Legislator Rechtsprechung & Gesetzgebung
784.11 TUGLATCLET CH

Art. 6 Bundesgesetz vom 30. April 1997 über die Organisation der Telekommunikationsunternehmung des Bundes (TUG) - Stellung des Bundes und Drittbeteiligung

TUG
Originalquelle öffnen Gesamter Erlass (29 Artikel) Maschinenlesbares Markdown (.md)

Art. 6 TUG · Stellung des Bundes und Drittbeteiligung

Der Bund ist Aktionär der Unternehmung und muss die kapital- und stimmenmässige Mehrheit halten.

Die Veräusserung von Beteiligungspapieren an Dritte und die Zeichnung von Beteiligungspapieren durch Dritte erfolgen im Rahmen von Absatz 1 nach den Vorschriften des Aktienrechts.

Der Bundesrat legt für jeweils vier Jahre fest, welche Ziele der Bund als Hauptaktionär der Unternehmung erreichen will. Der Verwaltungsrat erstattet dem Bundesrat jährlich Bericht über die Erreichung der Ziele und stellt ihm die zur Überprüfung notwendigen Informationen zur Verfügung.

← Art. 5 TUG Bundesgesetz vom 30. April 1997 über die Organisation der Telekommunikationsunternehmung des Bundes (TUG) - Gegenstand Art. 7 TUG →

Fragen Sie sich, wie diese Gesetzesbestimmung auf Ihren Fall anwendbar ist?

Prüfen Sie diesen Erlass zusammen mit Rechtsprechung, Kommentaren und verwandten Gesetzesbestimmungen in Legislator AI.

Fall in Legislator öffnen →

Gerichtsentscheide zu dieser Bestimmung (35)

AC.2015.0292 · vd (art. 6 al. 1 LATC)
Property Owner Appeal Regarding Agricultural Building Renovation and Land Charge Violation
Cited regarding the fact that public law restrictions on building rights cannot be overridden by conventional clauses, relevant to the land charge analysis concerning vehicle storage.
AC.2013.0467 · vd (Art. 6 LATC)
Appeal Against Building Permit Due to Insufficient Green Space Allocation
This article concerning limitations of property rights and the granting of dispensations was cited in the context of analyzing the municipality's power to grant a waiver for Article 15 RPGA.
AC.2013.0401 · vd (art. 6 LATC)
Property Owner v. Municipality Regarding Building Permit for Garage Extension Encroachment
Cited in the reasoning (Considerand 4.c.aa) concerning the allowance of derogations, which is relevant to the grounds for the annulment.
AC.2010.0038 · vd (Art. 6 LATC al. 2)
Appeal Against Building Permit for Historic Winegrower's Building Renovation
The general conditions for granting deviations from planning law were referenced when assessing the justification for the roof height deviation under Art. 13 RPEP.
AC.2009.0289 · vd (Art. 6 LATC)
Appeal Against Municipal Building Permit for Mixed-Use Development Upheld
Cited to define the nature of building code restrictions and the limits on granting exceptions.
AC.2008.0056 · vd (art. 6 al. 1 LATC)
Foundation v. Municipality Regarding Residential Unit Expansion in Villa Zone
Cited when rejecting the argument based on the principle of good faith and private assurances regarding public building law restrictions.
AC.2008.0144 · vd (Art. 6 LATC)
Neighbors' Appeal Against Villa Construction Permit Dismissed
Governs the conditions under which municipalities can grant deviations from zoning regulations.
AC.2006.0109 · vd (art. 6 LATC)
Residents v. Municipality Regarding Residential Buildings in Leisure Zone
Cited in the reasoning regarding the requirement for a legal basis for property restrictions, but not explicitly in the dispositive orders (I-IV).
AC.2006.0079 · vd (art. 6 al. 2 LATC)
Municipality Building Permit Denial Upheld Due to Servitude Ambiguity and Zoning Violation
This provision was cited in the reasoning to reject the argument for a regulatory exception regarding the number of floors, which contributed to the refusal.
AC.2003.0125 · vd (Art. 6 LATC)
Property Owner v. Municipality Regarding Terrace Conversion and Gross Floor Area Calculation
The court explicitly states it does not have to rule on the interpretation of the previous settlement agreement, referencing Art. 6 LATC for this limit on jurisdiction.
AC.1995.0273 · vd (art. 6 al. 1 LATC)
Property Owners v. Municipality Regarding Demolition Order and Subsequent Authorization
Cited in the reasoning as the rule forbidding private agreements to derogate from public building law.
AC.1995.0273 · vd (art. 6 al. 2 LATC)
Property Owners v. Municipality Regarding Demolition Order and Subsequent Authorization
Cited in the reasoning as the rule limiting authorities to granting derogations only within the limits set by law, regulations, and plans.
AC.1999.0179 · vd (Art. 6 al. 2 LATC)
Neighbors v. Municipality: Building Permit for Archaeological Shelter Overturned Due to Zoning Violations
The court implicitly used the principle stemming from this article to determine that the Municipality could not grant deviations from building regulations without a legal basis.
AC.2004.0087 · vd (art. 6 al. 1 LATC)
Neighbor Appeal of Building Permit Regarding Garage Encroachment and Villa Placement
Cited in the reasoning when analyzing the property rights limitations, though not explicitly in the final orders, it is connected to the substantive issue decided.
AC.2004.0104 · vd (art. 6 al. 2 LATC)
Neighboring Property Dispute Over Building Permit Annulment Due to Aggravated Setback Violation
Mentioned in the reasoning in relation to the requirement for a municipal regulatory basis for granting derogations.