941.31
EMKGLCMP
CH
CH
Art. 45 Bundesgesetz vom 20. Juni 1933 über die Kontrolle des Verkehrs mit Edelmetallen und Edelmetallwaren (EMKG)
EMKG; Siebenter Abschnitt: Strafbestimmungen; 1. Widerhandlungen; b. Fälschung und Verfälschung von Stempeln
Art. 45 EMKG
Mit Freiheitsstrafe bis zu drei Jahren oder Geldstrafe wird bestraft, wer vorsätzlich: a. amtliche schweizerische, ausländische oder internationale Stempel, Punzen oder Stempelzeichen fälscht oder verfälscht; b. solche Zeichen verwendet; c. Geräte zum Fälschen oder Verfälschen solcher Zeichen anfertigt, sich verschafft oder an Dritte abgibt.
Handelt der Täter fahrlässig, so wird er mit Busse bis zu 50 000 Franken bestraft.
Artikel 246 des Strafgesetzbuches ist nicht anwendbar.
Gerichtsentscheide zu dieser Bestimmung (17)
CDP.2011.212 · ne (art. 45 al. 2 LCMP)
Public Body's Concealed Pre-Award Contract Execution Vitiates Re-Award Decision
Basis for declaring the award decision unlawful because the contract was already fully executed.
CDP.2011.212 · ne (art. 45 al. 2 LCMP)
Public Body's Concealed Pre-Award Contract Execution Vitiates Re-Award Decision
Cited in the dispositive (Order 1) to declare the decision unlawful.
CDP.2011.212 · ne (art. 45 al. 2 LCMP)
Public Body's Concealed Pre-Award Contract Execution Vitiates Re-Award Decision
Cited in the reasoning (4.b), but not in the dispositive.
CDP.2011.212 · ne (art. 45 al. 2 LCMP)
Public Body's Concealed Pre-Award Contract Execution Vitiates Re-Award Decision
Cited in the reasoning for the decision structure, but not in the final numbered orders (1, 2, 3).
CDP.2011.212 · ne (art. 45 al. 2 LCMP)
Public Body's Concealed Pre-Award Contract Execution Vitiates Re-Award Decision
Cited regarding the consequence that the court should have only established the illegality of the decision rather than referring the case back.
CDP.2011.212 · ne (art. 45 al. 2 LCMP)
Public Body's Concealed Pre-Award Contract Execution Vitiates Re-Award Decision
Cited regarding the non-justification of further procedural acts (related to Art. 43 LPJA/Art. 41 LCMP application context).
TA.2004.170 · ne (art. 45 al.2 LCMP)
Municipality Tender Transparency Violation and Illicit Award Decision
Used as the basis for the final order to merely declare the challenged award decision illicit because the contract had already been concluded.
TA.2004.109 · ne (art.45 al.2 LCMP)
Sanitation Contract Award Challenge Due to Flawed Evaluation and Lack of Transparency
Used to declare the disputed award illicit because the contract had already been concluded.
TA.2002.411 · ne (Art. 45 al.2 LCMP)
Consortium Appeal Against Unlawful Contract Award Over Rejected Variant Offer
Used to justify limiting the consequence of the admitted appeal to declaring the award illicit because a contract was already concluded.
TA.2001.330 · ne (art.45 al.2 LCMP)
Appeal Against Engineering Mandate Award Due to Procedural Flaws
The court declared the challenged award decision illicit because the contract had already been concluded.
TA.2003.284 · ne (art.45 al.2 LCMP a contrario)
School Committee Contract Award Annulled Due to Bidder Participation in Specification Drafting
The court ordered the annulment of the award decision based on this provision (as reasoned in consideration 5).
TA.2003.226 · ne (art.45 al.2 LCMP)
Bidder Challenge to Public Contract Award Dismissed on Basis of Motivation and Discretionary Evaluation
Cited to explain the court's limitation to simply note the illicit nature of the decision when a contract has already been concluded.
TA.2002.291 · ne (art.45 al.2 LCMP)
Improper Bid Exclusion and Unlawful Contract Award
Cited as the basis for the Tribunal to only declare the adjudication illicit because the contract had already been concluded.
TA.2002.453 · ne (art.45 al.2 LCMP)
Appeal Against Unlawful Municipal Contract Award Based on Disproportionate Weighting of Undefined Criteria
The court declared the challenged award illicit because the contract had already been concluded.
TA.2002.176 · ne (art.45 al.2 LCMP)
Public Procurement Award Unlawful Due to Undisclosed Sub-Criteria
Used to limit the court's ruling to declaring the challenged award illicit because the contract was already concluded.