intercantonal law.
VB.2021.00095 · zh (Art. 5 BGBM)
Federal Competition Commission v. Procurement Authority on Non-Discrimination and Impartiality in Tendering
The court found a violation of the principle of non-discrimination in the sense of this article.
p/Nr/60/2018/23/p · sh (Art. 5 Abs. 2 EG BGBM)
Unlawful Public Procurement Award Due to Lack of Disclosure and Impermissible Bid Modification
Cited regarding the awarding authority's liability for damages within secondary judicial protection.
p/Nr/60/2018/23/p · sh (Art. 5 Abs. 3 EG BGBM)
Unlawful Public Procurement Award Due to Lack of Disclosure and Impermissible Bid Modification
Cited for the determination of party compensation by the court, which is granted against the awarding authority.
60/2003/50 · sh (Art. 5 BGBM)
Procuring Entity's Award Decision Upheld After Cured Reasoning on Lower Out-of-Canton Bid
Cited in the reasoning regarding the principle of non-discrimination and equal treatment of providers.
60/2004/38 · sh (Art. 5 Abs. 2 EG BGBM)
Challenge to Unlawful Direct Award of Castle Renovation Services
Cited as the basis for ordering that the respondent municipality (who pursued its own interests with the flawed award) must bear three-quarters of the proceedings costs.