836.2 FAMZGLAFAM

CH

Art. 7 Bundesgesetz vom 24. März 2006 über die Familienzulagen und Finanzhilfen an Familienorganisationen (FamZG) - Anspruchskonkurrenz

FamZG; 2. Kapitel: Allgemeine Bestimmungen

Originalquelle öffnen Gesamter Erlass (41 Artikel) Maschinenlesbares Markdown (.md)

Art. 7 FamZG · Anspruchskonkurrenz

Haben mehrere Personen für das gleiche Kind Anspruch auf Familienzulagen nach eidgenössischem oder kantonalem Recht, so steht der Anspruch in nachstehender Reihenfolge zu: a. der erwerbstätigen Person; b. der Person, welche die elterliche Sorge hat oder bis zur Mündigkeit des Kindes hatte; c. der Person, bei der das Kind überwiegend lebt oder bis zu seiner Mündigkeit lebte; d. der Person, auf welche die Familienzulagenordnung im Wohnsitzkanton des Kindes anwendbar ist; e. der Person mit dem höheren AHV-pflichtigen Einkommen aus unselbstständiger Erwerbstätigkeit; f. der Person mit dem höheren AHV-pflichtigen Einkommen aus selbstständiger Erwerbstätigkeit.

Richten sich die Familienzulagenansprüche der erst- und der zweitanspruchsberechtigten Person nach den Familienzulagenordnungen von zwei verschiedenen Kantonen, so hat die zweitanspruchsberechtigte Person Anspruch auf den Betrag, um den der gesetzliche Mindestansatz in ihrem Kanton höher ist als im anderen.

← Art. 6 FamZG Bundesgesetz vom 24. März 2006 über die Familienzulagen und Finanzhilfen an Familienorganisationen (FamZG) Art. 8 FamZG →

Gerichtsentscheide zu dieser Bestimmung (121)

VBE.2025.1 · ag (Art. 7 Abs. 1 FamZG)

Unemployment Benefits: Wife's Higher Income Dictates Child Allowance Entitlement

This provision determines the priority for entitlement to family allowances when multiple persons are eligible for the same child, which was crucial for establishing who had the primary claim during the disputed period.

KA.2024.00003 · zh (Art. 7 Abs. 1 FamZG)

Family Allowance Priority: Father's Higher Dependent Employment Income Prevails

This provision outlines the order of priority for claiming family allowances when multiple individuals are eligible.

KA.2024.00003 · zh (Art. 7 Abs. 1 lit. e FamZG)

Family Allowance Priority: Father's Higher Dependent Employment Income Prevails

This provision determined that the husband had the primary claim to family allowances due to his higher income from dependent employment.

VBE.2024.344 · ag (Art. 7 Abs. 1 FamZG)

Mother Denied Family Allowances Due to Imputed Income Exceeding Limit

This provision sets the order of entitlement to family allowances when multiple individuals are eligible, determining that the working parent has priority.

OG.2022.00064 · gl (Art. 7 Abs. 1 lit. b FamZG)

Unjustified Dismissal of Construction Manager Due to Lax Company Practices

Determines when family allowances are paid and to whom.

39.2023.17 · ti (Art. 7 cpv. 1 LAFam)

Insurance Fund Decision on Educational Allowance Payment Upheld

This provision was cited as the basis for recognizing the appellant as the beneficiary of the family allowance for her daughter.

HC.2023.790 · vd (art. 7 LAFam)

Father v. Mother: Appeal on Child Custody and Financial Support Obligations

Cited in the initial section as context, and its provisions concerning the priority for family allowances are discussed in the reasoning (17.1.2, 17.2) but not explicitly cited in the final binding orders (I to XII).

KA.2023.00008 · zh (Art. 7 Abs. 1 lit. d FamZG)

Appeal Regarding Child Benefit Entitlement Coordination Between Cantons

The court's decision to remand the case is based on examining the priority right to benefits according to this provision, noting that the mother may not have a continuous entitlement.

39.2023.8 · ti (art. 7 cpv. 1 lett. c LAFam)

Family Allowance Recipient Revocation and Restitution Order Competence

Cited in the reasoning leading to the annulment of the decision, as the original decision hinged on the application of this article determining the primary right holder.

39.2023.2 · ti (art. 7 cpv. 1 LAFam)

Family Allowance Repayment Following Change in Primary Caregiver Status

The court implicitly confirmed the allocation of family allowance rights based on the priority ranking established in this article, which justified the revocation of benefits.

C/17135/2019 · ge (art. 7 al. 1 let. c de la loi fédérale sur les allocations familiales (LAFam))

Couple Appeals Custody and Visitation Rulings Following Protective Measures Order

Basis for attributing family allowances to the mother (the party who retained custody).

39.2022.9 · ti (Art. 7 cpv. 1 lett. c LAFam)

Family Allowances Repayment Upon Change in Child's Primary Residence

This provision determines which parent is entitled to family allowances based on the child's predominant residence, which was the main substantive issue in dismissing the appeal.

S 2022 122 · gr (Art. 7 Abs. 1 lit. c FamZG)

Family Allowance Dispute: Primary Custody vs. Divorce Agreement

The appeal was granted and the applicant's right to family allowances was established based on the child predominantly living with her.

S 2022 122 · gr (Art. 7 Abs. 1 lit. c FamZG)

Appeal on Family Allowances Based on Predominant Residency

This provision was the main ground for granting the appeal, as the court determined the child predominantly lived with the appellant (Beschwerdeführerin).

KA.2022.00009 · zh (Art. 7 Abs. 1 FamZG)

Therapist's Triplets: Overpayment, No Repayment, Case Remanded

Establishes the order of priority for entitlement to family benefits when multiple persons are eligible for the same child.