836.2
FAMZGLAFAM
CH
CH
Art. 16 Bundesgesetz vom 24. März 2006 über die Familienzulagen und Finanzhilfen an Familienorganisationen (FamZG) - Finanzierung
FamZG; 3. Kapitel: Familienzulagenordnungen
Art. 16 FamZG · Finanzierung
Die Kantone regeln die Finanzierung der Familienzulagen und der Verwaltungskosten.
Die Beiträge werden in Prozent des AHV-pflichtigen Einkommens berechnet.
Die Kantone bestimmen, ob innerhalb einer Familienausgleichskasse auf den AHV-pflichtigen Einkommen der Arbeitnehmerinnen und Arbeitnehmer und auf denjenigen der Selbstständigerwerbenden der gleiche Beitragssatz erhoben werden muss.
Die Beiträge der Selbstständigerwerbenden werden nur auf dem Teil des Einkommens erhoben, der dem in der obligatorischen Unfallversicherung höchstens versicherten Verdienst entspricht.
Gerichtsentscheide zu dieser Bestimmung (5)
AF.4.17.2.2019 · vd (art. 16 al. 4 LAFAm)
Insured Person v. Family Allowance Fund on Contribution Calculation for Dual Employment Income
This provision was implicitly used as the basis for the dispute concerning the calculation of family allowance contributions for the appellant as a self-employed person for the years 2013 and 2014, and its interpretation was central to the final decision.
AVS.16.17.39.2018 · vd (art. 16 al. 1 LAFam)
Medical Center v. Cantonal Compensation Fund: Social Insurance Contributions and Employment Status
The court implicitly confirmed the cantonal regulation of family allowance financing, as the appeal against these contributions was rejected.
WBE.2014.213 · ag (§ 16 EG FamZG)
Federal Administrative Court ruling on family equalization fund contribution rates.
The court examines whether this provision provides a sufficient legal basis to prescribe a uniform contribution rate for family equalization funds, ultimately concluding it does not.
AGVE.2015.42 · ag (§ 16 EG FamZG)
Family Equalization Funds: Appeal Admissibility and Differentiated Contribution Rates
The court determined that this provision does not provide a sufficient legal basis to prohibit family equalization funds from having different contribution rates, which is the central point of the ruling.
TA.2002.188 · ne (art. 16 LAFAM)
Asylum Seeker's Claim for Retroactive Family Allowance Barred by Cantonal Limitation Period
This provision sets the two-year prescription period for family allowance claims, which was the core legal basis for rejecting the retroactive claims in order 1.