783.0
PGLPO
CH
CH
Art. 29 Postgesetz (PG)
PG; 2. Kapitel: Postdienste
Art. 29 PG
Die PostCom richtet eine Schlichtungsstelle ein oder beauftragt Dritte damit.
Bei Streitigkeiten zwischen Kundinnen oder Kunden und Anbieterinnen von Postdiensten kann jede Partei die Schlichtungsstelle anrufen.
Wer die Schlichtungsstelle anruft, zahlt eine Behandlungsgebühr. Die Anbieterin von Postdiensten trägt die Verfahrenskosten abzüglich der Behandlungsgebühr. Erfolgt der Schlichtungsentscheid zugunsten der Kundin oder des Kunden, erhält sie oder er die Behandlungsgebühr von der Anbieterin von Postdiensten zurückerstattet.
Die Parteien sind durch den Schlichtungsentscheid nicht gebunden.
Gerichtsentscheide zu dieser Bestimmung (16)
VB.2023.00360 · zh (§ 29 Abs. 1 lit. b PG)
Suspension Salary Dispute Following Justified Precautionary Suspension Due to Employee Culpability
This provision is cited as the legal norm applied in the decision regarding the denial of wage payment following suspension from office.
VB.2023.00360 · zh (§ 29 Abs. 2 PG)
Suspension Salary Dispute Following Justified Precautionary Suspension Due to Employee Culpability
This provision is cited as the legal norm applied in the decision regarding the denial of wage payment following suspension from office.
B.2021.211 · sg (Art. 29 Abs. 1 lit. d PG)
Bus Driver Entry Ban Upheld for City, Overturned for Canton
This is the legal basis cited by the police for the initial measures, and its application is implicitly reviewed in the finding that the first measure (Fernhaltung) was lawful.
B.2021.211 · sg (Art. 29 Abs. 1 lit. d PG)
Bus Driver Transporting Protestors Exclusion Order Validity
This provision was cited as the legal basis for the initial police measures, and the decision concerns its application regarding the removal order.
OG O4V 20 34 ARGVP 2 · ar (Art. 29 Abs. 1 PG)
Unlawful Termination Based on Illness Without Medical Evidence and Failure to Offer Alternative Employment
The reasoning implicitly addresses whether the termination occurred at an inappropriate time (not untimely) as stipulated in this article.
V 2020 51 · zg (§ 29 PG)
Inspector Termination for Breach of Loyalty and Public Disclosure
Cited in the reasoning (Section 3) but not explicitly in the final orders (only procedural/cost rules are cited in the dispositive).
2020 GSI 926 · be (Art. 29 Abs. 1 PG)
Specialized Educator Termination Overturned Due to Lack of Weighty Reason and Failure to Implement Lesser Measures
The appeal was granted, leading to the legal consequence of continued employment based on this provision.
B.2018.112 · sg (Art. 29 Abs. 1 lit. c und d PG)
Leaflet Distribution Permit, Seizure, Detention, and Filming Restrictions Upheld in Part
The court determined that the police action of forcibly taking the appellant to the police station was not covered by this provision.
VD.2018.98 · bs (§ 29 Abs. 1 PG)
Teacher Termination Over Invalid Resignation Notice
Cited in conjunction with the Ordinance on Early Retirement to establish the written form requirement for employee termination.
100 2017 269 · be (Art. 29 Abs. 1 PG)
Municipality Dismissal Annulled Due to Procedural Violations and Unsubstantiated Grounds
The Tribunal cites this article as the legal basis for the principle of continued employment when the appeal against the termination is granted.
2016 1116 · be (Art. 29 Abs. 1 PG)
Termination of Employment Due to Disruptive Conflicts in Psychiatric Unit
This provision was cited in the appellant's primary request, but the appeal was ultimately dismissed, indicating this ground was not the basis for the final decision's affirmative ruling.
2016 1116 · be (Art. 29 Abs. 2 PG)
Termination of Employment Due to Disruptive Conflicts in Psychiatric Unit
This provision was cited in the appellant's alternative request, but the court ruled in E. 2.3 that it could not rule on this matter in the current proceedings, thus it was not applied in the final order.
2013 0905 · be (Art. 29 Abs. 1 PG)
Security Employee Termination Over Misconduct Overturned Due to Disproportionate Sanction
Cited as the basis for continuing the employment relationship because the termination decision was annulled.
PB.2002.00031 · zh (§ 29 lit. I c PG)
Suspension from Duty and Administrative Investigation Challenge
This provision appears to be the basis for the decision regarding the administrative review and the related suspension from duty, as the decision deals with the admissibility and proportionality of these measures.
PB.2002.00031 · zh (§ 29 lit. I c PG)
Public Employee's Administrative Leave and Compensation Dispute
Cited regarding the disciplinary law and the suspension from duty.