910.1
LWGLAGR
CH
CH
Art. 108 Bundesgesetz vom 29. April 1998 über die Landwirtschaft (LwG) - Genehmigung
LwG; 5. Titel: Strukturverbesserungen; 3. Kapitel: Investitionskredite
Art. 108 LwG · Genehmigung
Übersteigt ein Kredit für sich allein oder zusammen mit dem Saldo früherer Investitionskredite und Betriebshilfedarlehen einen bestimmten Betrag (Grenzbetrag), so legt der Kanton den Entscheid dem BLW zur Genehmigung vor. Der Bundesrat legt den Grenzbetrag fest.
Über die Genehmigung eines Investitionskredits entscheidet das BLW erst, wenn das Projekt rechtskräftig ist.
Es teilt dem Kanton innerhalb von 30 Tagen mit, ob es den Entscheid genehmigt.
Werden die Investitionskredite als Baukredite nach Artikel 107 Absatz 2 gewährt, so wird der Saldo früherer Kredite nicht berücksichtigt.
Gerichtsentscheide zu dieser Bestimmung (7)
VB.2011.00687 · zh (Art. 108 LwG)
Building Permit Setback from Public Way Classification
This provision is listed under 'Rechtsnormen' and relates to the substantive assessment leading to the decision, although its specific application in the dispositive orders is inferred from the context of the other cited articles.
B-2890/2009 (Art. 108 Abs. 1 und 2 LwG)
Dairy Cooperative Investment Aid Case
Cited as the legal basis for the requirement of approval by the Federal Office of Agriculture (BLW) for investment credits exceeding a certain threshold, which was a crucial element in declaring the initial decision void.
VB.2004.00427 · zh (Art. 108 Abs. I LwG)
Land Consolidation Association Path Compensation Dispute
This provision is listed under the 'Rechtsnormen' section which usually implies relevance, but since the dispositive is not provided, and only the summary of the reasoning leading to 'Abweisung' (dismissal) is present, and this is not explicitly cited in the final orders, it must be excluded based on the strict rule.
VB.2004.00427 · zh (Art. 108 Abs. I Ziff. b LwG)
Land Consolidation Association Path Compensation Dispute
This provision is listed under the 'Rechtsnormen' section which usually implies relevance, but since the dispositive is not provided, and only the summary of the reasoning leading to 'Abweisung' (dismissal) is present, and this is not explicitly cited in the final orders, it must be excluded based on the strict rule.
VB.2004.00427 · zh (Art. 108 Abs. I LwG)
Land Consolidation Cooperative Compensation for Expropriated Pathway Parcels
This provision is listed under the 'Rechtsnormen' section, but since the dispositive is not explicitly provided, and the decision ends with 'Abweisung' (Dismissal), I can only list provisions explicitly mentioned in the context that informed the final order, assuming they pertain to the final outcome if they are listed under norms.
VB.2004.00427 · zh (Art. 108 Abs. I Ziff. b LwG)
Land Consolidation Cooperative Compensation for Expropriated Pathway Parcels
This provision is listed under the 'Rechtsnormen' section, but since the dispositive is not explicitly provided, and the decision ends with 'Abweisung' (Dismissal), I can only list provisions explicitly mentioned in the context that informed the final order, assuming they pertain to the final outcome if they are listed under norms.
VB.2011.00687 · zh (Art. 108 LwG)
Building Permit Setback Dispute Over Field Path Classification
This provision is listed among the legal norms relevant to the case, likely related to the overall context of field roads (Flurwege), although its direct application in the final order isn't explicitly detailed beyond being cited as applicable law.