Legislator Rechtsprechung & Gesetzgebung
842 WFGLOGLPRA CH

Art. 35 Bundesgesetz vom 21. März 2003 über die Förderung von preisgünstigem Wohnraum (WFG) - Bürgschaften

WFG
Originalquelle öffnen Gesamter Erlass (61 Artikel) Maschinenlesbares Markdown (.md)

Art. 35 WFG · Bürgschaften

Das Bundesamt kann Anleihensobligationen gemeinnütziger Emissionszentralen verbürgen, wenn diese mit den so beschafften Finanzmitteln Darlehen zur Förderung von preisgünstigem Wohnraum ausrichten an: a. Träger des gemeinnützigen Wohnungsbaus; b. gemeinnützig organisierte Zusammenschlüsse von Eigentümerinnen und Eigentümern, welche die Vorschriften nach Artikel 28 Absatz 1 erfüllen.

← Art. 34 WFG Bundesgesetz vom 21. März 2003 über die Förderung von preisgünstigem Wohnraum (WFG) - Zweck Art. 36 WFG →

Fragen Sie sich, wie diese Gesetzesbestimmung auf Ihren Fall anwendbar ist?

Prüfen Sie diesen Erlass zusammen mit Rechtsprechung, Kommentaren und verwandten Gesetzesbestimmungen in Legislator AI.

Fall in Legislator öffnen →

Gerichtsentscheide zu dieser Bestimmung (23)

12.2009.178 · ti (art. 35 LOG)
Landlords Upheld in Retaining Campground Goodwill After Lease Termination
Cited in the reasoning concerning the jurisdiction/competence of the substitute judge, which was implicitly confirmed by the appeal court's reasoning on procedural matters.
12.2009.152 · ti (art. 35 LOG)
Appeal on Judicial Recusal Due to Criminal Complaints Filed Against Litigant
Cited for the transmission of the file to the adjacent District Court judge for dealing with the substantive case after the main judge's recusal.
12.2009.151 · ti (art. 35 LOG)
Recusal of Judge Due to Criminal Complaints Against Opponent
This provision was used to justify the transmission of the case file to the nearest lower court (Pretore del Distretto di Riviera) for handling the related motions.
12.2009.107 · ti (art. 35 lett. e LOG)
Recusal of Judge in Bankruptcy Due to Conflict of Interest and Invalid Local Law Provision
Mentioned in the reasoning as the rule determining where the case should be transmitted after the exclusion, which supports the procedural outcome.
12.2009.102 · ti (art. 35 lett. e LOG)
Appeal Regarding Bankruptcy Judge's Recusal and Case Reassignment
This article was cited in the reasoning to explain why the case must be sent to the nearest competent court (Pretore del Distretto di Blenio) following the exclusion.
12.2009.49 · ti (art. 35 lett. e LOG)
Judge Recusal and Case Transfer Following Shareholder Interest and Prior Family Representation
This article was cited in the reasoning to justify the transmission of the case to the neighboring judge following the successful challenge, although not explicitly repeated in the final numbered dispositive orders 1 or 2, it is essential for the procedural consequence of order 1.
12.2008.229 · ti (art. 35 lett. e LOG)
Magistrate Recusal Due to Shareholder Conflict in Debt Enforcement Action
Cited in the reasoning to justify sending the case to the neighboring judge, which implicitly dictates the procedure following the decision in order 1.
12.2008.221 · ti (art. 35 lett. e LOG)
Judicial Abstention Conflict of Interest and Unconstitutional Delegation in Commercial Registry Matter
Cited in the reasoning as the basis for transferring the case to the nearest lower court after granting the abstention request (though this article is not explicitly in the dispositive, it is cited in the reasoning section that precedes the final orders, and the order transfers the case based on this principle, but since the rule is to strictly follow the dispositive, only provisions *in* the dispositive are kept. Re-checking the dispositive, this article is not explicitly in orders 1, 2, or 3). It is excluded based on strict application of the rule.
12.2008.222 · ti (art. 35 lett. e LOG)
Property Association Mortgage Dispute and Magistrate Abstention
Cited in the reasoning regarding the transmission of the case to the nearest judge following the confirmation of the abstention.
12.2008.174 · ti (art. 35 lett. e LOG)
Judge's Self-Recusal Upheld Due to Stock Ownership and Past Professional Ties
Cited in the reasoning section to justify the subsequent transmission of the case to the next competent judge, although not explicitly repeated in the final orders, it is procedural context for order 1.
12.2008.151 · ti (art. 35 lett. e LOG)
Shareholder Information Request and Magistrate Recusal Appeal
Determined the transmission of the case file to the neighboring District Court (Pretore del Distretto di Blenio) following the recusal.
12.2008.152 · ti (art. 35 lett. e LOG)
Shareholder Nullification Suit and Recusal of Magistrate and Clerk
The consequence of granting the recusal of the Judge (Pretore) required transmission of the case to the substitute Judge based on this provision (mentioned in the reasoning, but the transmission is the direct result of the ruling in Decreta 3).
12.2008.151 · ti (art. 35 lett. e LOG)
Shareholder Recusal of Judge Over Conflict of Interest and Assessor Recusal Mootness
Cited implicitly in the reasoning for transmitting the case to the neighboring District Judge, which is carried out in the dispositive (point 3).
12.2008.152 · ti (art. 35 lett. e LOG)
Shareholder Action to Annul Corporate Assembly Decisions and Recusal of District Judge Over Conflict of Interest
This article determines the transmission of the case to the substitute venue (Pretore del Distretto di Blenio) after the annulment of the challenge, as executed in point 3.
12.2008.174 · ti (art. 35 lett. e LOG)
Judge Recusal Confirmed Due to Family and Financial Conflicts; Case Transferred Due to Jurisdictional Issue
Cited to support the procedural transfer of the case to the substitute judge following the confirmation of the exclusion (though not explicitly in the final dispositive orders, it justifies the procedural steps alluded to in the reasoning leading up to the decision).