Legislator Rechtsprechung & Gesetzgebung
DE FR IT EN
In Legislator analysieren
842 WFGLOGLPRA CH

Art. 38 Bundesgesetz vom 21. März 2003 über die Förderung von preisgünstigem Wohnraum (WFG) - Kapitalbeteiligungen

WFG
Originalquelle öffnen Gesamter Erlass (61 Artikel) Maschinenlesbares Markdown (.md)

Art. 38 WFG · Kapitalbeteiligungen

Das Bundesamt kann sich in Ausnahmefällen am Kapital von Organisationen des gemeinnützigen Wohnungsbaus beteiligen.

← Art. 37 WFG Bundesgesetz vom 21. März 2003 über die Förderung von preisgünstigem Wohnraum (WFG) - Zweck Art. 39 WFG →

Fragen Sie sich, wie diese Gesetzesbestimmung auf Ihren Fall anwendbar ist?

Prüfen Sie diesen Erlass zusammen mit Rechtsprechung, Kommentaren und verwandten Gesetzesbestimmungen in Legislator AI.

Fall in Legislator öffnen →

Gerichtsentscheide zu dieser Bestimmung (7)

VR1 2025 74 · gr (Art. 43 cpv. 3 lett. b LGA i.u. all’art. 38 cpv. 3 LOG [CSC 173.000])
Appeal Dismissed for Untimely Filing of Residence Permit Revocation Challenge
Cited as the legal basis allowing the single judge to decide the case because the appeal and the request for reinstatement were manifestly inadmissible/unfounded.
SBK 2024 89 · gr (art. 38 cpv. 3 LOG [CSC 173.000])
Appeal Dismissed for Untimely Filing of Objection to Enforcement Order
Cited as the basis for deciding the manifestly inadmissible appeal by a single judge.
SR2 2025 11 · gr (art. 38 cpv. 3 LOG [CSC 173.000])
Traffic Violation Appeal Procedural Defects Upheld
Cited as the procedural basis allowing the appeal to be decided by a single judge because it was manifestly inadmissible and unfounded.
ZR2 2025 2 · gr (art. 38 cpv. 3 LOG)
Appeal Inadmissibility Due to Vague Grounds in Free Legal Aid and Official Counsel Denial
Cited as the legal basis for the President of the Chamber to rule as a single judge due to the evident inadmissibility of the appeal.
ZR2 2025 3 · gr (art. 38 cpv. 3 LOG)
Appeal Dismissed for Procedural Defects in Challenging Denial of Legal Aid
Cited as the legal basis allowing the President of the Chamber to rule as a single judge due to the clear inadmissibility of the appeal.
SR2 2024 53 · gr (art. 38 cpv. 3 LOG)
Claimant v. Prosecutor (Misappropriation Appeal)
This cantonal procedural provision was cited in conjunction with other rules for setting the court fee amount.
JAK 2010 39 · gr (art. 38 LOG)
Judicial Impartiality and Presiding Judge Substitution Based on Affinity to Court Personnel
This article governs the designation of an extraordinary substitute judge when the circle president cannot be replaced by their deputy, which was the issue raised by the initial motion.