Art. 48 Bundesgesetz vom 20. Juni 2014 über Lebensmittel und Gebrauchsgegenstände (LMG) - Laboratorien

VPB 2006.1334 (Art. 48 al. 1 let. n LDAl)

Swiss Foodstuffs Act Amendments: Enhanced Safety and Traceability

Cited as the basis for punishing violations related to operating permits, reporting obligations, self-monitoring, duty to inform, and traceability.

VPB 2006.1334 (Art. 48 al. 1bis LDAl)

Swiss Foodstuffs Act Amendments: Enhanced Safety and Traceability

Cited as the basis for punishing negligent violations of provisions related to operating permits, reporting obligations, self-monitoring, duty to inform, and traceability.

VB.2003.00013 · zh (Art. 48 lit. I h LMG)

Appeal Regarding Prohibition of Advertisements for Micronutrient Supplement

Cited in the context of the legal provisions governing the matter.

ST.2014.96 · sg (Art. 48 Abs. 1 lit. g i.V.m. Art. 7 LMG (SR 817.0) i.V.m. Art. 9 Abs. 1 lit. c VSFK (SR 817.190))

Accessory Liability for Transporting Contaminated Livestock

This provision defines the main offense (violation of the Food Act) for which the appellant was convicted as an accomplice.

ST.2014.96 · sg (Art. 48 Abs. 2 LMG (SR 817.0))

Accessory Liability for Transporting Contaminated Livestock

Cited as the rule making complicity to a violation of the Food Act punishable.

ST.2014.96 · sg (Art. 48 Abs. 1 lit. g i.V.m. Art. 7 LMG (SR 817.0) i.V.m. Art. 9 Abs. 1 lit. c VSFK (SR 817.190), Art. 25 StGB (SR 311.0) i.V.m. Art. 48 Abs. 2 LMG (SR 817.0) und Art. 26 StGB (SR 311.0))

Transport Operator Convicted of Aiding and Abetting Food Law Violation for Transporting Contaminated Slaughter Animals

These are the provisions under which the accused was found guilty of aiding and abetting a violation of the Food Act.

30.2008.264 · ti (art. 18, 48 cpv. 1 LDerr; 8 cpv. 2. 10, 26 ODerr; 2, 11, 12 OCDerr)

Director's Personal Liability Upheld for Food Safety Violations

These substantive administrative provisions were cited in the preamble as the basis for the original decision, which was confirmed in order 1.

30.2008.181 · ti (art. 48 LDerr)

Food Safety Violation Appeal and Fine Reduction

This article, governing the penalty for contravening hygiene regulations, was cited in the final order preamble, although the court ultimately acquitted the appellant based on the principle 'nulla poena sine lege' for the specific charge under this article related to self-monitoring.

30.2007.189 · ti (art. 48 cpv. 1 LDerr)

Hotel Food Safety Fine Upheld on Appeal

Cited in the final orders, this article defines the penalty for contravening hygiene regulations related to food.

30.2007.14 · ti (art. 48 LDerr)

Cantonal Laboratory Fine Upheld for Misleading Wine Labeling

Cited in the final resolution as part of the legal basis for confirming the decision regarding the offense.

PS.2006.0202 · vd (Art. 48 al. 1 let. h LDAL)

Claimant v. Unemployment Insurance Authority (Forced Deceptive Practices)

Cited regarding the illegality of the employer's alleged actions, which forms the justification for potentially excluding fault under unemployment law.

PS.2006.0202 · vd (Art. 48 al. 2 LDAL)

Claimant v. Unemployment Insurance Authority (Forced Deceptive Practices)

Cited regarding the punishability of complicity in the employer's alleged actions, which forms the justification for potentially excluding fault under unemployment law.

30.2003.335 · ti (art. 18 e 48 cpv. 1 LDerr; 19 ODerr)

Manager Fined for Non-Alcoholic Bloody Mary Violating Consumer Deception Laws

These provisions formed the basis for rejecting the appeal and confirming the challenged decision regarding the false designation of the food product.

30.2003.101 · ti (art. 48 cpv. 1 LDerr)

Director Fined for Nickel Leaching in Belt Buckles Appeal

Cited as a provision related to the offense, and included in the final decision preamble (although order 1 annuls the decision based on the merits/procedure).

30.2002.66 · ti (art. 48 cpv. 1 LDerr)

Cantonal Laboratory Fine Upheld for Contaminated Goat Cheese

Cited in the final orders as part of the legal basis for rejecting the appeal, concerning sanctions for non-compliant food production.