910.1
LWGLAGR
CH
CH
Art. 102 Bundesgesetz vom 29. April 1998 über die Landwirtschaft (LwG) - Verbot der Zweckentfremdung und der Zerstückelung
LwG; 5. Titel: Strukturverbesserungen; 2. Kapitel: Beiträge
Art. 102 LwG · Verbot der Zweckentfremdung und der Zerstückelung
Grundstücke, Werke und Anlagen sowie landwirtschaftliche Gebäude, die mit Bundesbeiträgen verbessert worden sind, dürfen während 20 Jahren nach der Schlusszahlung des Bundesbeitrages ihrem landwirtschaftlichen Zweck nicht entfremdet werden, zudem darf Boden, welcher Gegenstand einer Güterzusammenlegung war, nicht zerstückelt werden.
Wer das Verbot der Zweckentfremdung oder der Zerstückelung verletzt, hat die vom Bund geleisteten Beiträge zurückzuerstatten und allen verursachten Schaden zu ersetzen.
Der Kanton kann Ausnahmen vom Zweckentfremdungs- und Zerstückelungsverbot bewilligen, wenn wichtige Gründe vorliegen. Er entscheidet, ob die geleisteten Beiträge ganz oder teilweise zurückzuerstatten sind oder ob auf eine Rückerstattung verzichtet wird.
Gerichtsentscheide zu dieser Bestimmung (16)
R 2023 101 · gr (art. 102 LAgr)
Property Owner v. Federal Agency on Land Exchange Compensation
The appeal was rejected because the required parcel splitting for the extension of parcel no. I._____ was not justified by important reasons to create an exception to the prohibition on splitting agricultural land.
AF.2022.0001 · vd (Art. 102 LAgr)
Federal Office of Agriculture v. Cantonal Decision on Land Subdivision
The judgment's core reasoning relies on the prohibition of parcelling land after land consolidation, found in this article, which justifies allowing the appeal and annulling the authorization.
AF.2022.0001 · vd (Art. 102 al. 1 LAgr)
Federal Office of Agriculture v. Cantonal Decision on Land Subdivision
Cited in the reasoning to establish the federal prohibition on parcelling land included in a land consolidation perimeter.
AF.2022.0001 · vd (Art. 102 al. 3 LAgr)
Federal Office of Agriculture v. Cantonal Decision on Land Subdivision
Cited in the reasoning as the federal authorization allowing cantons to grant derogations for important grounds.
A/4344/2019 · ge (art. 102 al. 1 LAgr)
Federal Office for Agriculture v. Cantonal Decision on Land Consolidation Parcel Division
Cited as the primary legal basis establishing the general prohibition on parcel subdivision for land included in a land consolidation scheme, which was the subject of the dispute.
A/4344/2019 · ge (art. 102 al. 3 LAgr)
Federal Office for Agriculture v. Cantonal Decision on Land Consolidation Parcel Division
The appeal was admitted and the cantonal decision annulled because the ground for derogation (non-agricultural use) did not meet the requirement of an 'important reason' under this provision.
B-3704/2016 (Art. 102 Abs. 3 LwG)
Tenant's Land Subdivision Exception and Interest Balancing
This provision allows for exceptions to the prohibition of fragmentation under important reasons, which is the core issue addressed in the dispositive. The court remands the case to the first instance to re-evaluate these important reasons.
FO.2012.0017 · vd (art. 102 LAgr)
Subdivision Authorization Despite Zone Boundary Conflict Based on Practical Use and Pending Zoning Correction
The appeal was admitted and the original decision was annulled to grant the land division authorization based on this article (and Art. 112 LAF).
B-3262/2014 (Art. 102 Abs. 1 LwG)
Federal Administrative Court: Subdivision Prohibition Expired After 20 Years
This provision concerning the prohibition of subdivision was interpreted by the court regarding its duration.
B-5178/2012 (Art. 102 Abs. 3 LwG)
Tenant's Pre-emption Right vs. Agricultural Land Subdivision Prohibition
Cited as the basis for the possibility of granting exceptions to the prohibition of fragmentation.
FO.2011.0025 · vd (Art. 102 LAgr)
Property Owner v. Administrative Service Regarding Land Subdivision Approval
The court admitted the appeal and ordered the administrative service to issue a new decision based on the grounds that authorize morcellement under this article.
AF.2010.0002 · vd (art. 102 LAgr)
Appeal on Reimbursement of Land Improvement Subsidies After Conversion of Agricultural Barn
Cited in the legal analysis regarding the prohibition of disaffection for subsidized federal improvements.
FO.2008.0008 · vd (art. 102 LAgr)
Heirs v. Administrative Authority Regarding Land Consolidation Subdivision
The court ordered the lower authority to issue the subdivision authorization, referencing this article concerning the prohibition of land subdivision following land consolidation.
AF.1994.0015 · vd (Art. 102 LAgr)
Chalet Subsidy Reimbursement Appeal on Agricultural Use Precedent
Although the article defines the federal obligation to repay contributions upon non-agricultural use, the decision ultimately annulled the federal subsidy repayment based on the exception found in Art. 35 al. 2 OAS, which relates to the scope of Art. 102.
AF.2004.0001 · vd (Art. 102 LAgr)
Equestrian Facility Subsidy Restitution Dispute
The court found that the properties were not subject to the prohibition of decommissioning because the change of use occurred before the aid was granted, leading to the annulment of the decision regarding federal subsidies.