Legislator Rechtsprechung & Gesetzgebung
832.20 UVGLAALAINF CH

Art. 47 Bundesgesetz vom 20. März 1981 über die Unfallversicherung (UVG) - Autopsie

UVG; Dritter Titel: Versicherungsleistungen; 4. Kapitel: Festsetzung und Gewährung der Leistungen
Originalquelle öffnen Gesamter Erlass (137 Artikel) Maschinenlesbares Markdown (.md)

Art. 47 UVG · Autopsie

Der Bundesrat bestimmt, unter welchen Voraussetzungen der Versicherer die Autopsie oder einen ähnlichen Eingriff bei einem tödlich Verunfallten anordnen kann. Die Autopsie darf nicht angeordnet werden, wenn die nächsten Angehörigen dagegen Einsprache erheben oder eine entsprechende Willenserklärung des Verstorbenen vorliegt.

← Art. 46 UVG Bundesgesetz vom 20. März 1981 über die Unfallversicherung (UVG) Art. 48 UVG →

Fragen Sie sich, wie diese Gesetzesbestimmung auf Ihren Fall anwendbar ist?

Prüfen Sie diesen Erlass zusammen mit Rechtsprechung, Kommentaren und verwandten Gesetzesbestimmungen in Legislator AI.

Fall in Legislator öffnen →

Gerichtsentscheide zu dieser Bestimmung (56)

32.2010.318 · ti (art. 47 LAINF)
Claimant v. Insurance Office (Disability Benefits Remand for Psychiatric Assessment)
Cited by the court in the reasoning regarding the proper procedure for fact-finding, although the final orders reference the necessary further investigation based on the flawed assessment.
32.2010.325 · ti (Art. 47 LAINF)
Disability Benefits Appeal Based on Inadequate Orthopedic and Psychiatric Evaluation
Cited in the reasoning (2.10) as the principle according to which it is the insurer's duty to establish the facts ex officio.
32.2010.9 · ti (Art. 47 LAINF)
Insured Person v. Pension Administration (Disability Review Aggravation)
Cited in reasoning (2.8) regarding the insurer's duty to ascertain facts, but not in the dispositive orders.
35.2009.35 · ti (Art. 47 LAINF)
Insurance Coverage Dispute Over Back Injury Assessment
Mentioned within the reasoning to support the court's procedural decision regarding the duty to investigate facts, though not explicitly in the final orders, it is mentioned as part of the legal argument being followed (criticism of prior jurisprudence).
32.2009.64 · ti (art. 47 LAINF)
Appeal Against Denial of Disability Benefits and Insufficient Workplace Adjustments
Cited in the reasoning, but not explicitly used in the final orders, therefore excluded based on the strict rule.
UV.2007.00200 · zh (Art. 47 UVG)
Insurer Liability for Late Manifestation of Accident Sequelae Upheld on Remand
Mentioned in the reasoning regarding the insurer's duty to investigate requests concerning relapses or late effects.
UV.2007.00200 · zh (Art. 47 UVG)
Claimant v. Insurer: Workplace Injury Consequences and Benefit Calculations
Cited as the provision governing the insurer's obligation to gather necessary clarifications regarding a claim for relapse or late effects (in its version valid until Dec. 31, 2002).
32.2008.147 · ti (Art. 47 LAINF)
Disability Appeal Remanded for Comprehensive Medical Reassessment
Mentioned in the context of the principle that it is the insurer's duty to establish facts ex officio, which the TCA agrees with in principle.
32.2008.126 · ti (art. 47 LAINF)
Insurance Disability Appeal for Psychiatric Evaluation Remand
The text discusses this article as the principle placing the duty to ascertain facts (including ordering medical expertise) on the insurer, which the court references when justifying the referral back to the administration for further investigation.
UV.2007.00085 · zh (Art. 47 Abs. 1 UVG)
Insurance Benefits Appeal for Post-Accident Symptoms Remanded for Further Imaging
This provision (duty of inquiry) underpins the decision to remit the case for further medical investigation as ordered in point 1.
UV.2007.00085 · zh (Art. 47 Abs. 1 UVG)
Appeal Regarding Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder and Cognitive Impairment Following Motor Vehicle Accident
Cited implicitly in the reasoning (Erw. 1.5) as the legal basis for the duty of the social insurance institution to establish the facts ex officio, which governs the remand order.
32.2007.343 · ti (art. 47 LAINF)
Disability Benefits Appeal Remanded for Clarification of Psychiatric Evaluation
Cited in the reasoning (2.11.) regarding the insurer's duty to ascertain facts by ordering expert opinions, which supports the decision to remand the case for further investigation.
32.2007.83 · ti (art. 47 LAINF)
Smith v. Social Security Administration
Mentioned in the reasoning (2.13.1) while discussing the principle that the insurer, not the court, is responsible for fact-finding, but not explicitly cited in the dispositive orders.
35.2007.40 · ti (art. 47 LAINF)
Worker v. Accident Insurance Provider (Short-Term Benefits Termination Appeal)
Cited in legal commentary within the reasoning concerning the duty of the insurer to ascertain facts, which influenced the decision to remand the case.
35.2007.66 · ti (art. 47 LAINF)
Insurance Coverage Appeal for Shoulder and Psychological Issues
Cited in the reasoning (para 2.8) to explain the insurer's duty to ascertain facts, which formed the basis for remanding the case for further investigation.