784.11
TUGLATCLET
CH
CH
Art. 17 Bundesgesetz vom 30. April 1997 über die Organisation der Telekommunikationsunternehmung des Bundes (TUG) - Berufliche Vorsorge
TUG
Art. 17 TUG · Berufliche Vorsorge
Das Personal der Unternehmung wird bei der Pensionskasse des Bundes versichert.
Die Unternehmung kann mit Zustimmung des Bundesrates eigene Pensionskassen führen oder sich anderen Vorsorgeeinrichtungen anschliessen.
Gerichtsentscheide zu dieser Bestimmung (28)
AC.2018.0123 · vd (art. 17 LATC)
Neighbors v. Municipality: Zoning Violation in Residential Conversion
Cited in conjunction with art. 3.1 RC to support the argument that municipal authorities must enforce legal and regulatory provisions.
AC.2016.0164 · vd (Art. 17 et 104 de la loi du 4 décembre 1985 sur l’aménagement du territoire et les constructions (LATC; RSV 700.11))
Municipality v. Appellant: Permit Denial Based on Zoning Non-Compliance
Cited in the reasoning to establish the competence of the municipality for building permits, which underpins the decision.
AC.2014.0031 · vd (art. 17 al. 1 LATC)
Association v. Municipality on Chalet Construction Permit
Cited in the reasoning section regarding the municipality's duty to enforce legal and regulatory provisions.
AC.2014.0031 · vd (art. 17 al. 3 LATC)
Association v. Municipality on Chalet Construction Permit
Cited in the reasoning section regarding the municipality's verification of project conformity before issuing a building permit.
AC.2015.0135 · vd (Art. 17 LATC)
Property Owners v. Municipality: Annulment of Demolition Ban on Architecturally Interesting Villa
Cited by the court as the basis for municipal competence in applying land use planning rules relevant to construction aesthetic and integration.
AC.2014.0387 · vd (art. 17 LATC)
Fence Demolition Order Modification Due to Permit Violation and Zoning Conflict
Cited in the reasoning to establish that the municipality is the competent authority for building permits, thus linking any assurances from municipal employees to the municipality's scope.
AC.2014.0376 · vd (art. 17 et 104 LATC)
Property Owners v. Municipality Regarding Demolition Permit Refusal Based on Non-Binding Heritage Opinion
These provisions concerning the municipality's competence in applying communal rules for built heritage protection were cited in the reasoning supporting the assessment of the municipality's error.
AC.2012.0238 · vd (art. 17 al. 1 LATC)
Neighbors v. Municipality Regarding Building Permit for Terrace and Retaining Wall
Cited in the reasoning regarding the municipality's duties, but not explicitly in the final dispositive orders I, II, or III.
AC.2012.0202 · vd (Art. 17 et 104 LATC)
Municipality Refusal Based on Faulty Heritage Authorization Requirement
Cited in the reasoning as the basis for the municipality's primary competence to apply communal protection rules.
AC.2012.0176 · vd (art. 17 et 104 LATC)
Property Owners v. Municipality (Photovoltaic Panel Permit Refusal)
Cited in the reasoning regarding the municipality's primary role in applying communal protection rules.
AC.2011.0291 · vd (art. 17 LATC)
State Department Appeal Regarding Municipal Building Permit Derogation
The appellant argued that the decision violated this article by improperly authorizing construction in a zone not intended for it.
AC.2011.0295 · vd (art. 17 et 104 de la loi du 4 décembre 1985 sur l’aménagement du territoire et les constructions (LATC, RSV 700.11))
Municipal Refusal of Building Permit Appeal for Basement Conversion Upheld
Cited in the reasoning to establish that the municipality, not municipal officials, has the competence to issue building permits, refuting the good faith argument.
AC.2009.0253 · vd (Art. 17 LATC (RSV 700.11))
Appeal Against Building Permit for Villa Regarding Height Calculation
Cited within the reasoning for context regarding the municipality's obligation to ensure compliance with legal and regulatory requirements.
AC.2007.0322 · vd (art. 17 LATC)
Demolition Order Upheld for Unauthorized Reconstruction on Agricultural Land
Cited in the reasoning regarding the exemplary conduct expected of the appellant as a municipal, which supports the finding of bad faith in the proportionality assessment.
AC.2008.0032 · vd (art. 17 al. 3 LATC)
Recipients v. Municipality (Mootness of Appeal after Revised Road Service Authorization)
Cited in the reasoning to establish municipal competence for building permits, but not in the dispositive.