Legislator Rechtsprechung & Gesetzgebung
810.11 FMEDGLPMALPAM CH

Art. 19 Bundesgesetz vom 18. Dezember 1998 über die medizinisch unterstützte Fortpflanzung (FMedG) - Auswahl von Spendern

FMedG; 2. Kapitel: Verfahren der medizinisch unterstützten Fortpflanzung
Originalquelle öffnen Gesamter Erlass (50 Artikel) Maschinenlesbares Markdown (.md)

Art. 19 FMedG · Auswahl von Spendern

Spender müssen nach medizinischen Gesichtspunkten sorgfältig ausgewählt werden; namentlich müssen gesundheitliche Risiken für die Empfängerin der gespendeten Samenzellen so weit wie möglich ausgeschlossen sein. Andere Auswahlkriterien sind verboten.

Der Spender darf seine Samenzellen nur einer Stelle zur Verfügung stellen; er ist vor der Spende ausdrücklich darauf hinzuweisen.

← Art. 18 FMedG Bundesgesetz vom 18. Dezember 1998 über die medizinisch unterstützte Fortpflanzung (FMedG) - Gegenstand und Zweck Art. 20 FMedG →

Fragen Sie sich, wie diese Gesetzesbestimmung auf Ihren Fall anwendbar ist?

Prüfen Sie diesen Erlass zusammen mit Rechtsprechung, Kommentaren und verwandten Gesetzesbestimmungen in Legislator AI.

Fall in Legislator öffnen →

Gerichtsentscheide zu dieser Bestimmung (61)

9.2024.213 · ti (art. 19 cpv. 1 LPMA)
Protection Authority v. Parent Regarding Visitation Transport Costs
Cited in the operative part of the ruling, as the basis for distributing the costs of the protection measure management.
9.2024.213 · ti (art. 19 cpv. 2 LPMA)
Protection Authority v. Parent Regarding Visitation Transport Costs
Cited in the operative part of the ruling to affirm that the Authority must advance the costs of the protection measure.
9.2024.213 · ti (art. 19 cpv. 3 LPMA)
Protection Authority v. Parent Regarding Visitation Transport Costs
Cited in the operative part of the ruling when ordering the costs to be advanced by the Authority, reserving the right of recourse against RE 1.
9.2024.42 · ti (art. 19 cpv. 1 LPMA)
Guardian Fee Claim Prescription Appeal
Cited in the reasoning establishing that protection measure costs are borne by the interested person or those responsible for their support.
9.2022.145 · ti (art. 19 cpv. 2 e 3 LPMA)
Curator Remuneration and Expense Allocation Appeal
Cited in the reasoning regarding public entity assumption of costs, which dictates the cost allocation in the final order (Order 1.1).
9.2021.127 · ti (art. 19 cpv. 1 LPMA)
Protection Authority Decision on Educational Guardianship Costs Overturned on Equal Parental Responsibility
This article concerning the charging of protection measure costs was cited in the reasoning (section 4.1) but not in the final orders.
9.2021.18 · ti (art. 19 LPMA)
Guardianship Financial Statement Approval Appeal on Asset Valuation
Cited in the reasoning regarding the principle that the costs of protection measures are borne by the assisted person.
9.2020.97 · ti (art. 19 cpv. 1 LPMA)
Guardian Remuneration and Expense Dispute on Protected Person's Account
Cited to establish the rule that protection measure costs are borne by the protected person or their supporter.
9.2020.97 · ti (art. 19 cpv. 2 LPMA)
Guardian Remuneration and Expense Dispute on Protected Person's Account
Cited in the reasoning concerning the appellant's request to shift costs to the public authority (Municipality).
9.2020.93 · ti (art. 19 cpv. 3 LPMA)
Guardianship Costs and Illiquid Assets Threshold
Cited in the reformed order as the basis for reserving the public entity's right of recourse against RE 1 for the costs advanced.
9.2020.53 · ti (art. 19 cpv. 1 LPMA)
Appeal of Approval of Guardian's Final Reports and Compensation Claim
Cited to support the principle that the costs of the tutelary measure are borne by the interested person, justifying the decision on costs.
9.2019.123 · ti (art. 19 LPMA)
Conservatorship Fees and Intangible Minimum Reserve
Cited in the reasoning to establish the cantonal rule regarding the assumption of costs by the public authority in case of indigence, which frames the decision to reject the appeal.
9.2018.118 · ti (art. 19 LPMA)
Guardianship Costs Liability Despite Limited Liquid Assets
The cantonal procedural rule governing who bears the costs of the protection measure, forming the legal context for the dispute, although not directly in the operative part (dispositive).
9.2019.5 · ti (art. 19 LPMA)
Appeal Against Curator's Fee Assignment Based on Minimum Asset Reserve
Cited in the reasoning section regarding who bears the costs, but the final order only rejects the appeal without explicitly applying it for cost assignment.
9.2018.104 · ti (art. 19 LPMA)
Guardianship Account Approval and Curator Fees Appeal
Cited to establish which entity (interested party, parents, or authority via anticipation) bears the costs of the protection measure.