837.0
AVIGLACILADI
CH
CH
Art. 9b Bundesgesetz vom 25. Juni 1982 über die obligatorische Arbeitslosenversicherung und die Insolvenzentschädigung (AVIG) - Rahmenfristen im Falle von Erziehungszeiten
AVIG; Dritter Titel: Leistungen; Zweites Kapitel: Arbeitslosenentschädigung
Art. 9b AVIG · Rahmenfristen im Falle von Erziehungszeiten
Die Rahmenfrist für den Leistungsbezug von Versicherten, die sich der Erziehung ihrer Kinder gewidmet haben, wird um zwei Jahre verlängert, sofern: a. zu Beginn der einem Kind unter zehn Jahren gewidmeten Erziehung eine Rahmenfrist für den Leistungsbezug läuft; und b. im Zeitpunkt der Wiederanmeldung die Anspruchsvoraussetzung der genügenden Beitragszeit nicht erfüllt ist.
Die Rahmenfrist für die Beitragszeit von Versicherten, die sich der Erziehung ihrer Kinder gewidmet haben, beträgt vier Jahre, sofern zu Beginn der einem Kind unter zehn Jahren gewidmeten Erziehung keine Rahmenfrist für den Leistungsbezug lief.
Durch jede weitere Niederkunft wird die Rahmenfrist nach Absatz 2 um jeweils höchstens zwei Jahre verlängert.
Die Absätze 1–3 sind für die gleiche Erziehungszeit nur auf einen Elternteil und nur für ein Kind anwendbar.
Die Taggelder dürfen insgesamt die Höchstzahl nach Artikel 27 nicht übersteigen.
Der Bundesrat bestimmt die Voraussetzungen, unter denen die Verlängerung der Rahmenfristen nach den Absätzen 1 und 2 auch im Falle der Unterbringung von Kindern zur Adoption anwendbar ist.
Gerichtsentscheide zu dieser Bestimmung (38)
AVI.2011.36 · sg (Art. 9b Abs. 2 AVIG)
Claimant's Appeal for Extended Unemployment Benefits Denied Due to Insufficient Evidence of Self-Employment and Reliance on Unproven Advice
The article defining the extension of the contribution period for child-rearing forms the legal background, although the court ultimately based its decision on lack of proof regarding the subsequent self-employment extension.
CDP.2025.30 · ne (Art. 9b al. 2 LACI)
Insured Individual v. Unemployment Insurance Agency
Basis for extending the contribution period framework due to educational leave, leading to the admission of the appeal.
AL.2023.00197 · zh (Art. 9b Abs. 1 AVIG)
Claimant Denied Unemployment Benefit Extension Despite Child Care Duties
This provision concerns the extension of the benefit period framework due to child-rearing, which was the central substantive issue of the appeal, although the court ultimately found the requirements were not met.
AL.2023.00197 · zh (Art. 9b Abs. 1 lit. a AVIG)
Claimant Denied Unemployment Benefit Extension Despite Child Care Duties
This specific subsection regarding dedicating oneself to child-rearing during an ongoing benefit period framework was analyzed as a cumulative requirement.
AL.2023.00197 · zh (Art. 9b Abs. 1 lit. b AVIG)
Claimant Denied Unemployment Benefit Extension Despite Child Care Duties
This specific subsection regarding the insufficient fulfillment of the contribution period was repeatedly analyzed in relation to the requirement for reopening the benefit period.
ACH.225.21.98.2022 · vd (Art. 9b LACI)
Unemployment Benefits Claim Denied Due to Insufficient Proof of Childcare Withdrawal
This provision concerns the special regulation for contribution periods in case of educational leave, which was the core subject of the appeal.
A/144/2021 · ge (Art. 9b LACI)
Unemployment Insurance Extension Denial Based on Childcare and Contribution Continuity
The court implicitly rejected the claim for extension of the benefit period based on a period of education, which is governed by this article, by rejecting the appeal on the merits (Order 2).
VSBES.2020.205 · so (Art. 9b Abs. 2 AVIG)
Unemployment Benefits Denial Upheld Despite Probable Circumstances of Caregiving Abroad
This provision was not ultimately applied to grant the extension of the contribution period, as the court found no causal link between the child-rearing/absence and the failure to meet the contribution period requirement.
38.2020.41 · ti (art. 9b LADI)
Appeal Rejected for Unproven Wage Receipt in Family Employment Case
This article concerning the prolonged reference period was applied in the reasoning to establish the relevant timeframe, but not explicitly cited in the final orders.
605 2018 85 · fr (art. 9b al. 2 LACI)
Unemployment Benefits Denial for Insufficient Contribution Period Despite Family Trip Claim
Cited in the reasoning section when analyzing the inapplicability of claiming exemptions under Art. 14 during a period extended under Art. 9b al. 2.
605 2018 85 · fr (art. 9b al. 2 LACI)
Unemployment Benefits Denial for Insufficient Contribution Period Despite Family Trip Claim
The article concerning the prolonged contribution period for child-rearing was extensively discussed as the main ground for the appeal, even though its application was ultimately rejected.
CDP.2017.312 · ne (Art. 9b al. 2 LACI)
Unemployment Benefits Denial for Pre-Birth Study Enrollment
This provision concerns the possibility of extending the contribution period framework to four years for someone dedicated to child-rearing, which was the core substantive issue of the appeal.
AL.2017.00278 · zh (Art. 9b Abs. 2 AVIG)
Claimant v. Unemployment Fund: Denial of Benefits and Contribution Period Calculation
The case was remanded to the Insurance Fund to examine the claimant's entitlement to an extension of the contribution period to four years based on this provision.
38.2017.3 · ti (Art. 9b LADI)
Unemployment Benefits Appeal Denied Due to Insufficient Contribution Proof
This provision was cited for calculating the relevant time frame (quadro term) during which contribution periods are assessed.
AL.2014.00043 · zh (Art. 9b Abs. 2 AVIG)
Unemployment Benefits Denial Upheld: Foreign Contributions and Childcare Claims Rejected
Cited to address the extension of the framework period due to child-rearing, and the causal link required for such an extension.