837.0
AVIGLACILADI
CH
Art. 110 Bundesgesetz vom 25. Juni 1982 über die obligatorische Arbeitslosenversicherung und die Insolvenzentschädigung (AVIG) - Aufsicht
AVIG; Neunter Titel: Schlussbestimmungen; Erstes Kapitel: Vollzugsbestimmungen
Art. 110 AVIG · Aufsicht
Die Aufsichtsbehörden (Art. 76 ATSG ) sorgen insbesondere für die einheitliche Rechtsanwendung. Sie können den Durchführungsorganen Weisungen erteilen.
Gerichtsentscheide zu dieser Bestimmung (79)
A/235/2024 · ge (art. 110 LACI)
Unemployment Benefits Denial Based on Administrator Status
Cited to establish the SECO's authority to issue instructions ensuring uniform application of the law.
A/2284/2022 · ge (Art. 110 LACI)
Unemployment Benefits Denial Upheld Due to Active Commercial Register Status
This provision is cited in the reasoning concerning the role of SECO as the supervisory authority, providing legal context but not directly used in the final orders.
A/2665/2020 · ge (art. 110 LACI)
Unemployment Insurance Claimant Fitness Reinstated Despite COVID-19 Related Missed Appointments
Cited in consideration 4.a to establish the authority of the SECO to issue instructions affecting the application of LACI provisions.
A/3766/2020 · ge (Art. 110 LACI)
Unemployment Benefits Denial Upheld Due to Insufficient Contribution Period Pending Labor Dispute Resolution
Cited in relation to the SECO directives on confirming contribution activities.
A/2690/2019 · ge (Art. 110 LACI)
Appeal Regarding Denial of Unemployment Benefits Based on Disputed Residency
Cited regarding the SECO's role as supervisory authority.
A/2625/2019 · ge (art. 110 LACI)
Unemployment Benefits Suspension for Failure to Apply for Assigned Job
Cited in the background reasoning regarding the authority of SECO to issue instructions.
A/1449/2019 · ge (art. 110 LACI)
Unemployment Benefits Suspension for Failure to Apply for Suitable Work
Reference to the role of the SECO as the supervisory authority.
38.2019.4 · ti (art. 110 LADI)
Insolvency Compensation Denial Upheld Due to Failure to Mitigate Damages
Cited to define the role of the State Secretariat for Economic Affairs (SECO) as the supervisory authority.
38.2019.5 · ti (art. 110 LADI)
Insolvency Claim Denial Due to Failure to Diligently Mitigate Damages
Cited in the reasoning regarding the supervisory role of SECO, which is relevant background for applying Art. 55 LADI, though not explicitly used in the dispositive orders themselves.
38.2018.73 · ti (Art. 110 LADI)
Appeal Regarding Denial of Insolvency Benefits and Vacation Pay Calculation
Cited in the reasoning section concerning the authority of SECO to issue general instructions, providing context for the administrative practice cited (Not in final order).
38.2018.70 · ti (art. 110 LADI)
Insolvency Insurance Denial for Failure to Mitigate Damages (Unpaid Wages)
Cited in the reasoning section regarding the supervisory role of SECO, but not explicitly in the final orders (dispositive). Excluded based on rules.
38.2018.64 · ti (Art. 110 LADI)
Former Employee Denied Insolvency Benefits for Failure to Timely Pursue Unpaid Wages
Cited in the reasoning regarding the supervisory role of the SECO, but not explicitly used in the dispositive orders.
38.2018.28 · ti (art. 110 LADI)
Insolvency Compensation Denial Upheld Due to Insured's Insufficient Diligence in Salary Recovery
Cited in the reasoning to justify the role of SECO as supervisory authority, though not directly used in the final orders, it is mentioned to support the discussion on LADI.
38.2018.24 · ti (Art. 110 LADI)
Insolvency Benefits Denial Due to Failure to Mitigate Damages by Timely Salary Pursuit
Cited in the reasoning to establish the supervisory role of SECO, although the core application remains Art. 55 LADI.
38.2018.6 · ti (art. 110 LADI)
Insured Denied Insolvency Benefits Due to Failure to Mitigate Damages
This provision related to the SECO's supervisory role, but it was cited only in the reasoning section, not in the operative orders.