Legislator Rechtsprechung & Gesetzgebung
836.2 FAMZGLAFAM CH

Art. 19 Bundesgesetz vom 24. März 2006 über die Familienzulagen und Finanzhilfen an Familienorganisationen (FamZG) - Anspruch auf Familienzulagen

FamZG; 3. Kapitel: Familienzulagenordnungen
Originalquelle öffnen Gesamter Erlass (41 Artikel) Maschinenlesbares Markdown (.md)

Art. 19 FamZG · Anspruch auf Familienzulagen

In der AHV obligatorisch versicherte Personen, die bei der AHV als nichterwerbstätige Personen erfasst sind, gelten als Nichterwerbstätige. Sie haben Anspruch auf Familienzulagen nach den Artikeln 3 und 5. Artikel 7 Absatz 2 ist nicht anwendbar. Zuständig ist der Wohnsitzkanton.

Die Personen, die als Arbeitnehmerinnen oder Arbeitnehmer oder als Selbstständigerwerbende in der AHV obligatorisch versichert sind und das Mindesteinkommen nach Artikel 13 Absatz 3 nicht erreichen, gelten ebenfalls als Nichterwerbstätige.

Arbeitslose Mütter, die Anspruch auf eine Mutterschaftsentschädigung nach dem Erwerbsersatzgesetz vom 25. September 1952 haben, gelten während der Dauer dieses Anspruchs ebenfalls als Nichterwerbstätige. Absatz 2 ist nicht anwendbar.

Der Anspruch auf Familienzulagen ist an die Voraussetzung geknüpft, dass das steuerbare Einkommen den anderthalbfachen Betrag einer maximalen vollen Altersrente der AHV nicht übersteigt und keine Ergänzungsleistungen zur AHV/IV bezogen werden.

← Art. 18 FamZG Bundesgesetz vom 24. März 2006 über die Familienzulagen und Finanzhilfen an Familienorganisationen (FamZG) Art. 20 FamZG →

Fragen Sie sich, wie diese Gesetzesbestimmung auf Ihren Fall anwendbar ist?

Prüfen Sie diesen Erlass zusammen mit Rechtsprechung, Kommentaren und verwandten Gesetzesbestimmungen in Legislator AI.

Fall in Legislator öffnen →

Gerichtsentscheide zu dieser Bestimmung (53)

39.2025.8 · ti (Art. 19 LAFam)
Appeal Regarding Undue Repayment of Family Allowances Due to Disability Benefits
Cited to explain entitlement to family allowances for non-gainfully employed persons, but the specific subsection 2 was used in the reasoning for the verdict.
39.2025.8 · ti (Art. 19 cpv. 2 LAFam)
Appeal Regarding Undue Repayment of Family Allowances Due to Disability Benefits
Cited as the substantive rule establishing the condition (no collection of complementary benefits) for entitlement to family allowances for the non-gainfully employed, leading to the partial success of the appeal.
VBE.2024.344 · ag (Art. 19 Abs. 1 und 2 FamZG)
Mother Denied Family Allowances Due to Imputed Income Exceeding Limit
These provisions establish the eligibility criteria for non-working individuals to receive family allowances based on their taxable income, which was the core issue in the appeal.
760.24.24.163 · bl (Art. 19 Abs. 2 FamZG)
Woman Denied Child Benefits Due to Insufficient Income and Exceeding Limits
This provision sets the maximum income threshold for non-employed individuals to be eligible for family allowances, which the appellant exceeded.
KA.2023.00013 · zh (Art. 19 Abs. 2 FamZG)
Claimant v. State (Repayment of Child Benefits and Unlawful Delay in Benefit Decision)
Although cited extensively in the reasoning for why benefits were initially denied (exclusion due to receipt of supplementary benefits), this substantive article was not explicitly cited in the final orders (dispositive) to justify the annulment or dismissal of the appeal itself, but rather served as the legal basis for the administrative decision being reviewed. Since the court annulled the decision based on procedural grounds (Art. 53 ATSG procedural grounds), this is excluded based on the rules.
605 2022 143 · fr (art. 19 al. 2 LAFam)
Restitution of Family Allowances Based on Taxable Income Limits
The partial admission of the appeal modifies the restitution order based on the applicant's eligibility for family allowances as a non-gainfully employed person.
605 2023 125 · fr (art. 19 al. 2 LAFam)
Family Allowance Denial Upheld Due to Receipt of Child's Pension and Supplementary Benefits
Cited as the legal basis for excluding the right to family allowances because the child receives an AVS child supplement and supplementary benefits.
39.2022.8 · ti (art. 19 cpv. 2 LAFam)
Partial Upholding of Appeal Regarding Educational Allowances and Disability Pension Exclusion
The court's decision relies on the interpretation of this article regarding the exclusion from family allowances for recipients of supplementary benefits (PC), as discussed in the reasoning.
AF.1.22.2.2022 · vd (Art. 19 al. 1 LAFam)
Family Allowances Appeal: Domicile Requirement for Non-Gainfully Employed Persons
This article defines who is considered without gainful employment and eligible for family allowances, forming the core basis for the appeal's rejection.
63/2020/5 · sh (Art. 19 Abs. 2 FamZG)
Married Couple Family Allowance Income Assessment
This provision establishes the income limit requirement for non-employed persons to claim family allowances, which was the subject of the dispute regarding income calculation.
605 2019 231 · fr (art. 19 al. 1 LAFam)
Family Allowances for Incapacitated Parent: Self-Employed vs. Non-Employed Status
Cited in the reasoning to define who is considered a person without gainful employment for AVS purposes.
605 2019 231 · fr (art. 19 al. 1bis LAFam)
Family Allowances for Incapacitated Parent: Self-Employed vs. Non-Employed Status
Cited in the reasoning to establish that the claimant must be considered as a person without gainful employment due to insufficient income as a self-employed person.
605 2019 231 · fr (art. 19 al. 2 LAFam)
Family Allowances for Incapacitated Parent: Self-Employed vs. Non-Employed Status
Cited in the reasoning as the legal basis for granting family allowances to persons without gainful employment, subject to the income threshold.
II 2020 49 · sz (Art. 19 Abs. 1 FamZG)
Claimant vs. Father: Family Allowance Difference Payments and Non-Gainfully Employed Status
The court confirmed the previous decision to deny the difference allowance based on the status of the claimant as a non-gainfully employed person, as stipulated by this article.
2018.07.04.sv.2 · bl (Art. 19 Abs. 1 FamZG)
Educational Allowances and Retroactive Status Change Due to Marriage
The court determined that the applicant qualified as a non-working person under this provision for the period in question.