910.13
DZVOPD
CH
CH
Art. 66 Verordnung vom 23. Oktober 2013 über die Direktzahlungen an die Landwirtschaft (DZV) - Beitrag
DZV; 2. Titel: Beiträge; 5. Kapitel: Produktionssystembeiträge
Art. 66 DZV · Beitrag
Der Beitrag für die biologische Landwirtschaft wird pro Hektare ausgerichtet und nach folgenden Nutzungsarten abgestuft: a. Spezialkulturen; b. anders als mit Spezialkulturen bewirtschaftete offene Ackerfläche; c. übrige zu Beiträgen berechtigende Fläche.
Gerichtsentscheide zu dieser Bestimmung (10)
ARMP.2025.24 · ne (Art. 66 al. 1 OPD)
Agricultural Subsidy Reduction Upheld Despite Procedural Flaw in Surveillance
Cited in the reasoning regarding the canton's power to associate organizations for controls and issue instructions.
ARMP.2025.24 · ne (Art. 66 al. 3 OPD)
Agricultural Subsidy Reduction Upheld Despite Procedural Flaw in Surveillance
Cited in the reasoning to describe the control function of the canton or organization over data and compliance.
ARMP.2025.24 · ne (Art. 66 al. 4 OPD)
Agricultural Subsidy Reduction Upheld Despite Procedural Flaw in Surveillance
Cited in the reasoning to confirm that the law authorizes unannounced inspections, relevant to the surveillance measures taken.
ARMP.2025.24 · ne (Art. 66 al. 4 let. a OPD)
Agricultural Subsidy Reduction Upheld Despite Procedural Flaw in Surveillance
Cited in the reasoning to establish the link between control frequency and coordination rules set out in the OCCEA.
ARMP.2025.24 · ne (Art. 66 al. 4 let. b OPD)
Agricultural Subsidy Reduction Upheld Despite Procedural Flaw in Surveillance
Cited in the reasoning in conjunction with the authorization for unannounced controls.
ARMP.2025.24 · ne (Art. 66 al. 5 OPD)
Agricultural Subsidy Reduction Upheld Despite Procedural Flaw in Surveillance
Cited again in the reasoning concerning the procedural requirement to inform the operator of factual errors, which the court found the authority failed to follow but did not invalidate the results.
ARMP.2025.24 · ne (Art. 66 al. 5 OPD)
Agricultural Subsidy Reduction Upheld Despite Procedural Flaw in Surveillance
Cited again in the reasoning regarding the inapplicability of the procedure for informing the operator of shortcomings and the right to a re-inspection.
ARMP.2025.24 · ne (Art. 66 al. 5 OPD)
Agricultural Subsidy Reduction Upheld Despite Procedural Flaw in Surveillance
Cited in the reasoning while discussing the procedure for informing the operator of shortcomings and the right to a re-inspection, although the court concluded this procedure was not applicable to the specific surveillance method used.
FO.2008.0001 · vd (Art. 66 al. 4 OPD)
Agricultural Operator Repayment and Penalty Reduction for Misreported Cattle Summering
Cited in the reasoning concerning the passivity of the administrative authority in performing required controls, which mitigated the perceived gravity of the offense for sanctioning in 2006.
FO.2005.0023 · vd (art. 66 OPD)
Agricultural Operator v. State: Denial of Compensation for Untimely Categorical Listing
Although discussed in the reasoning regarding control procedures, this provision is not explicitly cited in the dispositive orders (I to IV) and is therefore excluded based on the rules.