830.11 ATSVOPGA

CH

Art. 10 Verordnung vom 11. September 2002 über den Allgemeinen Teil des Sozialversicherungsrechts (ATSV) - Grundsatz

ATSV; 2. Kapitel: Allgemeine Verfahrensbestimmungen

Originalquelle öffnen Gesamter Erlass (56 Artikel) Maschinenlesbares Markdown (.md)

Art. 10 ATSV · Grundsatz

Einsprachen müssen ein Rechtsbegehren und eine Begründung enthalten.

Die Einsprache ist schriftlich zu erheben gegen eine Verfügung, die: a. der Einsprache nach Artikel 52 ATSG unterliegt und eine Leistung nach dem Bundesgesetz vom 25. Juni 1982 über die obligatorische Arbeitslosenversicherung und die Insolvenzentschädigung oder deren Rückforderung zum Gegenstand hat; b. von einem Durchführungsorgan der Arbeitssicherheit im Sinne der Artikel 47–51 der Verordnung vom 19. Dezember 1983 über die Verhütung von Unfällen und Berufskrankheiten erlassen wurde.

In allen übrigen Fällen kann die Einsprache wahlweise schriftlich oder bei persönlicher Vorsprache mündlich erhoben werden.

Die schriftlich erhobene Einsprache muss die Unterschrift der Einsprache führenden Person oder ihres Rechtsbeistands enthalten. Bei einer mündlich erhobenen Einsprache hält der Versicherer die Einsprache in einem Protokoll fest; die Person, welche die Einsprache führt, oder ihr Rechtsbeistand muss das Protokoll unterzeichnen.

Genügt die Einsprache den Anforderungen nach Absatz 1 nicht oder fehlt die Unterschrift, so setzt der Versicherer eine angemessene Frist zur Behebung der Mängel an und verbindet damit die Androhung, dass sonst auf die Einsprache nicht eingetreten wird.

← Art. 9b ATSV Verordnung vom 11. September 2002 über den Allgemeinen Teil des Sozialversicherungsrechts (ATSV) Art. 11 ATSV →

Gerichtsentscheide zu dieser Bestimmung (475)

38.2025.41 · ti (art. 10 cpv. 4 OPGA)

Insured Party v. Administrative Body Regarding Unemployment Benefit Suspension Appeal Admissibility

Cited in the reasoning section to establish that the initial opposition failed due to lack of handwritten signature via email, but the failure to notify the party of the defect before the deadline was the basis for the decision.

38.2025.41 · ti (art. 10 cpv. 5 OPGA)

Insured Party v. Administrative Body Regarding Unemployment Benefit Suspension Appeal Admissibility

The court found that the administrative body should have granted a supplementary deadline based on this provision for the appellant to correct the formal defects (lack of signature/motivation) instead of rejecting the opposition outright.

730.2025.172 · bl (Art. 10 Abs. 1 ATSV)

Health Insurer Justified in Non-Entry Decision After Insured's Unclear Objection

This provision is cited as requiring objections to include a legal claim and a justification.

730.2025.172 · bl (Art. 10 Abs. 5 ATSV)

Health Insurer Justified in Non-Entry Decision After Insured's Unclear Objection

This provision is cited because the insurer set a deadline for the insured to remedy deficiencies in his objection, with the threat of non-admittance.

200 2025 33 · be (Art. 10 ATSV)

Insurer Appeal on Timeliness of Objection to Coverage Denial Following Subsequent Incident

Cited in the reasoning (E. 3.2.1) to establish the formal requirements for an objection.

605 2024 198 · fr (Art. 10 al. 1 OPGA)

Unemployment Benefit Appeal Regarding Registration Date and Procedural Opposition

Cited in section 6.1 as the requirement regarding conclusions and motivation for an objection that the Fund should have informed the applicant about.

605 2024 198 · fr (Art. 10 al. 5 OPGA)

Unemployment Benefit Appeal Regarding Registration Date and Procedural Opposition

Cited in section 6.1 regarding the rule that the insurer must grant a reasonable period to correct the defect of signature if the objection was sent by email before the deadline.

605 2024 198 · fr (art. 10 OPGA)

Unemployment Benefit Appeal Regarding Registration Date and Procedural Opposition

Cited in order II as the standard for filing a compliant objection following the restitution of the appeal deadline.

VSBES.2024.237 · so (Art. 10 Abs. 5 ATSV)

Disability Benefits Appeal Remand for 2020; Rejection of 2022 Rent Claims Upheld

Cited in the reasoning to explain the procedural requirement for curing defects in an appeal, which is relevant to the decision to remit the case regarding the 2020 benefits.

730.2024.330 · bl (Art. 10 Abs. 1 ATSV)

Insurer Must Consider Appeal Despite Unclear Argument

This article requires objections to include a legal claim and justification, which was a central point of contention and the basis for the initial non-admission decision.

730.2024.330 · bl (Art. 10 Abs. 5 ATSV)

Insurer Must Consider Appeal Despite Unclear Argument

This article, concerning setting a grace period for rectifying deficiencies in an objection, was applied by the insurance carrier and reviewed by the court.

UV.2025.00087 · zh (Art. 10 Abs. 1 ATSV)

Insurance Denial Appeal Dismissed for Lack of Justification and Abuse of Process

The appeal was dismissed because the initial appeal (Einsprache) lacked a sufficient substantiation as required by this provision.

605 2024 2 · fr (Art. 10 al. 1 OPGA)

Appeal Against Reimbursement Obligation for Short-Time Work Allowances Paid to Pensioner

Cited in the reasoning concerning the requirement for an opposition to contain conclusions and be motivated.

605 2024 2 · fr (Art. 10 al. 2 let. a OPGA)

Appeal Against Reimbursement Obligation for Short-Time Work Allowances Paid to Pensioner

Cited in the reasoning concerning the formal requirement for opposition to be submitted in writing.

605 2024 2 · fr (Art. 10 al. 5 OPGA)

Appeal Against Reimbursement Obligation for Short-Time Work Allowances Paid to Pensioner

Cited implicitly in the reasoning to justify the annulment because the Caisse should have requested clarification regarding the nature of the appeal.