941.31
EMKGLCMP
CH
CH
Art. 41 Bundesgesetz vom 20. Juni 1933 über die Kontrolle des Verkehrs mit Edelmetallen und Edelmetallwaren (EMKG)
EMKG; Fünfter Abschnitt: Organisation; Handelsprüfer; a. Berufsausübungsbewilligung . Obliegenheiten
Art. 41 EMKG
Der Handelsprüfer bedarf einer Berufsausübungsbewilligung des Zentralamtes. Voraussetzung ihrer Erteilung ist der Besitz eines eidgenössischen Probiererdiploms, Wohnsitz in der Schweiz und guter Leumund. Die Erwerbung einer Schmelz- oder Ankaufsbewilligung ist den Handelsprüfern gestattet. Die Handelsprüfer leisten vor dem Zentralamt den Eid oder das Gelübde auf getreue Erfüllung ihrer Berufspflichten. Sie sind befugt, die Feingehaltsbestimmung von Schmelzprodukten vorzunehmen und beziehen dafür als Entgelt die in der Vollziehungsverordnung vorgesehenen Gebühren. Die amtliche Prüfung und Punzierung von Edelmetallwaren ist ihnen untersagt.
Gerichtsentscheide zu dieser Bestimmung (56)
CDP.2022.218 · ne (art. 41 LCMP)
Railway Remote Control System Contract Award Appeal Rejected
Cited in conjunction with LPJA articles concerning costs and indemnity for costs due to the nature of the public law case.
CDP.2022.218 · ne (art. 47 al. 1 LPJA par renvoi de l’art. 41 LCMP)
Railway Remote Control System Contract Award Appeal Rejected
Applied to order the appellant to bear the costs of the procedure because the appeal was rejected.
CDP.2022.218 · ne (art. 48 al. 1 LPJA par renvoi de l’art. 41 LCMP)
Railway Remote Control System Contract Award Appeal Rejected
Applied to rule that the appellant is not entitled to an indemnity for legal costs.
CDP.2022.165 · ne (art. 41 [LCMP])
Bid Challenge Over Roofing Contract Dismissed Due to Incomplete Documentation
Cited in the dispositive orders concerning the costs application by reference via art. 47 al. 1 LPJA.
CDP.2021.230 · ne (art. 47 al. 1 LPJA par renvoi de l’art. 41 LCMP)
Challenge to Urban Waste Collection Contract Award Upheld
Applied to impose costs on the appellant because they lost the appeal.
CDP.2021.230 · ne (art. 48 al. 1 LPJA par renvoi de l’art. 41 LCMP)
Challenge to Urban Waste Collection Contract Award Upheld
Applied to deny costs (indemnité de dépens) to the appellant and the interested third party.
CDP.2021.174 · ne (art. 48 al. 1 [LPJA], par renvoi de l'art. 41 [LCMP])
Procurement Challenge Regarding Waste Collection Services Award Upheld Due to Non-Compliant Bid Modification
Used to grant costs to the interested third party because the appeal was rejected.
CDP.2020.270 · ne (art. 47 al. 1 [LPJA], par renvoi de l'art. 41 [LCMP])
Waste Collection Tender Transparency and Award Challenge
Imposes the costs of the final decision on the unsuccessful appellant.
CDP.2020.270 · ne (art. 48 al. 1 [LPJA], par renvoi de l'art. 41 [LCMP])
Waste Collection Tender Transparency and Award Challenge
Rules against awarding costs to the interested third party and the respondent.
CDP.2020.270 · ne (art. 48 al. 1 a contrario [LPJA], par renvoi de l’art. 41 [LCMP])
Waste Collection Tender Transparency and Award Challenge
Rules against awarding costs to the appellant for their activity on the final decision.
CDP.2019.358 · ne (art. 41 LCMP)
Contract Award Re-Tender Challenge
Cited in the reasoning for the application of procedural rules concerning costs and fees.
CDP.2019.141 · ne (art. 47 al. 1 LPJA par le renvoi de l'art. 41 LCMP)
Bidder Challenge to Hospital Laundry Tender Requirements Upheld
Provision used to order the appellant to bear the costs of the procedure after rejecting the appeal.
CDP.2019.141 · ne (art. 48 al. 1 a contrario LPJA par renvoi de l'art. 41 LCMP)
Bidder Challenge to Hospital Laundry Tender Requirements Upheld
Provision used to rule without awarding costs/legal fees (dépens) to the opposing party.
CDP.2018.308 · ne (art. 41 LCMP)
Bidder Exclusion in Public Tender Over Formal Deficiencies and Insufficient Reasoning
Cited in conjunction with LPJA articles regarding the decision not to charge costs and the award of legal costs.
CDP.2018.390 · ne (Art. 47 al. 1 [LPJA] par le renvoi de l’art. 41 [LCMP])
Canton Insurance Tender Exclusion Upheld for Missing Tax Attestation
Provision applied to impose the costs of the procedure on the appellant who lost the case.