784.10 FMGLTC

CH

Art. 36 Fernmeldegesetz (FMG) - Enteignungs- und Mitbenutzungsrecht

FMG; 5. Kapitel: Fernmeldeanlagen

Originalquelle öffnen Gesamter Erlass (109 Artikel) Maschinenlesbares Markdown (.md)

Art. 36 FMG · Enteignungs- und Mitbenutzungsrecht

Liegt die Erstellung einer Fernmeldeanlage im öffentlichen Interesse, so erteilt das UVEK das Enteignungsrecht. Das Verfahren richtet sich nach dem Enteignungsgesetz vom 20. Juni 1930 .

Das BAKOM kann auf Antrag aus Gründen des öffentlichen Interesses, namentlich um den Anliegen der Raumplanung, des Landschafts-, Heimat-, Umwelt, Natur- und Tierschutzes oder technischen Schwierigkeiten Rechnung zu tragen, Anbieterinnen von Fernmeldediensten verpflichten, Dritten gegen angemessenes Entgelt die Mitbenutzung ihrer Fernmeldeanlagen und anderen Anlagen, wie Kabelkanäle und Sendestandorte, zu gestatten, wenn die Anlagen über ausreichende Kapazität verfügen.

Unter denselben Voraussetzungen kann das BAKOM Anbieterinnen von Fernmeldediensten verpflichten, Fernmeldeanlagen und andere Anlagen, wie Kabelkanäle und Sendestandorte, gemeinsam zu installieren und zu nutzen.

← Art. 35b FMG Fernmeldegesetz (FMG) - Zweck Art. 36a FMG →

Gerichtsentscheide zu dieser Bestimmung (12)

VVGE.2005.06.Nr.41 · ow (Art. 36 Abs. 1 FMG)

Mobile Antenna Permit Without Landowner Consent Upheld; Relocation for Health Concerns Rejected

Cited as a potential basis for the applicant to obtain a right of expropriation.

VPB i-sur-les-t-l-commun (Art. 36 LTC)

Administrative Decision Revoking Telephone Number for Non-Payment of Fees

The decision refers to the revocation of assigned address elements, which is covered by this article.

A-6750/2016 (Art. 36 Abs. 1 FMG)

Expropriation for Telecommunication Data Transmission on Power Lines

This provision establishes that the competent department grants the expropriation right, and the court found that the Federal Office of Energy (BFE) was not the competent department.

A-5014/2013 (Art. 36 Abs. 1 FMG)

Telecommunications Company v. Property Owners: Eminent Domain for Underground Cable Upheld

This provision is the legal basis for the granting of expropriation rights for telecommunication facilities, which is the core of the dispute.

VB.2009.00163 · zh (Art. 36 Abs. III FMG)

Mobile Antenna Permit Denial Upheld Near Protected Villa

This provision is cited as part of the legal basis for the decision, indicating it was considered in the court's final order.

VB.2008.00285 · zh (Art. 36 Abs. III FMG)

Cellular Antenna Permit Denial Upheld Due to Visual Intrusion Near Protected Area

Cited in the case context, though its specific role in the dispositive is not detailed here, it is listed under 'Rechtsnormen'.

BRKE.IV.Nrn.0002.00 · zh (Art. 36 FMG)

Municipal Council Land Registry Restriction on Antenna Sharing Nullified for Lack of Jurisdiction

The court implicitly relied on the context surrounding this article as the basis for the administrative power being disputed, even though the final order focused on competence.

V 04 374 1 · lu (Art. 36 Abs. 2 FMG)

Appeal Against Building Permit for Mobile Communication Base Station Due to Flawed Environmental Opinion Procedure

Cited in reasoning to clarify that this provision only regulates the right to co-use facilities and does not provide substantive planning requirements for site coordination.

V 04 374 2 · lu (Art. 36 Abs. 2 FMG)

Antenna Placement Coordination and Regulatory Enforcement

Cited in relation to the right to co-use telecommunication facilities, but considered not to provide substantive planning requirements.

V 03 209 · lu (Art. 36 Abs. 1 des Fernmeldegesetzes vom 30. April 1997 (FMG; SR 784.10))

Telecommunications Antenna Permit Termination Upheld Due to Withdrawn Landowner Consent

Cited to dismiss the appellant's argument that an expropriation right could grant access to the building site.

VB.2008.00285 · zh (Art. 36 Abs. III FMG)

Townscape Protection vs. Mobile Antenna Permit Denial

This provision relates to the requirement for necessary network coverage, which was weighed against aesthetic concerns.

VB.2009.00163 · zh (Art. 36 Abs. III FMG)

Cellular Antenna Permit Denial Upheld Near Neoclassical Villa

This provision relates to the possible co-use of a transmission site by other providers, as mentioned in the reasoning regarding the possibility of closing a coverage gap.