Legislator Rechtsprechung & Gesetzgebung
837.0 AVIGLACILADI CH

Art. 20 Bundesgesetz vom 25. Juni 1982 über die obligatorische Arbeitslosenversicherung und die Insolvenzentschädigung (AVIG) - Geltendmachung des Anspruchs

AVIG; Dritter Titel: Leistungen; Zweites Kapitel: Arbeitslosenentschädigung
Originalquelle öffnen Gesamter Erlass (174 Artikel) Maschinenlesbares Markdown (.md)

Art. 20 AVIG · Geltendmachung des Anspruchs

Der Arbeitslose macht seinen Entschädigungsanspruch bei einer Kasse geltend, die er frei wählen kann. Innerhalb der Rahmenfrist für den Leistungsbezug (Art. 9 Abs. 2) ist ein Kassenwechsel nicht zulässig. Der Bundesrat bestimmt die Ausnahmen.

Der Arbeitslose muss der Kasse eine Arbeitsbescheinigung seines bisherigen Arbeitgebers vorlegen. Dieser stellt sie ihm beim Ausscheiden aus seinen Diensten aus. Wird der Versicherte erst später arbeitslos, so hat ihm der Arbeitgeber die Bescheinigung auf Aufforderung innert einer Woche zuzustellen.

Der Anspruch erlischt, wenn er nicht innert dreier Monate nach dem Ende der Kontrollperiode, auf die er sich bezieht, geltend gemacht wird. Unzustellbare Entschädigungen verfallen drei Jahre nach dem Ende der Kontrollperiode.

...

← Art. 19 AVIG Bundesgesetz vom 25. Juni 1982 über die obligatorische Arbeitslosenversicherung und die Insolvenzentschädigung (AVIG) Art. 21 AVIG →

Fragen Sie sich, wie diese Gesetzesbestimmung auf Ihren Fall anwendbar ist?

Prüfen Sie diesen Erlass zusammen mit Rechtsprechung, Kommentaren und verwandten Gesetzesbestimmungen in Legislator AI.

Fall in Legislator öffnen →

Gerichtsentscheide zu dieser Bestimmung (254)

VVGE.2003.04.Nr.43 · ow (Art. 20 Abs. 3 AVIG)
Trust in advice overrides timely claim requirement for unemployment benefits.
The court determined that the unemployment office wrongly relied on this provision, as the principle of trust superseded it in this case.
AVI.2006.67 · sg (Art. 20 Abs. 3 Satz 1 AVIG)
Insured Person v. Unemployment Office: Failure to Advise on Reporting Obligations
This article, establishing the three-month forfeiture period, was central to the issue of re-establishment of the period due to excusable reasons related to the lack of instruction.
AL.2024.00195 · zh (Art. 20 Abs. 3 AVIG)
Insured Person v. Denial of Unemployment Benefits
Cited in reasoning regarding the lack of a timely application for unemployment benefits for October 2023, although the main ruling is based on confirming the lower decision.
VBE.2024.550 · ag (Art. 20 Abs. 3 AVIG)
Unemployment Benefits Expired Due to Claimant's Failure to Submit Forms
This provision establishes the time limit for claiming unemployment benefits, stating that the claim expires if not made within three months after the end of the control period. It was used to determine that the claimant's right to benefits had expired due to non-submission of required forms.
AL.2024.00088 · zh (Art. 20 Abs. 3 AVIG)
Unemployment Benefits Denial for Late Submission of Insured Person's Details
The court used this provision to deny the claim because it was not submitted within the three-month forfeiture period.
A/181/2024 · ge (Art. 20 al. 3 LACI)
Unemployment Benefit Denial Due to Untimely Separation and Procedural Non-Compliance
Mentioned in the reasoning as a basis for the applicant potentially forfeiting benefits due to not submitting IPA forms, although this was stated as an additional finding ('a fortiori').
S 2023 83 · zg (Art. 20 Abs. 3 AVIG)
Unemployment Insurance Fund v. Claimant (Failure to Notify Regarding Missing Form)
The main ground for the decision is that the claim for unemployment benefits for January 2023 has not lapsed (verwirkt) due to the late submission of the AvP form, contrary to the administrative decision.
A/1885/2024 · ge (art. 20 al. 3 LACI)
Unemployment Benefits Appeal Regarding Forfeiture Period and Duty of Counsel
This provision establishes the deadline for exercising the right to unemployment benefit, which was central to the decision regarding the refusal of benefits for May and June 2023.
S1 24 13 · vs (art. 20 al. 3 LACI)
Claimant's Appeal for Retroactive Supplementary Family Allowances Denied as Time-Barred
The appeal was rejected because the right to the family allowance supplement was not exercised within the three-month deadline.
AL.2024.00022 · zh (Art. 20 Abs. 3 AVIG)
Unemployment Benefits Awarded Despite Late Submission Due to Fund's Failure to Warn of Forfeiture
This provision establishes a three-month forfeiture period for claiming unemployment benefits, but its application depends on the unemployment fund providing explicit warnings about the consequences of late submission, which was not done here.
A/3430/2023 · ge (Art. 20 al. 3 LACI)
Claimant Denied Retroactive Child Allowance for Untimely Filing
The appeal was rejected because the claim for the family allowance supplement was filed after the three-month statutory expiry period.
A/4088/2023 · ge (art. 20 al. 3 LACI)
Insured Denied Benefits for Untimely Submission of Mandatory IPA Forms
The appeal was rejected because the right to unemployment benefit for the concerned periods had lapsed due to failure to submit the IPA forms within the three-month deadline.
715.24.33.104 · bl (Art. 20 Abs. 3 AVIG)
Unemployment Benefits Claim Denied Due to Incomplete Documentation
This provision is cited as the legal basis for the expiration of the claim for unemployment benefits if not asserted within three months after the end of the control period, which is the core reason for the rejection of the appeal.
S1 23 147 · vs (art. 20 al. 3 LACI)
Unemployment Claimant Denied Benefits for Failure to Timely Provide Documentation
The appeal was rejected because the right to unemployment benefit expired due to the failure to provide the necessary information within the three-month deadline.
AL.2023.00123 · zh (Art. 20 Abs. 3 AVIG)
Unemployment Benefits Forfeited Due to Failure to Report
Cited in the reasoning regarding the expiry of the claim for unemployment benefits if not made within three months.