842
WFGLOGLPRA
CH
CH
Art. 26 Bundesgesetz vom 21. März 2003 über die Förderung von preisgünstigem Wohnraum (WFG) - Rückbürgschaften
WFG
Art. 26 WFG · Rückbürgschaften
Das Bundesamt kann Rückbürgschaften eingehen für Bürgschaften von Hypothekar-Bürgschaftseinrichtungen, wenn damit die Finanzierung preisgünstigen Wohneigentums sichergestellt wird.
Verbürgt die Hypothekar-Bürgschaftseinrichtung zusätzlich Vorschüsse, so erstreckt sich die Rückbürgschaft auch auf diese.
Der Bundesrat regelt die angemessene Verteilung der Risiken zwischen den Hypothekar-Bürgschaftseinrichtungen und dem Bund.
Gerichtsentscheide zu dieser Bestimmung (114)
90.1998.69 · ti (art. 26 quater lett. D LOG)
Federal Administration of Finance v. State Council Resolution on Spatial Planning Revision
Cited as the basis for the jurisdiction of the Territorial Planning Tribunal.
43.2008.3 · ti (Art. 26 c cpv. 2 LOG)
Victim Compensation Delay Appeal Denied
Cited as the legal basis for the delegation of jurisdiction to a single judge.
32.2005.151 · ti (Art. 26 c cpv. 2 LOG)
Accountant v. Disability Insurer Regarding Work Incapacity Assessment
Cited as a procedural basis allowing the Cantonal Court to decide with a single Judge.
32.2005.117 · ti (Art. 26 c cpv. 2 LOG)
Claimant v. Social Security Administration (Disability Benefits Denial)
Cited in reasoning to justify the decision being made by a single judge (Giudice unico).
32.2005.123 · ti (Art. 26 c cpv. 2 LOG)
Fibromyalgia Disability Denial Upheld Based on Multidisciplinary Administrative Assessment Over Treating Physician Opinion
Cited in the reasoning section to justify the Tribunal's composition as a single judge, which is relevant to the procedural handling of the case, although the core decision is in order 1.
32.2005.164 · ti (art. 26 cpv. 2 LOG)
Appeal Regarding Disability Pension Calculation and Subsequent Medical Deterioration
Cited in the reasoning to justify the court's composition, although the main ground for judgment is the rejection of the appeals.
36.2006.59 · ti (art. 26 cpv. 2 LOG)
Insurer's Opposition Rejection Jurisdiction in Social Insurance Enforcement
Cited to justify the decision being made by a single judge because the case did not raise issues of legal principle or significant importance.
90.1994.103 · ti (Art. 26 c lett. D LOG)
Property Owner v. Zoning Board (Silo Infrastructure)
Cited to establish the Tribunal's jurisdiction over the matter.
90.2000.77 · ti (art. 26 quater lett. D LOG)
Property Owner v. Municipality Regarding Tree-Lined Avenues in Development Plan
Cited as the basis for the Territorial Planning Tribunal's jurisdiction.
90.2000.78 · ti (art. 26 quater lett. D LOG)
Property Owner v. Municipality Regarding Territorial Plan Revision and Tree Planting Along Cantonal Road
Cited to establish the Tribunal's jurisdiction.
90.2000.79 · ti (art. 26 quater lett. D LOG)
Property Owner v. Canton Regarding Land Use Plan Revision and Tree-Lined Avenue
Cited as the basis for the jurisdiction of the Territory Planning Tribunal (TPT).
90.2000.73 · ti (Art. 26 quater lett. D LOG)
Property Owners v. State Council (Premature Appeal of Land Use Plan Revision)
Cited in the reasoning to establish the court's competence, but not explicitly used in the dispositive orders.
90.2000.82 · ti (art. 26 quater lett. D LOG)
Property Owner Appeal Against Land Use Rezoning and Avenue Restriction Upheld
Cited in the reasoning to establish the competence of the TPT.
90.1998.52 · ti (Art. 26 quater lett. D LOG)
Property Owner v. Zoning Board Regarding Mandatory Neighborhood Development Plan
Cited as the basis for the jurisdiction/competence of the Territorial Planning Tribunal.
90.2000.67 · ti (Art. 26 quater lett. D LOG)
Property Owners v. State Council (Land-Use Plan Revision for Kindergarten Expansion)
Cited to establish the court's jurisdiction regarding the appeal.