Legislator Rechtsprechung & Gesetzgebung
916.161 PSMVOPPHOPF CH

Art. 32 Verordnung vom 12. Mai 2010 über das Inverkehrbringen von Pflanzenschutzmitteln (PSMV) - Pflanzenschutzmittel mit geringem Risiko

PSMV; 3. Kapitel: Pflanzenschutzmittel
Originalquelle öffnen Gesamter Erlass (113 Artikel) Maschinenlesbares Markdown (.md)

Art. 32 PSMV · Pflanzenschutzmittel mit geringem Risiko

Handelt es sich bei allen Wirkstoffen in einem Pflanzenschutzmittel um Wirkstoffe mit geringem Risiko nach Artikel 5 Absatz 4, so wird dieses Mittel als Pflanzenschutzmittel mit geringem Risiko bewilligt, sofern nach der Risikobewertung keine spezifischen Massnahmen zur Risikominderung erforderlich sind. Das Pflanzenschutzmittel muss ferner folgende Anforderungen erfüllen: a. Die in ihm enthaltenen Wirkstoffe, Safener und Synergisten wurden gemäss dem 2. Kapitel genehmigt. b. Es enthält keinen bedenklichen Stoff. c. Es ist hinreichend wirksam. d. Es verursacht bei den zu bekämpfenden Wirbeltieren keine unnötigen Leiden oder Schmerzen. e. Es erfüllt die Anforderungen nach Artikel 17 Absatz 1 Buchstaben b, c und f–i.

Mit dem Gesuch um Bewilligung eines Pflanzenschutzmittels mit geringem Risiko muss die Gesuchstellerin nachweisen, dass die Anforderungen nach Absatz 1 erfüllt sind; dem Gesuch müssen ein vollständiges Dossier und eine Kurzfassung davon beigefügt sein, die jeden einzelnen Punkt der Datenanforderungen für den Wirkstoff und das Pflanzenschutzmittel abdecken. Artikel 22 bleibt vorbehalten.

← Art. 31 PSMV Verordnung vom 12. Mai 2010 über das Inverkehrbringen von Pflanzenschutzmitteln (PSMV) - Zweck und Gegenstand Art. 33 PSMV →

Fragen Sie sich, wie diese Gesetzesbestimmung auf Ihren Fall anwendbar ist?

Prüfen Sie diesen Erlass zusammen mit Rechtsprechung, Kommentaren und verwandten Gesetzesbestimmungen in Legislator AI.

Fall in Legislator öffnen →

Gerichtsentscheide zu dieser Bestimmung (37)

C-8170/2010 (Art. 32 Abs. 2 PSMV)
Appeal on Parallel Importation of Plant Protection Products Dismissed
This provision outlines the cumulative requirements for admitting a foreign-approved plant protection product to the list of non-permit-requiring plant protection products.
C-528/2011 (Art. 32 Abs. 2 PSMV)
Plaintiff v. Defendant (Plant Protection Product Import)
Determines the cumulative conditions for admitting a foreign-approved plant protection product into the list of non-licensable plant protection products.
C-121/2011 (Art. 32 Abs. 2 Bst. a PSMV)
Patent Expiry and Pesticide List Inclusion Upheld
This provision requires that a plant protection product be registered in Switzerland and have similar defining characteristics, including the same active ingredient content and preparation type, as the product being considered for inclusion in the list of non-approved plant protection products.
C-121/2011 (Art. 32 Abs. 2 Bst. b PSMV)
Patent Expiry and Pesticide List Inclusion Upheld
This provision states that the plant protection product must have been approved abroad based on equivalent requirements, and the agronomic and environmental conditions for its use must be comparable to those in Switzerland.
C-121/2011 (Art. 32 Abs. 2 Bst. d PSMV)
Patent Expiry and Pesticide List Inclusion Upheld
This provision specifies that the plant protection product must not be or contain a pathogenic or genetically modified microorganism.
C-121/2011 (Art. 32 Abs. 2 Bst. e PSMV)
Patent Expiry and Pesticide List Inclusion Upheld
This provision concerns patent protection, stating that the holder of the Swiss-approved reference product must not have credibly proven that the foreign-approved product was placed on the market without the patent holder's consent.
C-8459/2010 (Art. 32 Abs. 2 Bst. a PSMV)
Company Fails to Prove Lack of Consent for Parallel Import of Patented Product
This provision is applied to verify that the plant protection product in question has equivalent active substance content and belongs to the same preparation type as a licensed product in Switzerland.
C-8459/2010 (Art. 32 Abs. 2 Bst. b PSMV)
Company Fails to Prove Lack of Consent for Parallel Import of Patented Product
This provision is applied to confirm that the plant protection product is licensed abroad based on equivalent requirements and that its agronomic and environmental conditions are comparable to those in Switzerland.
C-8459/2010 (Art. 32 Abs. 2 Bst. d PSMV)
Company Fails to Prove Lack of Consent for Parallel Import of Patented Product
This provision is applied to ensure that the plant protection product is not a pathogenic or genetically modified microorganism.
C-8459/2010 (Art. 32 Abs. 2 Bst. e PSMV)
Company Fails to Prove Lack of Consent for Parallel Import of Patented Product
This provision is applied to assess whether the plant protection product in question was brought onto the market without the patent holder's consent, a condition for listing it as a non-licensable parallel import.
C-8461/2010 (Art. 32 Abs. 2 Bst. a PSMV)
Parallel Import of Plant Protection Products Upheld
This provision sets conditions for the admission of foreign plant protection products based on their equivalence to Swiss-licensed products regarding active ingredients and preparation type. The court used this to establish the similarity between the foreign and Swiss reference products.
C-8461/2010 (Art. 32 Abs. 2 Bst. b PSMV)
Parallel Import of Plant Protection Products Upheld
This provision relates to the equivalence of foreign authorization requirements and the comparability of agronomic and environmental conditions for the use of plant protection products. The court confirmed these conditions were met.
C-8461/2010 (Art. 32 Abs. 2 Bst. d PSMV)
Parallel Import of Plant Protection Products Upheld
This provision outlines that plant protection products must not be pathogenic or genetically modified organisms, nor contain them. The court confirmed this condition was met.
C-8461/2010 (Art. 32 Abs. 2 Bst. e PSMV)
Parallel Import of Plant Protection Products Upheld
This provision concerns the conditions for admitting foreign plant protection products into the list of non-licensable products, specifically regarding patent protection and consent for marketing. The court's decision to dismiss the appeal hinges on the appellant's failure to prove that the products were marketed without the patent holder's consent, as required by this article.
C-8463/2010 (Art. 32 Abs. 2 Bst. a PSMV)
Foreign Plant Protection Products Equivalence Ruling
Used to establish that the conditions for the inclusion of a foreign plant protection product in the list of non-licensable products are met when a Swiss product with similar characteristics exists.