830.11
ATSVOPGA
CH
CH
Art. 12 Verordnung vom 11. September 2002 über den Allgemeinen Teil des Sozialversicherungsrechts (ATSV) - Einspracheentscheid
ATSV; 2. Kapitel: Allgemeine Verfahrensbestimmungen
Art. 12 ATSV · Einspracheentscheid
Der Versicherer ist an das Begehren der Einsprache führenden Person nicht gebunden. Er kann die Verfügung zu Gunsten oder zu Ungunsten der Einsprache führenden Partei abändern.
Beabsichtigt er, die Verfügung zu Ungunsten der Einsprache führenden Person abzuändern, gibt er ihr Gelegenheit zum Rückzug der Einsprache.
Gerichtsentscheide zu dieser Bestimmung (102)
AL.2024.00101 · zh (Art. 12 Abs. 1 ATSV)
Voluntary Resignation Due to Perceived Workload Justifies Unemployment Penalty
Cited in the reasoning explaining why the sanction could be increased upon appeal review (reformatio in peius).
AL.2024.00101 · zh (Art. 12 Abs. 2 ATSV)
Voluntary Resignation Due to Perceived Workload Justifies Unemployment Penalty
Cited in the reasoning explaining the procedural requirement to warn the appellant about the risk of a worse outcome upon appeal review.
30.2023.14 · ti (Art. 12 OPGA)
Applicant v. Social Security Administration (Rental Income Classification)
Cited to support the administrative action of modifying the decision against the appellant's interest following opposition, provided the appellant was warned ('reformatio in pejus').
42.2023.24 · ti (Art. 12 ATSV)
Social Assistance Property Sale Obligation Upheld Despite Procedural Flaw in Reissuance of Order
Cited in reasoning regarding the insurer's right to modify a decision upon appeal, even to the detriment of the appealing party, provided proper procedure is followed.
42.2023.24 · ti (art. 12 cpv. 2 ATSV)
Social Assistance Property Sale Obligation Upheld Despite Procedural Flaw in Reissuance of Order
Cited in reasoning to explain that procedural requirements regarding notifying the party before unfavorable modification of a decision were met.
AL.2022.00100 · zh (Art. 12 ATSV)
Denial of Unemployment Benefits Upheld Due to Lack of Demonstrated Employability
Cited regarding the scope of review in appeal proceedings where the insurer can alter the contested decision.
AL.2022.00100 · zh (Art. 12 Abs. 2 ATSV)
Denial of Unemployment Benefits Upheld Due to Lack of Demonstrated Employability
Cited specifically regarding the possibility for the authority to amend the decision to the detriment of the appellant, provided the right to withdraw the appeal is granted.
AL.2022.00100 · zh (Art. 12 Abs. 2 ATSV)
Unemployment Benefits Denied Due to Lack of Employability and Insufficient Job Search
Cited in conjunction with Art. 1 Abs. 1 AVIG and Art. 81 ATSG regarding the insurer's ability to amend decisions in favor or against the appealing party during the objection procedure, specifically mentioning the opportunity to withdraw the objection in the latter case.
EL.2022.2 · bs (Art. 12 Abs. 1 ATSV)
Supplementary Benefit Recalculation and Recovery Offsetting Upheld Against Prior Repayment Agreement
Cited in the reasoning regarding the principle that the insurer is not bound by the applicant's requests during the objection procedure.
EL.2022.2 · bs (Art. 12 Abs. 2 ATSV)
Supplementary Benefit Recalculation and Recovery Offsetting Upheld Against Prior Repayment Agreement
Cited in the reasoning regarding the right to withdraw the objection in case of a reformatio in peius.
Arr.t.2022.262 · vd (Art. 12 al. 2 OPGA)
Claimant v. Unemployment Insurance Fund (Repayment of Benefits After Annulment of Initial Approval)
The decision was annulled and the case was remanded to the respondent to proceed in accordance with this provision, which concerns the procedure for reforming a decision to the detriment of the appellant.
VSBES.2021.165 · so (Art. 12 Abs. 1 ATSV)
Insurer Denial Upheld for Unidentified Object Causing Dental Fracture During Consumption
Cited in the reasoning regarding the admissibility of a reformatio in peius in the objection procedure.
ZL.2020.00100 · zh (Art. 12 Abs. 2 ATSV)
Appeal of Retroactive Benefit Reduction and Repayment Order Based on Erroneous Income Calculation
Regulation requiring the party to be informed of a detrimental change and given an opportunity to withdraw the appeal.
ACH.98.21.154.2021 · vd (Art. 12 al. 2 OPGA)
Employer Opposition to Short-Time Work Benefit Reduction Due to Procedural Error
The decision was annulled and the case referred back to the administrative body because it failed to offer the appellant the opportunity to withdraw her opposition before issuing a decision to her detriment (reformatio in peius).
AM.13.20.25.2021 · vd (Art. 12 al. 1 OPGA)
Insured Person v. Sickness Insurer: Reversal of Sickness Benefit Cancellation and Reimbursement Order
This article related to the insurer's right to modify the decision (reformatio in pejus), which was central to the dispute.