Art. 27 Bundesgesetz vom 20. Juni 1986 über die Jagd und den Schutz wildlebender Säugetiere und Vögel (JSG) - Aufhebung und Änderung von Bundesgesetzen

34.2001.41 · ti (Art. 27 LCP (new version))

Pension Supplement Reduction Based on New Early Retirement Law

Cited in the reasoning to show the applicable rule, but only the specific paragraph used for the decision (cpv. 4) is relevant for inclusion if cited in the dispositive. Since the dispositive refers to the rejection of the petition based on the finding that the reduction under art. 27 cpv. 4 LCP was correct, this provision is the core ground.

34.2001.41 · ti (Art. 27 LCP (old version))

Pension Supplement Reduction Based on New Early Retirement Law

Cited in the reasoning for background comparison, but not in the final orders, so it is excluded.

34.2001.41 · ti (Art. 27 cpv. 4 LCP (new version))

Pension Supplement Reduction Based on New Early Retirement Law

Although the dispositive does not explicitly cite the article again in order 1, the entire decision hinges on the confirmation of the communication based on this article (see Rationale 2.8 and Dispositive 2). Since the substantive ground for rejecting the petition relies exclusively on the application of this article, it must be included as the main ground.

34.2001.41 · ti (art. 27 cpv. 1, 2, 3, 5 LCP (new version))

Pension Supplement Reduction Based on New Early Retirement Law

Cited in the reasoning to show the full text of the modified article, but only cpv. 4 is the operative basis for the dispute and is cited in the context of the decision's subject.

34.2001.41 · ti (art. 27 cpv. 4 LCP)

Pension Supplement Reduction Based on New Early Retirement Law

This article was the legal basis for reducing the supplementary allowance, which the court upheld by rejecting the petition.

34.2001.42 · ti (Art. 27 LCP)

Insured Person v. Pension Fund: Early Retirement Bridging Pension Supplement Reduction Lawful

Cited in the reasoning to contrast the old and new versions of the law, which provided the context for the application of Art. 27 para. 4 LCP.

34.2001.42 · ti (art. 27 cpv. 4 LCP)

Insured Person v. Pension Fund: Early Retirement Bridging Pension Supplement Reduction Lawful

This provision, concerning the reduction of the supplementary substitute payment by analogy with early old-age pension provisions of the LAVS, was the legal basis for the reduction challenged by the petitioner and confirmed by the court's rejection of the petition.

34.2001.75 · ti (art. 27 cpv. 4 LCP)

Pension Benefit Reduction Based on New Legislation

This provision is the substantive legal basis for the reduction of the supplementary benefit which the court upheld by rejecting the petition.

34.2001.40 · ti (art. 27 cpv. 4 LCP)

Insured vs. Statutory Reduction of Substitute Pension Supplement

This article is the legal basis cited by the Pension Fund for reducing the supplementary benefit, and the court confirmed its applicability by rejecting the petition.

34.2001.26 · ti (art. 27 cpv. 4 LCP)

Insured Person v. Reduction of Supplementary Benefit under New Pension Law

This article, concerning the reduction of the substitute supplement by analogy with early retirement provisions of the LAVS, is the primary legal basis for the decision to reject the petition and uphold the reduction.

34.2001.27 · ti (Art. 27 cpv. 4 LCP)

Supplementary Pension Reduction Following Law Change Upheld

The petition was rejected based on the application of the new Art. 27 para. 4 LCP to all beneficiaries.

34.2001.27 · ti (art. 27 cpv. 4 LCP)

Supplementary Pension Reduction Following Law Change Upheld

The court confirmed the legality of applying this provision to all beneficiaries, leading to the rejection of the petition.

34.2001.25 · ti (art. 27 cpv. 4 LCP)

Pension Benefit Reduction Following Legislative Change Upheld

This is the provision authorizing the reduction of the substitute supplement, which was the core subject of the dispute, and its application was confirmed in the final order.

34.2000.54 · ti (Art. 27 cpv. 4 LCP)

Retiree Challenge to Substitute Supplementary Benefit Reduction Upheld

This provision concerning the reduction of the substitute supplement, which was the subject of the dispute, was applied by being upheld in the rejection of the petition.

34.2000.55 · ti (art. 27 cpv. 4 LCP)

Supplementary Early Retirement Payment Reduction Challenge

This provision is the primary legal basis for the reduction of the substitute supplement, which is the subject of the appeal, and the court confirmed its application in order 2.