748.0
LFGLALNA
CH
CH
Art. 98 Bundesgesetz vom 21. Dezember 1948 über die Luftfahrt (LFG)
LFG; Zweiter Teil: Rechtsbeziehungen aus dem Betrieb der Luftfahrt; Fünfter Titel: Strafbestimmungen; Zweiter Abschnitt: Geltungsbereich und Strafverfolgung; II. Gerichtsbarkeit
Art. 98 LFG
Die an Bord eines Luftfahrzeuges begangenen strafbaren Handlungen unterstehen unter Vorbehalt von Absatz 2 der Bundesstrafgerichtsbarkeit.
Übertretungen im Sinne von Artikel 91 werden nach den Verfahrensvorschriften des Verwaltungsstrafrechtsgesetzes vom 22. März 1974 durch das BAZL verfolgt und beurteilt.
Sind die strafbaren Handlungen an Bord ausländischer Luftfahrzeuge über der Schweiz oder an Bord schweizerischer Luftfahrzeuge ausserhalb der Schweiz verübt worden, so kann die für die Strafverfolgung zuständige schweizerische Behörde von der Durchführung des Strafverfahrens absehen.
Gerichtsentscheide zu dieser Bestimmung (76)
AC.2019.0292 · vd (art. 98 let. a de la loi du 28 octobre 2008 sur la procédure administrative [LPA-VD; BLV 173.36])
Challenge to Building Permit for Public Space Development Over Compensatory Planting Deficiency
Procedural rule applied by the court when reviewing the municipality's assessment concerning aesthetics and integration.
SN.2019.21 (Art. 98 Abs. 1 LFG)
Partial Public Exclusion in Sexual Harassment Case Amidst Media Access
Cited to establish the court's jurisdiction over the offense committed on board a Swiss aircraft.
AC.2017.0129 · vd (art. 98 let. a de la loi du 28 octobre 2008 sur la procédure administrative [LPA-VD; RSV 173.36])
Municipality v. Building Permit Applicants (Aesthetic Integration)
Used to justify the Court's limited scope of review regarding the municipal authority's discretionary power on aesthetics.
AC.2017.0097 · vd (art. 98 let. a de la loi du 28 octobre 2008 sur la procédure administrative (LPA-VD; RSV 173.36))
Villa Extension Permit Challenge Upheld
Although mentioned in the reasoning concerning the scope of review on aesthetic grounds, it was not cited in the dispositive orders (I to V).
AC.2016.0052 · vd (Art. 98 de la loi du 28 octobre 2008 sur la procédure administrative [LPA-VD; RSV 173.36])
Neighbors v. Municipality Regarding Building Permit Aesthetics and Procedure
Cited in the reasoning section concerning the standard of review for aesthetic matters, but since the final orders only deal with rejection and costs, this is an exclusion based on the rule (it is not in the dispositive orders I. to V.).
BG.2015.41 (Art. 98 Abs. 2 LFG)
Jurisdiction Over Aviation Fraud Defaults to Cantonal Authorities
Cited by the applicant to argue that they are only responsible for prosecuting and judging violations under Art. 91 LFG, implying that other offenses fall under cantonal jurisdiction.
BG.2015.41 (Art. 98 LFG)
Jurisdiction Over Aviation Fraud Defaults to Cantonal Authorities
This article is analyzed to determine the jurisdiction for prosecuting offenses under the Aviation Act, particularly concerning the role of the BAZL and cantonal authorities.
AC.2014.0203 · vd (art. 98 de la loi du 28 octobre 2008 sur la procédure administrative [LPA-VD; RSV 173.36])
Appeal on Rural Building Transformation and Construction Permit
Cited within the reasoning that justifies the limited review of the municipal authority's aesthetic assessment, which led to the modification of the contested decision in order II.
GE.2015.0114 · vd (art. 98 let. A de la loi du 28 octobre 2008 sur la procédure administrative (LPA-VD))
Appeal Regarding Pedagogical Studies Failure Due to Missed Certifications and Force Majeure Claim
Cited in the reasoning when assessing whether the refusal to change the exam date constituted an abuse of discretion (Point 3).
AC.2014.0220 · vd (Art. 98 de la loi du 28 octobre 2008 sur la procédure administrative [LPA-VD; RSV 173.36])
Appeal Regarding Building Permit Near Train Station Dismissed Over Zoning Compliance
Cited in the legal reasoning regarding the scope of review of aesthetic/integration issues by the Cantonal Court, which is a procedural constraint on its review power.
PE.2015.0031 · vd (art. 98 al. 1 let. b de la loi du 28 octobre 2008 sur la procédure administrative (LPA-VD; RSV 173.36))
Appeal Regarding Refusal of Residence Permit for Marriage and Child Due to Procedural Flaws
Cited in the reasoning to support the admissible ground for appeal regarding the inaccurate finding of relevant facts.
BO.2014.0034 · vd (art. 98 let. a de la loi cantonale sur la procédure administrative du 28 octobre 2008 (LPA-VD; RSV 173.36))
Applicant v. Cantonal Study Grant Office (Discretionary Offset of Study Grant)
Cited as the legal basis for finding a violation of the law (negative excess of power) in the reasoning that justifies the annulment of the decision.
AC.2013.0301 · vd (art. 98 let. a de la loi cantonale sur la procédure administrative du 28 octobre 2008 (LPA-VD; RSV 173.36))
Biogas Facility Permit Appeal and Annulment Due to Unreviewed Project Modifications
The municipal decision was annulled for violating this article, which defines the conditions for quashing a decision (negative abuse of discretion).
GE.2012.0207 · vd (art. 98 de la loi du 28 octobre 2008 sur la procédure adminitrative (LPA-VD; RSV 173.36))
Residents v. Municipality on Traffic Sign Relocation
Cited in the reasoning to define the scope of the Court's legal review, but not explicitly cited in the dispositive.
AC.2012.0239 · vd (Art. 98 de la loi vaudoise du 28 octobre 2008 sur la procédure administrative [LPA-VD; RSV 173.36])
Appeal Dismissed: Marina Redevelopment and Expansion Permit Upheld
Cited in the reasoning to establish the scope of review (legality review), which governs the non-reviewability of opportunity arguments leading to the inadmissibility of certain pleas.