922.0 JSGLCHPLCP

CH

Art. 18 Bundesgesetz vom 20. Juni 1986 über die Jagd und den Schutz wildlebender Säugetiere und Vögel (JSG) - Übertretungen

JSG; 7. Abschnitt: Strafbestimmungen

Originalquelle öffnen Gesamter Erlass (32 Artikel) Maschinenlesbares Markdown (.md)

Art. 18 JSG · Übertretungen

Mit Busse bis zu 20 000 Franken wird bestraft, wer vorsätzlich und ohne Berechtigung: a. jagdbare Tiere einfängt, gefangen hält, sich aneignet oder einführt, um sie auszusetzen; b. Jagdgebiete ohne ausreichenden Grund mit einer Schusswaffe betritt; c. ausserhalb der Jagdzeit Waffen oder Fallen auf Maiensässen und Alpen aufbewahrt; d. Hunde wildern lässt; e. Massnahmen zum Schutze der Tiere vor Störung missachtet; f. Eier oder Jungvögel jagdbarer Arten ausnimmt; g. Böschungen, Feldraine oder Weiden flächenhaft abbrennt oder Hecken beseitigt; h. den Jagdbetrieb behindert; i. die fachgerechte Nachsuche innert nützlicher Frist unterlässt, nachdem er oder sie bei der Ausübung der Jagd ein Wildtier verletzt hat oder dies nicht klar beurteilen kann.

Versuch und Gehilfenschaft sind strafbar.

Handelt der Täter in den Fällen von Absatz 1 Buchstaben a–g fahrlässig, so ist die Strafe Busse.

Wer während der Jagd die vorgeschriebenen Ausweise nicht auf sich trägt oder sich weigert, sie den zuständigen Wildschutzorganen vorzuzeigen, wird mit Busse bestraft.

Die Kantone können Widerhandlungen gegen kantonales Recht als Übertretungen ahnden.

← Art. 17 JSG Bundesgesetz vom 20. Juni 1986 über die Jagd und den Schutz wildlebender Säugetiere und Vögel (JSG) - Zweck Art. 19 JSG →

Gerichtsentscheide zu dieser Bestimmung (30)

SB230251 · zh (Art. 18 Abs. 1 lit. d JSG)

State v. Smith (Dog Attack and Hunting Violations)

Basis for conviction for the violation of the Federal Hunting Act (Dossier 3).

SU140045 · zh (Art. 18 Abs. 1 lit. d i.V.m. Abs. 3 JSG)

Appeal Regarding Negligent Dog Hunting and Supervision

Basis for finding the accused guilty of negligent allowing a dog to hunt game.

ASS 2011 68 · ju (art. 18 al. 1 LCP)

Disability Pension Over-Indemnification Due to Resumed Part-Time Employment

Cited as the cantonal provision regulating the calculation of overinsurance.

ASS 2011 68 · ju (art. 18 al. 4 LCP)

Disability Pension Over-Indemnification Due to Resumed Part-Time Employment

Cited in relation to the recalculation of overinsurance following the resumption of gainful activity.

30.2009.26 · ti (Art. 18 LCP)

Cantonal Ban on Hunting Beepers Upheld Against Federal Animal Protection Challenge

This provision relates to the penalty framework within the Hunting Law, cited as part of the legal basis for upholding the decision.

30.2009.27 · ti (art. 18, 21 LCP)

Hunter Fine Appeal Regarding Acoustic Dog Signaling Device

These articles concerning the cantonal law on hunting were cited in the preamble to the decision (listing the grounds of the previous decision and the cited law) and are implicitly confirmed by the dismissal of the appeal.

30.2009.28 · ti (art. 18, 21 LCP)

Hunting Dog Beeper Fine Appeal

These articles were cited in the final order (Order 1) as the legal basis for upholding the original decision, concerning hunting regulations.

SK1 2010 37 · gr (Art. 18 Abs. 1 lit. b JSG)

Roe Deer and Stag Poaching Appeal: License Denial Suspension Granted

Cited in the lower court's dispositive regarding the conviction for hunting law violations, which was mentioned in the context of non-contested parts.

30.2008.278 · ti (art. 18 LCP)

Hunter Regulation Violation Appeal Dismissed

Cited in the preamble to the final orders, relating to potential procedural aspects of the penalty enforcement law.

30.2008.59 · ti (art. 18 LCP)

Appellant v. Fine for Illegal Helicopter Use and Unattended Weapon

Cited in the preamble to the orders, providing the legal basis for cantonal regulation on weapon control, which underpins the upheld decision.

30.2008.4 · ti (Art. 18 e 21 LCP; 11, 41, 44, 45 e 47 LCC; 29 lett. a, 42 cpv. 1 lett. a, 49 lett. d, 67 RALCC)

Illegal Hunting and Concealment of Chamois Sentence Modification

These articles define the substantive violations and the initial penalty structure, which formed the basis for the appeal that led to the modification in order 1.

30.2008.43 · ti (art. 18 LCP)

Roe Deer Killing Penalty Correction Appeal

Cited in the preamble to the final orders, relating to procedural aspects of the appeal.

30.2008.2 · ti (art. 18 e 21 LCP)

Hunter Fined for Multiple Hunting Regulation Violations Upheld on Appeal

These articles, along with others, were cited in the final decision's preamble ('per questi motivi, visti gli art. ...') as the legal basis leading to the rejection of the appeal (Order 1).

10.2005.214 · ti (art. 18 cpv. 5 LCP in relazione con gli art. 41 e 11 LCC e con gli art. 17 e 29 RLCC)

State v. Defendant (Hunting Violations and Impeding Authority)

This provision grounds the conviction for repeated contravention of the Cantonal Hunting Law (LCC) established in orders 1 and 2 of the dispositive.

30.2005.103 · ti (Art. 18 LCP)

Hunter Fined for Illegal Chamois Kill; Hunting Suspension Overturned

Cited in the final order as part of the legal basis for the infraction.