943.02 BGBMLMI

CH

Art. 3 Bundesgesetz vom 6. Oktober 1995 über den Binnenmarkt (BGBM) - Beschränkung des freien Zugangs zum Markt

BGBM

Originalquelle öffnen Gesamter Erlass (16 Artikel) Maschinenlesbares Markdown (.md)

Art. 3 BGBM · Beschränkung des freien Zugangs zum Markt

Ortsfremden Anbieterinnen und Anbietern darf der freie Zugang zum Markt nicht verweigert werden. Beschränkungen sind in Form von Auflagen oder Bedingungen auszugestalten und nur zulässig, wenn sie: a. gleichermassen auch für ortsansässige Personen gelten; b. zur Wahrung überwiegender öffentlicher Interessen unerlässlich sind; und c. verhältnismässig sind.

Nicht verhältnismässig sind Beschränkungen insbesondere, wenn: a. der hinreichende Schutz überwiegender öffentlicher Interessen bereits durch die Vorschriften des Herkunftsortes erreicht wird; b. die Nachweise und Sicherheiten, welche die Anbieterin oder der Anbieter bereits am Herkunftsort erbracht hat, genügen; c. zur Ausübung einer Erwerbstätigkeit vorgängig die Niederlassung oder der Sitz am Bestimmungsort verlangt wird; d. der hinreichende Schutz überwiegender öffentlicher Interessen durch die praktische Tätigkeit gewährleistet werden kann, welche die Anbieterin oder der Anbieter am Herkunftsort ausgeübt hat.

Beschränkungen, die nach Absatz 1 zulässig sind, dürfen in keinem Fall eine verdeckte Marktzutrittsschranke zu Gunsten einheimischer Wirtschaftsinteressen enthalten.

Über Beschränkungen ist in einem einfachen, raschen und kostenlosen Verfahren zu entscheiden.

← Art. 2 BGBM Bundesgesetz vom 6. Oktober 1995 über den Binnenmarkt (BGBM) Art. 4 BGBM →

Gerichtsentscheide zu dieser Bestimmung (85)

60/2003/16 · sh (Art. 3 und Art. 5 BGBM)

Municipality's Flawed School Renovation Contract Award Due to Procedural Errors and Unfair Criteria

The violation of the principle of non-discrimination and equal treatment in the award process, as detailed in the reasoning, underpins the final finding of illegality.

BGE 134 II 329 (Art. 3 Abs. 1 lit. c BGBM)

Intercantonal market access under BGBM for lawyers: five-year in-canton practice requirement for training stipendiaires disproportionate.

Requires restrictions on market access to comply with proportionality, which the challenged cantonal rule violated.

BGE 134 II 329 (Art. 3 Abs. 4 BGBM)

Intercantonal market access under BGBM for lawyers: five-year in-canton practice requirement for training stipendiaires disproportionate.

Cited to clarify that the gratuitous procedure applies only to first-instance decisions and not to appeal procedures.

VB.2007.00323 · zh (Art. 3 BGBM)

Psychotherapist Licensing Disparity Between Cantons

This article determines whether the restriction of market access is permissible, although the court ultimately based its ruling on the equivalence found under Art. 2 BGBM.

VPB 2004.2321 (Art. 3 LMI)

Swiss Internal Market Law Revision

This article was used to allow restrictions on market access under certain conditions, specifically related to proportionality and the consideration of professional experience.

VPB 2000.2139 (art. 3, al. 2, LMI)

Report on Swiss Internal Market Act's Limited Impact on Service and Person Mobility

Cited as the provision allowing cantons to restrict market access under certain conditions for the preservation of predominant public interests.

VPB 2000.2139 (art. 3, al. 3, let. a, LMI)

Report on Swiss Internal Market Act's Limited Impact on Service and Person Mobility

Cited as the provision under which cantons can prove that protection cannot be achieved by regulations in the canton of origin, allowing them to oppose market access.

ZZ.1998.35 · so (Art. 3 Abs. 2 lit. e BGBM)

Notary Licensing Requirements Versus Freedom of Trade

Cited in the reasoning regarding the cantonal competence to impose conditions under the Federal Act on the Internal Market.

VB.2002.00255 · zh (Art. 3 lit. I BGBM)

Public Procurement: Permissibility and Limitation of Apprentice Training as Award Criterion

This article is cited in the list of legal norms, implying its potential relevance or use, although the dispositive itself is not fully visible to confirm direct application in the final orders beyond the listed costs/procedure.

VB.2002.00255 · zh (Art. 3 lit. II d BGBM)

Public Procurement: Permissibility and Limitation of Apprentice Training as Award Criterion

This article is cited in the list of legal norms, implying its potential relevance or use, although the dispositive itself is not fully visible to confirm direct application in the final orders beyond the listed costs/procedure.

VB.2007.00323 · zh (Art. 3 BGBM)

Psychotherapy License Denial and Equivalent Regulations

Determines whether restrictions on market access are permissible.

VB.2008.00555 · zh (Art. 3 BGBM)

Challenge to Negotiated Procedure Award Based on Implied Invitation

This provision, along with others, forms the legal basis for the final decision concerning the public procurement issue.

602 2024 92 · fr (Art. 3 Abs. 1 i.V.m. Art. 5 Abs. 1 BGBM)

Competition Commission v. Municipal Contract Award

The court found that restricting the circle of potential bidders by using the wrong procedure violated the principle of non-discrimination under this provision.

5V 24 102 · lu (Art. 3 Abs. 4 BGBM)

WEKO Appeal on Mandatory Health Insurance Authorization Fees Upheld

The basis for the appeal regarding the alleged violation of the right to a free procedure, although ultimately ruled inapplicable in the dispositive.

60/2023/11 · sh (Art. 3 EG BGBM)

Public Tender Award Challenge Concerning Timeliness, Evaluation Criteria, and Incomplete Bidding

Cited in the context of the duty of the parties to present necessary submissions within the deadline, relating to the timeliness of objections.