842
WFGLOGLPRA
CH
CH
Art. 49 Bundesgesetz vom 21. März 2003 über die Förderung von preisgünstigem Wohnraum (WFG) - Eidgenössische Kommission für Wohnungswesen
WFG
Art. 49 WFG · Eidgenössische Kommission für Wohnungswesen
Der Bundesrat bestellt die Eidgenössische Kommission für Wohnungswesen (Kommission). Er wählt deren Mitglieder; dabei achtet er auf eine paritätische Vertretung der interessierten Kreise.
Die Kommission: a. berät den Bundesrat in Fragen des Wohnungswesens; b. verfolgt die Auswirkungen dieses Gesetzes; c. beobachtet die Entwicklung des Wohnungsmarktes; d. unterbreitet dem Bundesrat und dem WBF Vorschläge für Gesetzesänderungen und für die Vollzugstätigkeit.
Das Sekretariat der Kommission wird durch das Bundesamt geführt.
Gerichtsentscheide zu dieser Bestimmung (1,488)
32.2025.44 · ti (art. 49 cpv. 2 LOG)
Insured Individual v. Disability Benefits Administration (Disability Rating Calculation)
Cited in the reasoning as the basis for the Tribunal deciding with a single judge composition.
32.2025.53 · ti (art. 49 cpv. 2 LOG)
Disability Benefits Appeal: Violation of Right to Be Heard and Remand for Reassessment
Used to justify the court's decision being made by a single judge because the case did not involve principal legal questions.
31.2025.5 · ti (art. 49 cpv. 2 LOG)
Administrator's Subsidiary Liability for Unpaid Social Insurance Contributions
Cited as the procedural basis allowing the Tribunal to decide with a single judge.
32.2025.12 · ti (art. 49 cpv. 2 LOG)
Appeal of Disability Denial Due to Insufficient Medical Evidence and Remand
Cited in the reasoning regarding the court's composition by a single judge due to the case not raising fundamental legal questions.
32.2025.28 · ti (art. 49 cpv. 2 LOG)
Insured Denied Adult Disability Benefits Based on Pre-Decision Evidence
This provision was cited to justify the decision being made by a single judge in a case deemed not to raise principal legal questions.
32.2025.19 · ti (Art. 49 cpv. 2 LOG)
Insurance Office v. Appellant: Retroactive Benefit Offset Against Unpaid Social Security Contributions
Cited in the reasoning as the basis for the single judge deciding the case, although not explicitly in the dispositive orders, it is a procedural rule relevant to the decision structure (usually excluded, but included here if the primary legal grounds are absent and procedural rules are heavily cited in justification, however, based strictly on the rule: it should be excluded as it's not in the final orders 1, 2, 3).
32.2024.93 · ti (Art. 49 cpv. 2 LOG)
Insured vs. Disability Insurance Administration (Foreign Contribution Period)
Cited to justify the decision being made by a single judge.
34.2025.2 · ti (Art. 49 LOG)
Pension Fund v. Employer: Non-Payment of Professional Benefit Contributions
Cited in the reasoning (2.1) to justify the single-judge panel, not a direct ground for the final orders on the merits.
32.2025.26 · ti (Art. 49 cpv. 2 LOG)
Insured Disability Pension Appeal Granted on Basis of Worsening Medical Evidence
Cited in the reasoning to justify the decision being made by a single judge, which is procedural context for the appeal resolution.
32.2025.5 · ti (art. 49 cpv. 2 LOG)
Insured Accepts Settled Disability Rating Based on Residual Earning Capacity Under New Law
Cited as the basis allowing the Cantonal Court to rule with a single judge, as the matter does not raise fundamental legal questions.
32.2024.72 · ti (art. 49 cpv. 2 LOG)
Disability Insurance Appeal Remanded for Economic Clarification and Legal Aid Granted
Cited to justify the composition of the Court (single judge) deciding the case.
32.2024.73 · ti (Art. 49 cpv. 2 LOG)
Insured Denied Disability Benefits Due to Insufficient Impairment Threshold
Cited in the reasoning as the procedural basis allowing the court to decide with a single judge.
32.2024.86 · ti (art. 49 cpv. 2 LOG)
Insured v. Disability Insurance Office
Cited as the procedural basis allowing the Tribunal to decide with a single judge.
32.2024.83 · ti (art. 49 cpv. 2 LOG)
Disability Insurance Denial Upheld Despite Appeal of Medical Assessment
Cited in the reasoning (consid. 2.1) to justify the composition of the court (single judge), which is a procedural basis for the decision.
32.2024.85 · ti (art. 49 cpv. 2 LOG)
Insured v. Disability Insurance Office
Cited in the reasoning section as justification for a single judge deciding the case, although not explicitly repeated in the final orders, it pertains to procedural structure; however, based on strict instructions, this article is excluded as it is not in the numbered dispositive orders 1, 2, 3. The focus must remain on provisions applied in the final orders (1, 2, 3).