Legislator Rechtsprechung & Gesetzgebung
832.20 UVGLAALAINF CH

Art. 77 Bundesgesetz vom 20. März 1981 über die Unfallversicherung (UVG) - Leistungspflicht der Versicherer

UVG; Fünfter Titel: Organisation; 1. Kapitel: Versicherer
Originalquelle öffnen Gesamter Erlass (137 Artikel) Maschinenlesbares Markdown (.md)

Art. 77 UVG · Leistungspflicht der Versicherer

Bei Berufsunfällen erbringt derjenige Versicherer die Leistungen, bei dem die Versicherung zur Zeit des Unfalles bestanden hat. Bei Berufskrankheiten ist der Versicherer zu Leistungen verpflichtet, bei dem die Versicherung bestanden hat, als der Versicherte zuletzt durch schädigende Stoffe oder bestimmte Arbeiten oder durch berufliche Tätigkeiten gefährdet war.

Bei Nichtberufsunfällen erbringt derjenige Versicherer die Leistungen, bei dem der Verunfallte zuletzt auch gegen Berufsunfälle versichert war.

Der Bundesrat ordnet die Leistungspflicht und das Zusammenwirken der Versicherer: a. für Versicherte, die von verschiedenen Arbeitgebern beschäftigt werden; b. bei einem erneuten Unfall, namentlich wenn er zum Verlust paariger Organe oder zu anderen Änderungen des Invaliditätsgrades führt; c. beim Tode beider Elternteile; d. bei Berufskrankheiten, die in mehreren, bei verschiedenen Versicherern versicherten Betrieben verursacht wurden.

← Art. 76 UVG Bundesgesetz vom 20. März 1981 über die Unfallversicherung (UVG) Art. 78 UVG →

Fragen Sie sich, wie diese Gesetzesbestimmung auf Ihren Fall anwendbar ist?

Prüfen Sie diesen Erlass zusammen mit Rechtsprechung, Kommentaren und verwandten Gesetzesbestimmungen in Legislator AI.

Fall in Legislator öffnen →

Gerichtsentscheide zu dieser Bestimmung (39)

UV.2024.21 · sg (Art. 77 UVG)
Insurance Coverage Lapse for Subsequent Accident Upheld
This article concerning the responsible insurer in multiple accident scenarios was examined, although ultimately found not to lead to liability under Art. 100 UVV.
C-3380/2020 (Art. 77 Abs. 1 UVG)
Pneumoconiosis Exclusion for Pleural Mesothelioma Cost-Sharing
Establishes that for occupational diseases, the insurer is liable who was responsible for insurance at the time of the last exposure.
C-3380/2020 (Art. 77 Abs. 3 Bst. d UVG)
Pneumoconiosis Exclusion for Pleural Mesothelioma Cost-Sharing
Grants the Federal Council the authority to regulate liability and cooperation among insurers, particularly for occupational diseases.
A/2853/2022 · ge (art. 77 LAA)
Subsequent Accident Aggravation Triggers New Insurer Liability
The court implicitly relied on this article when determining that the SUVA (intimée) was the responsible insurer based on the timing of the second accident.
UV.2022.00131 · zh (Art. 77 Abs. 1 UVG)
Chronic Rhinosinusitis Causation in Occupational Disease Claim
This provision, concerning which insurer is liable for occupational diseases, was cited in the reasoning section laying out the relevant law, but was not explicitly used in the final orders.
UV.2022.00229 · zh (Art. 77 Abs. 1 UVG)
Claimant's Occupational Disease Claim Barred by Prior Appeal and Successor Insurer Responsibility
This provision was discussed extensively but was not explicitly cited in the dispositive orders, which only concern the dismissal of the appeal and procedural matters.
C-2460/2020 (Art. 77 al. 2 LAA)
Swiss Supplementary Insurer Liable for Cross-Border Paragliding Accident
Used to determine that in case of a non-professional accident, the insurer with whom the victim was last insured against professional accidents must provide benefits, and here it was the Caisse supplétive.
200 2020 723 · be (Art. 77 Abs. 1 UVG)
Day Mother vs. Accident Insurer: Wrist Injury Causation and Credibility Dispute
Cited in the reasoning to establish which insurer is liable, which was necessary to determine the correct respondent (Beschwerdegegnerin).
200 2020 723 · be (Art. 77 Abs. 2 UVG)
Day Mother vs. Accident Insurer: Wrist Injury Causation and Credibility Dispute
Cited in the reasoning to establish which insurer is liable.
605 2019 248 · fr (Art. 77 UVG)
Claimant v. Mandatory Accident Insurer (Knee Injury Benefits)
Although cited extensively in the reasoning regarding insurer responsibility for subsequent accidents, this article is relevant contextually for the dispute over which insurer is responsible, which is the subject of the appeal decision.
35.2018.44 · ti (Art. 77 cpv. 3 LAINF)
Insurer Liability for Subsequent Accident Impairment
Cited in the reasoning regarding the delegation of competence to the Federal Council to regulate inter-insurer cooperation.
UV.2016.00289 · zh (Art. 77 Abs. 3 UVG)
Insurer Did Not Cause Lasting Worsening of Pre-existing Knee Condition
Cited as the legal basis for the Federal Council to regulate the liability and cooperation of insurers, particularly in cases of new accidents.
605 2017 135 · fr (Art. 77 Abs. 2 UVG)
Volleyball Player International Match Injury Non-Occupational Accident Determination
This article determines which insurer must provide benefits in the case of non-occupational accidents, which the court concluded the incident was.
UV.2016.47 · sg (Art. 77 Abs. 2 UVG)
Appeal of Cessation of Non-Occupational Accident Insurance Benefits Due to Shoulder Injury Causation Dispute
The article establishing which insurer is liable for non-occupational accidents is referenced in the reasoning concerning the primary insurer's liability, even if the final order only remands the case.
C-1491/2016 (art. 77 al. 2 LAA)
SUVA v. GMA: Helicopter Crash Accident Benefits Dispute
Determines that the accident is non-occupational and thus falls under the responsibility of the insurer of the victim's employer for non-occupational accidents.